Advertisement

Drinking of Ethanol by Rhesus Monkeys: Experimental Strategies for Establishing Ethanol as a Reinforcer

  • Richard A. Meisch
  • Jack E. Henningfield
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 85B)

Abstract

Ethanol drinking by three male rhesus monkeys was established using a procedure termed food-induced drinking. The monkeys were maintained at approximately 80% of their free-feeding weights. During daily 3-hour sessions the monkeys had access to water and were provided with their daily food rations. Within approximately 20 minutes after obtaining their food ration, the monkeys drank up to 500 ml of water. In subsequent sessions, ethanol in increasing concentrations (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 5.6, 8% W/V) was substituted for water. When the monkeys were regularly drinking 100 to 200 ml of 8% ethanol, access to food was shifted from within the 3-hour sessions to a period beginning 1-hour after the sessions. Thereafter, daily sessions consisted of simply three hours of access to 8% ethanol; between sessions the monkeys had ad lib access to water plus their daily food ration. Under these conditions drinking of ethanol persisted at substantial rates, e.g., blood ethanol levels were usually 100 to 200 mg%. In the next series of manipulations, the monkeys were required to emit a fixed-number of responses per each delivery of approximately 0.5 ml of liquid, i.e., fixed-ratio schedules (FR) were instated. At FR 16 8% ethanol but not water (the control vehicle) maintained substantial performance. Fixed-ratio performance was similar to that observed using more commonly studied reinforcers in that when responding occurred, response rates were high and relatively constant. Ethanol-maintained behavior was similar to that reported in earlier studies from this laboratory: Long drinking bouts occurred at the beginning of sessions, and the initial drinking was later followed by several shorter drinking bouts. In contrast, water maintained markedly less responding, and the responding that did occur was spaced irregularly over the session. These findings confirm findings with other rhesus monkeys. That is, ethanol can function as an effective positive reinforcer via the oral route and can maintain intermittently reinforced behavior.

Keywords

Rhesus Monkey Food Pellet Fixed Ratio Ethanol Drinking Blood Ethanol Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, W. and Thompson, T. Ethanol self-administration in water-satiated rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 2:447–454, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bigelow, G. and Liebson, I. Cost factors controlling alcoholic drinking. Psychol. Rec., 22:305–314, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Deneau, G., Yanagita, T. and Seevers, M. H. Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. A measure of psychological dependence. Psychopharmacologia, 16: 30–48, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falk, J. L. Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science, 133:195–196, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falk, J. L. The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiol. Behav., 6:577–588, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henningfield, J. E. and Meisch, R. A. Ethanol as a positive rein-forcer via the oral route for rhesus monkeys: Maintenance of fixed-ratio responding. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 4:473–475, 1976a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henningfield, J. E. and Meisch, R. A. Ethanol as a positive rein-forcer for rhesus monkeys: Effects of fixed-ratio schedules and ethanol concentrations on drinking. Reported to the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1976b.Google Scholar
  8. Henningfield, J. E. and Meisch, R. A. Drinking device for rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 4:609–610, 1976c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holz, W. C. and Gill, C. A. Drug injections as negative reinforcers. Pharmacological Reviews, 27:437–446, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Meisch, R. A. The function of schedule-induced polydipsia in establishing ethanol as a positive reinforcer. Pharmacological Reviews, 27:465–473, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Meisch, R. A. Ethanol self-administration: Infrahuman studies. In T. Thompson and P. Dews (Eds.) Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology. New York: Academic Press, 1977, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Meisch, R. A. and Beardsley, P. Ethanol as a reinforcer for rats: Effects of concurrent access to water and alternate positions of water and ethanol. Psychopharmacologia, 43:19–23, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meisch, R. A., Henningfield, J. E. and Thompson, T. Establishment of ethanol as a reinforcer for rhesus monkeys via the oral route: Initial results. In M. M. Gross (Ed.) Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal: Experimental Studies, pp. 323–342. New York, Plenum Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Meisch, R. A. and Thompson, T. Rapid establishment of ethanol as a reinforcer for rats. Psychopharmacologia, 37:311–321, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mello, N. K. and Mendelson, J. H. Evaluation of a polydipsia technique to induce alcohol consumption in monkeys. Physiol. Behav., 7:827–836, 1971a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mello, N. K. and Mendelson, J. H. The effects of drinking to avoid shock on alcohol intake in primates. In M. K. Roach, W. M. McIsaac and P. J. Creaven (Eds.) Biological Aspects of Alcohol, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 313–332, 1971b.Google Scholar
  17. Mendelson, J. H. and Mello, N. K. Studies of the development of alcohol addiction in rhesus monkeys. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 215: 145–161, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, R. D., Stoltman, W. P. and Martin, G. E. Effects of ethanol dependence induced artificially in the rhesus monkey on the subsequent preference for ethyl alcohol. Physiol. Behav., 9: 43–48, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pieper, W. A. and Skeen, M. J. Induction of physical dependence on ethanol in rhesus monkeys using an oral acceptance technique. Life Sci., 11:989–997, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pieper, W. A. and Skeen, M. J. Development of functional tolerance to ethanol in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto). Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 1:289–294, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sinclair, J. D. The alcohol-deprivation effect in monkeys. Psychon. Sci., 25:21–22, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. Winger, G. D. and Woods, J. H. The reinforcing property of ethanol in the rhesus monkey: I. Initiation, maintenance and termination of intravenous ethanol-reinforced responding. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 215:162–175, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Woods, J. H., Ikomi, F. and Winger, G. D. The reinforcing property of ethanol. In M. K. Roach, W. M. McIsaac and P. J. Creaven (Eds.) Biological Aspects of Alcohol, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 371–388, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Yanagita, T. and Takahashi, S. Dependence liability of several sedative-hypnotic agents evaluated in monkeys. J. Pharmac. Exp. Ther., 185:307–316, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Meisch
    • 1
  • Jack E. Henningfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychiatry Research Unit Mayo Box 392University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations