Abstract
The detection of changes in sound intensity (ΔI) is one of the fundamental auditory capacities for which auditory systems have presumably been “designed” throughout evolution. Questions of the neural representations of sound intensity, and the ways these are processed by the brain are basic to an analysis of sensory coding. The psychophysical literature contains two major observations: (1) The ratio ΔI/I is approximately constant for noise signals within a wide range of I values (i.e., Weber’s law holds) (Miller 1947, Rodenburg 1972). (2) For tone signals, ΔI/I declines somewhat at larger I values (i.e., there is a “near miss” to Weber’s law) (Reisz 1928, McGill and Goldberg 1968, Jesteadt, Wier, and Green 1977, Steigel 1977).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dooling, R. J., Saunders, J. C.: Auditory intensity discrimination in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 1308–1310 (1975).
Ehret, G.: Comparative psychoacoustics: Perspectives of peripheral sound analysis in mammals. Naturwissenschaften 64, 461–470 (1977).
Fay, R. R.: Coding of information in single auditory-nerve fibers of the goldfish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 136–146 (1978).
Fay, R. R., Ahroon, W., Orawski, A.: Auditory masking patterns in the goldfish (Carassius auratus): Psychophysical tuning curves. J. Exp. Biol. 74, 83–100 (1978).
Hack, M. H.: Auditory intensity discrimination in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 74, 315–318 (1971).
Jacobs, D. W., Tavolga, W. N.: Acoustic intensity limens in the goldfish. Anim. Behav. 15, 324–335 (1967).
Jesteadt, W., Weir, C., Green, D.: Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 169–177 (1977).
McGill, W. J., Goldberg, J.: Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 576–581 (1968).
Miller, G. A.: Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking and loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 609–619 (1947).
Prosen, C. A., Moody, D. B., Stebbins, W. C., Hawkins, J. E., Jr.: Absolute and intensity difference thresholds in the guinea pig after cochlear injury by kanamycin and amikacin. Abstracts of the third midwinter research meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, 1980, p. 36.
Reisz, R. R.: Differential sensitivity of the ear for pure tone. Phys. Rev. 31, 867–875 (1928).
Rodenburg, M.: Sensitivity of the auditory system to differences in intensity. Ph.D. Thesis, Medical Faculty, Rotterdam, 1972.
Stebbins, W. C., Pearson, R. D., Moody, D. B.: Hearing in the monkey (Macaca): Absolute and differential sensitivity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, 1969.
Stiegel, M. S.: Intensity discrimination with three signal ensembles. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburg, 1977.
Terman, M.: Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 13, 145–160 (1970).
Viemeister, N. F.: Intensity of discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: The effects of filtered noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1265–1269 (1972).
Zwicker, E.: Scaling. In: Handbook of Perception, Vol. 5/2. Keidel, W., Neff, W. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1975, p. 441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hall, L., Patricoski, M., Fay, R.R. (1981). Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Intensity Discrimination in the Goldfish. In: Tavolga, W.N., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (eds) Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes. Proceedings in Life Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7186-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7186-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7188-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7186-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive