Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Nato Conference Series ((MASC,volume 4))

Abstract

The recycling of materials used in outdated construction into new construction is probably as old as civilization itself. Although documentation is limited, certainly materials from various existing Roman, Egyptian, Greecian, etc. structures had been cannibalized for use in other construction. The advent of a highly mechanized society with low energy costs and the abundance of raw materials resulted in low cost construction materials. However, as labor costs escalated more rapidly in this environment than material or energy costs the rapid disposal, rather than recycling of construction materials was encouraged. To compound the overall situation, the invention of the rotary kiln led to the widespread production of virtually unlimited quantities of inexpensive portland cement. This along with the expanded use of steel reinforcement resulted in widespread use of concrete to make monolithic structures. The monolithic nature of concrete which makes it so unique and useful also has made its reclamation difficult and costly compared to the cost of using virgin materials in new concrete construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. D. Buck, “Recycled Concrete,” Highway Research Record No. 430, pp. 1–8, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Frondistou-Yannas, “Waste Concrete as Aggregate for New Concrete,” American Concrete Institute Journal, 74:8, pp. 373–376, August 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. D. Buck, “Recycled Concrete as a Source of Aggregate,” American Concrete Institute Journal, 74:5, pp. 212–219, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. J. Nixon, “Recycled Concrete as an Aggregate for Concrete-A Review,” Materials and Structures, 11:65, pp. 371–378, September 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.-R. Schulz, “Recycling on Concrete,” Betonwerk Fertigteil-Technik, 44:9, pp. 492–497, September 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bernard, “The Alternate Aggregate Source — Recycled Concrete,” Rural and Urban Roads, 16:10, pp. 52–53, October 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. K. Ray, “Concrete Recycling: An Historical Overview, Part I,” Rural and Urban Roads, 18:3, pp. 70–71, March 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. J. Halm, “Concrete Recycling,” Transportation Research Board News, 89, pp. 6–10, August 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Old Pavement Recycled into New Subbase,” Concrete Construction, 20:10, pp. 441–492, October 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. V. Bergren and R. A. Britson, “Portland Cement Concrete Utilizing Recycled Pavement,” Iowa Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Office of Materials, January 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Rebarred Slab Recycled as Pavement,” Highway and Heavy Construction, 122:1, pp. 62–63, January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Biggest PC Recycle Job Underway in Minnesota,” Rural and Urban Roads, 18:79, pg. 52, July 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Lane, “Connecticut — FHWA Demo Job Evaluates PCC Recycling,” Rural and Urban Roads, 18:11, pg. 31, November 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “State Pours Recycled Pavement,” Engineering News Record, 204:23, pg. 29, June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Robertson, “Recycled Concrete Forms Base Material for an Aggregate Short Region,” Rock Products, 83:2, pp. 50–51, February 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Crushing Converts Rubble Into Subbase Aggregate,” Roads and Streets, 114:5, pp. 44–45, May 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. R. Marek, B. M. Callaway, and R. E. Long, “Look at Processed Rubble — It’s a Valuable Source of Aggregates,” Roads and Streets, 114:9, pp. 82–85, September 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. B. Sadler, “A Crushing Success: Aggregate From Concrete,” Public Works, 104:4, pp. 72–73, April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. “Recycling Roads and Buildings with Portable Plants,” Pit and Quarry, 65:8, pp. 91–92, February 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. “Concrete Recycling Makes Everyone Happy,” Western Construction, 50:1, pg. 64, January 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Less Dumping, More Stone Supply with Contractor’s Slab Recycling,” Rural and Urban Roads, 17:34, pp. 46, 50, March 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “Old Concrete Recycled into Saleable Aggregate,” Highway and Heavy Construction, 122:7, pg. 87, July 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. “Urban Expressway Rebuilt on Recycled Concrete Base,” Engineering News Record, 203:22, pp. 24–25, November 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. “The Edens 3R Project: Showcase for Recycling,” Rural and Urban Roads, 18:3, pp. 34–35, March 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. H. Carpenter, M. I. Darter, and B. J. Dempsey, “A Moisture Accelerated Distress (MAD) Identification Manual,” Federal Highway Administration, Contract No. D0T-FH-11–9175, In Review.

    Google Scholar 

  26. “Recycled Slab is New Runway Base,” Highway and Heavy Construction, 120:7, pp. 30–33, July 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. M. Lea, “The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete,” 3rd Edition, Chemical Publishing Co., pg. 727, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  28. “Economics Spur Pavement Recycling,” Public Works, 106:6, pg. 93, June 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  29. “Rubble Recycling Saves Time, Energy, and the Environment,” Rock Products, 80:5, pp. 107–108, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. M. Knutson and M. R. Thompson, “Resilient Response of Railway Ballast,” Record 651, Transportation Research Board, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. M. Knutson and M. R. Thompson, “Permanent Deformation Behavior of Railway Ballast,” Record No. 694, Transportation Research Board, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  32. “Standard Specification D1863–80 for Mineral Aggregates Used on Built-Up Roofs,” American Society of Testing and Materials, Part 14, pp. 648–649, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. S. Boynton, “Chemistry and Technology of Limestone,” 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pg. 578, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. J. Hammer, Water Supply and Pollution Control, 3rd Edition, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, pg. 857, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. S. Ayres, “Calcium Silicate Slag as a Growth Stimulant for Sugar Cane On Low Silicon Soils,” Soil Science, 1010:3, pg. 216, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. H. F. Clements, “Roles of Calcium Silicate Slags in Sugar Cane Growth,” Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Paper No. 765, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. F. Clements, “Effects of Silicate on the Growth and Leaf Freckle of Sugar Cane in Hawaii,” Hawaii Agricultural Station, Technical Paper No. 722, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berger, R.L., Carpenter, S.H. (1981). Recycling of Concrete into New Applications. In: Kreijger, P.C. (eds) Adhesion Problems in the Recycling of Concrete. Nato Conference Series, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8312-7_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8312-7_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8314-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8312-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics