Abstract
The Canadian government and several states in the United States are considering various legislative options regarding marijuana laws. In the face of public pressure for change and in view of the fact that criminal prohibition of marijuana has resulted in substantial enforcement and court costs, there has been a distinct trend in the United States toward the “decriminalization” of possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use. In October 1973, Oregon reduced the offense of possession of less than 1 oz of marijuana to a civil violation, with a maximum penalty of a $100 fine. Within 5 years, 11 other states had enacted similar legislation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Addiction Research Foundation, 1978, Canadians easing up on pot laws, The Journal 7(11):1.
Blackford, L., 1976, Summary Report-Surveys of Student Drug Use in San Mateo County, California, Department of Public Health and Welfare, San Mateo County, Calif.
Brecher, E. M., and the editors of Consumer Reports, 1975, Marijuana: The health questions/the legal question, Contemp. Drug Probl. 4:115.
Budman, K. B., 1977, A First Report of the Impact of California’s New Marijuana Law (SB95), State Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse, Sacramento, Calif.
Center for the Study of Non-Medical Drug Use, 1976, The Marijuana Laws, Center for the Study oi Non-Medical Drug Use, Washington, D.C.
Chase, M., 1977, Marijuana smoking in public increases as penalties drop: Social acceptance is also termed a factor in the open display of drug use, The New York Times, November 28, p. 18.
Cuskey, W., Berger, L., and Richardson, A., 1978, The effects of marijuana decriminalization on drug use patterns: A literature review and research critique, Contemp. Drug Probl. 7:491.
Drug Abuse Council, 1974–1977, Marijuana survey—State of Oregon, News releases, Washington, D.C.
Edwards, G., 1974, Cannabis and the criteria for legalization of a currently prohibited recreational drug: Groundwork for a debate, Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 251, 62 pp.
Erickson, P., 1980, Cannabis Criminals, Addiction Research Foundation Book Series, Toronto.
Erickson, P., and Goodstadt, M., 1979, Legal stigma for marijuana possession, Criminology 17:208.
Fehr, K., Kalant, O. J., Kalant, H., and Single, E., 1980, Cannabis: Adverse Effects on Health, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto.
Fulton, M. D., Clark, R. M., and Robinson, T., 1979, The Decriminalization of Marijuana and the Maine Criminal Justice System: A Time/Cost Analysis, November, Maine Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, Augusta, Me.
Gallup, G., 1977, Americans would vote to decriminalize marijuana, Press Release, May 1977.
Goode, E., 1975, Sociological aspects of marijuana use, Contemp. Drug Probl. 4:397.
Grinspoon, L., 1977, Marihuana Reconsidered, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Johnston, L., 1980, Marijuana use and the effects of marijuana decriminalization. Testimony presented at hearings on the effects of marijuana held by Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, January 16. Available from Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Le Dain Commission, 1972, Report, Commission of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.
Maine Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, 1979, An Evaluation of the Decriminalization of Marijuana in Maine, January, Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, Augusta, Me.
National Governors’ Conference, 1977, Marijuana: A Study of State Policies and Penalties, 3 Vols., Center for Policy Research and Analysis, Washington, D.C.
Rootman, I., 1979, Recent trends in cannabis use in Canada, Drug Alcohol Depend. 4:425.
Saveland, W., and Bray, D., 1980, American Trends in Cannabis Use among States with Different and Changing Legal Regimes, Bureau of Tobacco Control and Biometrics, Health and Welfare, Canada, Ottawa.
Shafer Commission, 1972, Marijuana: Signal of Misunderstanding, First Report of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Single, E., Solomon, R., Erickson, P., and Fehr, K., 1980, Legislative Options Regarding Cannabis Possession in Canada, Paper presented at the Internal Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Drug Dependence, Cardiff, Wales, June.
Spitzner, J. H., 1979, Drug Use in Ohio: 1978, Ohio Bureau of Drug Abuse, Columbus, Ohio.
Statistics Canada, 1979, Crime and Traffic Enforcement Statistics, Catalogue 85–205, Queen’s Printer, Ottawa.
Stuart, R. B., Guire, K., and Krell, M., 1976, Penalty for the possession of marijuana: An analysis of some of its concomitants, Contemp. Drug Probl. 5:553.
Tittle, C., and Rowe, A., 1973, Moral appeal, sanction, threat, and deviance: An empirical test, Soc. Probl. 20:488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Single, E.W. (1981). The Impact of Marijuana Decriminalization. In: Israel, Y., Glaser, F.B., Kalant, H., Popham, R.E., Schmidt, W., Smart, R.G. (eds) Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7740-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7740-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7742-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7740-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive