Abstract
Resonances, will play a central role in the discussions of this Conference. On the one hand we shall be concerned with the extraction of the parameters describing a resonance, its energy, its half width, etc., from experiment. On the other hand we shall want to be able to interpret these results in terms of the structure of the interacting nuclear systems--ultimately in terms of the wave function of the system or (a lesser but physically as significant a goal) for statistical parameters suitably related to that wave function. Ancient as these problems (the description of a resonance, the extraction of resonance parameters from experiment, their interpretation) are, their solution has remained the subject of a debate which has been argued by some with fanatical fervor. One of my objectives in today’s talk is to take the heat out of this quarrel. It is my thesis that each of the methods (although they may have had some deficiencies in their original formulation) have been or can be adapted by sufficiently clever men so as to become equivalently valid. I will not therefore, be an advocate for any particular formalism. I like my own [1,2,3,4] but all that means is that I am more comfortable in using its constructs and concepts, not that it is superior. The final expressions obtained for experimental observables are in fact very similar so that, as far as fitting the data is concerned, the experimentalist or theorist can choose whichever suits his fancy. In passing, it would however, be useful to have programs which would translate between possible forms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 5 357 (1958).
H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19 287 (1962).
H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 43 410 (1967).
H. Feshbach, Latin American Summer School (1968).
K. McVoy, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54 552 (1969).
D. B. Adler and F. T. Adler, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 5, 53 (1962).
D. Robson, Phys. Rev. 137B, 353 (1965).
A. K. Kerman and A. de Toledo-Piza, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 43,363 (1967); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 48 173, (1968).
F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 52 16 (1969).
K. McVoy, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54 17 (1969).
H. Feshbach, A. K. Kerman, R. H. Lemmer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 41 230 (1967).
A. de Toledo-Piza, M.I.T. Thesis.
Kerman, Kawai, McVoy, Private Communication.
R.H. Thomas, A.M. Lane, and E.P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 98 18 (1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 Plenum Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feshbach, H. (1972). Survey of Resonance Reaction Theories. In: Garg, J.B. (eds) Statistical Properties of Nuclei. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8666-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8666-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8668-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8666-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive