Advertisement

The Effect of Low Dose Intravenous Alcohol on Human Information Processing

  • Kenneth C. Mills
  • John A. Ewing
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 85B)

Abstract

A model of multiple-stage information processing predicts alcohol to have a selective effect on mechanisms involving central processing rather than sensory input. However, behavioral effects at low alcohol doses administered orally can be overshadowed by fluctuations in gastrointestinal absorption and metabolism rate. Paid volunteers, who therefore received intravenous doses of alcohol and a barbiturate, were tested on tasks varying in sensory discriminability and in central processing difficulty. The low drug doses did not affect errors of stimulus encoding but increased error rate in memory comparison tasks. These results confirmed the predictions based on the mutiple-stage model.

Keywords

Psychological Refractory Period Human Information Processing Auditory Task Sodium Thiopental Sound Level Meter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blume, P. and Berchild, K. A gas chromatographic analysis of ethanol with identity confirmation. Analytical Biochemistry, 54:429–433, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dundee, J.W., Isaac, M. and Taggart, J. Blood ethanol levels following rapid intravenous infusion. Quart. J. Stud. Alc. 32: 741–747, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Huntley, M.S., Jr. Influences of alcohol and S-R uncertainty upon spatial localization time. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 27:131–140, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Moskowitz, H. and DePry, D. Differential effect of alcohol on auditory vigilance and divided-attention tasks. Quart. J. Stud. Alc. 29:54–63, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Moskowitz, H. and Burns, M. Effect of alcohol on the psychological refractory period. Quart. J. Stud. Alc. 32:782–790, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Moskowitz, H. and Roth, S. Effect of alcohol on response latency in object naming. Quart. J. Stud. Alc. 32:969–975, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Moskowitz, H. and Murray, J. T. Alcohol and backward masking of visual information. J. Stud. Alc. 37(1):40–45, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages, extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychol. 30: 276–315, 1969a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sternberg, S. Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist 57(4):421–457, 1969b.Google Scholar
  10. Tharp, V.K., Jr., Rundell, O.H. Jr., Lester, B.K. and Williams, H.L. Alcohol and information processing. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 40:33–52, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tharp, V. K. Jr., Rundell, O.H., Jr., Lester, B.K. and Williams, H.L. Alcohol and secobarbital: effects on information processing. In M. M. Gross (Ed.) Experimental Studies on Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal, New York, (In press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth C. Mills
    • 1
  • John A. Ewing
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Alcohol StudiesUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations