Abstract
Dorsocentral and scutellar bristles are rigidly canalized traits in wild-type Drosophila, showing a constant pattern of two anterior and two posterior bristles on the scutum and as many on the scutellum. The character results from a developmental process so well regulated that not only the number but also the position of all the bristles is constant. However, flies with one (or two) additional bristles on the scutum and/or the scutellum are often found at low frequencies in natural populations. Selective breeding of those deviant individuals quickly increases the mean number of extra bristles in the population. There have been reports of artificial directional selection resulting in an increase in the frequency of flies with two and four extra dorsocentral bristles (Ménsua, 1966; Pla, personal communication), suggesting the presence of a canalization threshold at those classes. Rendel and Sheldon (1960) have shown the possibility of artificial building up canalization for a phenotype other than the wild-type (two scutellar bristles) by using the variability of the scute mutant. The wild-type constancy of bristle number is presumably achieved through a polygenic system capable of stabilizing the phenotype despite the underlying genetic variation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bryant, P.J., 1978, Pattern formation in imaginai discs, in: “The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila,” vol. 2c, M. Ashburner and T.R.F. Wright, eds, Academic Press, London.
Gibson, J., 1970, Effects of temperature on selection for scutellar bristles, Heredity, 25:591.
Latter, D.H. and Scowcroft, W.R., 1970, Regulation of anterior and posterior scutellar bristle number in Drosphila, Genetics, 66:685.
Maynard Smith, J. and Sondhi, K.C., 1960, The genetics of a pattern, Genetics, 45:1039.
Ménsua, J.L., 1966, Análisis del genotipo de dos líneas seleccionadas por aumento de macroquetas dorsocentrales en D. melanogaster, Genet. Iber., 18:167.
Pennycuick, P.R. and Fraser, A.S., 1964, Variation of scutellar bristles in Drosophila. II. Effects of temperature, Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 17:764.
Poodry, C.A., 1975, A temporal pattern in the development of sensory bristles in Drosophila, Wilhelm Roux’s Arch., 178:203.
Rendel, J.M., 1965, Bristle pattern in soute stocks of D. melanogaster, Amer. Natur., 99, 904:25
Rendel, J.M. and Sheldon, B.L., 1960, Selection for canalization of the scute phenotype in D. melanogaster, Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 13:36.
Robertson, A., 1965, Variation in scutellar bristle number — an alternative hypothesis, Amer. Natur., 99:19.
Rubio, J., 1978, Seleccion estabilizadora de un fenotipo distinto del normal en macroquetas de Drosphila, Rev. Fac. Ciencias Univ. Oviedo, 17:101.
Scowcroft, W.R., 1973, Scutellar bristle components and canalization in D. melanogaster, Heredity, 30:289.
Scowcroft, W.R. and Latter, B.D., 1971, Decanalization of scutellar bristle number in Drosophila, Genet. Res. (Cambridge), 17:95.
Whittle, J.R.S., 1969, Genetic analysis of the control of number and pattern of scutellar bristles in D. melanogaster, Genetics, 63:167.
Young, S.S.Y. and Lewontin, R.C., 1966, Differences in bristle-making abilities in scute and wild-type D. melanogaster, Genet. Res. (Cambridge), 7:295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Vázquez, E., Rubio, J. (1982). Stabilizing Selection for Number and Pattern of Extra Bristles in Drosophila Melanogaster. In: Lakovaara, S. (eds) Advances in Genetics, Development, and Evolution of Drosophila. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8321-9_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8321-9_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8323-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8321-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive