Skip to main content

A Comparison of Four Outcome Measures of Terminal Care

  • Chapter
A Safer Death

Abstract

In the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland there are now over 170 terminal care support services operating from hospices, hospitals or the community (St Christophers, 1987). The services, usually teams, follow the hospice philosophy in caring for terminally ill cancer patients and families. More teams are planned or are being developed, in some areas expanding the service to include terminally ill patients other than those diagnosed as suffering from cancer. There is a need to evaluate these teams and to seek ways to improve care, but who should make the assessments of their work and how should these assessments be made?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bloomsbury Support Team, 1987, Home and ward care, National Temperance Hospital, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. and McCarthy, M., 1984, Referral and Survival of patients accepted by a terminal care support team, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 38:310–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, C., 1978, “Psychosocial Care of the Dying Patient”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, B. J., 1986, The assessment of symptoms and mood in terminally ill cancer patients (Abstract): in “Psychosocial Issues in Malignant Disease”, M. Watson and S. Greer, eds., Pergamon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. and Higginson, I., Self audit in terminal care, in preparation. Mount, B. M. and Scott, J. F., 1983, Whither hospice evaluation? Journal of Chronic Disease; 36:731–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., 1980, Terminal care: evaluation of an advisory domiciliary service at St. Christopher’s Hospice, Postgraduate Medical Journal, 56:685–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., 1985, Terminal care: home, hospital or hospice? Lancet, i:155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. M., 1978, in “The Management of Terminal Disease”, C.M. Saunders ed., Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Christopher’s Hospice Information Service, 1987, Directory of Hospice Services, St. Christopher’s Hospice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Joseph’s Hospice Annual Report, 1986, St. Joseph’s Hospice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. W. M., 1985, Home care services for the terminally ill: a report for the Nuffield Foundation, Medical Care Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. W. M., 1987, Home care services — an alternative to hospices? Community Medicine, 9(1):47–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Higginson, I., Wade, A., McCarthy, M. (1988). A Comparison of Four Outcome Measures of Terminal Care. In: Gilmore, A., Gilmore, S. (eds) A Safer Death. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8359-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8359-2_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8361-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8359-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics