Skip to main content

Abstract

The Canadian government and several states in the United States are considering various legislative options regarding marijuana laws. In the face of public pressure for change and in view of the fact that criminal prohibition of marijuana has resulted in substantial enforcement and court costs, there has been a distinct trend in the United States toward the “decriminalization” of possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use. In October 1973, Oregon reduced the offense of possession of less than 1 oz of marijuana to a civil violation, with a maximum penalty of a $100 fine. Within 5 years, 11 other states had enacted similar legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Addiction Research Foundation, 1978, Canadians easing up on pot laws, The Journal 7(11):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackford, L., 1976, Summary Report-Surveys of Student Drug Use in San Mateo County, California, Department of Public Health and Welfare, San Mateo County, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, E. M., and the editors of Consumer Reports, 1975, Marijuana: The health questions/the legal question, Contemp. Drug Probl. 4:115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, K. B., 1977, A First Report of the Impact of California’s New Marijuana Law (SB95), State Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse, Sacramento, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for the Study of Non-Medical Drug Use, 1976, The Marijuana Laws, Center for the Study oi Non-Medical Drug Use, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M., 1977, Marijuana smoking in public increases as penalties drop: Social acceptance is also termed a factor in the open display of drug use, The New York Times, November 28, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuskey, W., Berger, L., and Richardson, A., 1978, The effects of marijuana decriminalization on drug use patterns: A literature review and research critique, Contemp. Drug Probl. 7:491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drug Abuse Council, 1974–1977, Marijuana survey—State of Oregon, News releases, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G., 1974, Cannabis and the criteria for legalization of a currently prohibited recreational drug: Groundwork for a debate, Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 251, 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P., 1980, Cannabis Criminals, Addiction Research Foundation Book Series, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, P., and Goodstadt, M., 1979, Legal stigma for marijuana possession, Criminology 17:208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, K., Kalant, O. J., Kalant, H., and Single, E., 1980, Cannabis: Adverse Effects on Health, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, M. D., Clark, R. M., and Robinson, T., 1979, The Decriminalization of Marijuana and the Maine Criminal Justice System: A Time/Cost Analysis, November, Maine Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, Augusta, Me.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G., 1977, Americans would vote to decriminalize marijuana, Press Release, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E., 1975, Sociological aspects of marijuana use, Contemp. Drug Probl. 4:397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinspoon, L., 1977, Marihuana Reconsidered, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., 1980, Marijuana use and the effects of marijuana decriminalization. Testimony presented at hearings on the effects of marijuana held by Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, January 16. Available from Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Dain Commission, 1972, Report, Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, 1979, An Evaluation of the Decriminalization of Marijuana in Maine, January, Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, Augusta, Me.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors’ Conference, 1977, Marijuana: A Study of State Policies and Penalties, 3 Vols., Center for Policy Research and Analysis, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootman, I., 1979, Recent trends in cannabis use in Canada, Drug Alcohol Depend. 4:425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saveland, W., and Bray, D., 1980, American Trends in Cannabis Use among States with Different and Changing Legal Regimes, Bureau of Tobacco Control and Biometrics, Health and Welfare, Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer Commission, 1972, Marijuana: Signal of Misunderstanding, First Report of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Single, E., Solomon, R., Erickson, P., and Fehr, K., 1980, Legislative Options Regarding Cannabis Possession in Canada, Paper presented at the Internal Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Drug Dependence, Cardiff, Wales, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzner, J. H., 1979, Drug Use in Ohio: 1978, Ohio Bureau of Drug Abuse, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada, 1979, Crime and Traffic Enforcement Statistics, Catalogue 85–205, Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. B., Guire, K., and Krell, M., 1976, Penalty for the possession of marijuana: An analysis of some of its concomitants, Contemp. Drug Probl. 5:553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C., and Rowe, A., 1973, Moral appeal, sanction, threat, and deviance: An empirical test, Soc. Probl. 20:488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Single, E.W. (1981). The Impact of Marijuana Decriminalization. In: Israel, Y., Glaser, F.B., Kalant, H., Popham, R.E., Schmidt, W., Smart, R.G. (eds) Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7740-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7740-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7742-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7740-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics