Skip to main content

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to explicate a perspective termed radical-critical theory that questions the most fundamental assumptions of traditional family sociology. Basically, radical critics claim that family sociology, one of the oldest areas in the discipline, reflects its subject matter (rather than explaining it) and, as a consequence, constructs a deeply conservative sociological approach that limits its contribution to sociology and serves to justify the status quo in society.1

Sociology (and here we refer specifically to family sociology) “is a science whose progress is marked less by a perfection of consensus than by a refinement of debate. What gets better is the precision with which we vex each other.”

Geertz (1973, p. 29)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Althusser, L. For Marx. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.,& Balibar, E. Reading Capital. London: New Left Books, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, P. Centuries of childhood (R. Baldick trans.). New York: Vintage, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D.,& O’Malley, P. M. Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses from the nation’s high school seniors. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R. A. The dialectical method: Its application to social theory. Social Forces ,1979, 57 (March), 785–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Benfield, G. J. The spermatic economy: A nineteenth-century view of sexuality. In M. G. Gordon (Ed.), The American Family in Social-Historical Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K. Female sexual slavery. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. H. Empirical methods and radical sociology: A liberal critique. In J. D. Colfax& J. L. Roach (Eds.), Radical sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. S., Gagnon, J. H.,& Simon, W. Pornography: High school and college years. Technical Reports of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, D. Beyond the sociology of conflict. London: Macmillan, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, N. Toward a critical sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T. Competing paradigms in macrosociology. Annual Review of Sociology ,1975, 1 ,191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. A history and analysis of radical activism in sociology. Sociological Inquiry ,1970, 40 (Winter), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon& Schuster, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family, 1926, 7(March), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. The family from institution to companionship. New York: American Book, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E.& Cottrell, L. Predicting success or failure in marriage. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1939. J Burgess, E.,& Wallin, P. Engagement and marriage. Philadelphia: Lip-pincott, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G.,& Morgan, G. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burroway, M. Contemporary currents in marxist theory. The American Sociologist ,1978, 13 ,50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, K. L.,& Long, R. Premarital sex behavior in the sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1971, 33 ,36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, C. Influence of the world’s religions on the status of women. In E. C. Snyder (Ed.), The study of women. New York: Harper& Row, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. Alice’s adventures in wonderland and through the looking-glass. New York: Illustrated Editions, J. J. Little& Ives, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. H. Delineating a Marxist interest in ethnomethodology. The American Sociologist ,1977, 12 (Feb.), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R. R.,& Bokemeier, J. L. Premarital sex in the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1980, 42 ,759–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colfax, J. D.,& Roach, J. L. Radical sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinicos, A. Althusser’s Marxism. London: Pluto Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connerton, P. Critical sociology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. Continuities in the study of social conflict. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. E.,& Petras, J. W. The sociology of knowledge: A reader. New York: Praeger, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. Gyn-ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1976. Davis, N. Z. Ghosts, kin and progeny: Some features of family life in early modern France. Daedalus ,1977, 106 (Spring), 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I. Pornography and repression: A reconsideration. Signs,1980, 5 (Summer), 686–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollars and Sense. Pornography: Obscure profits at the expense of women. Boston; September 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzelot, J. The policing of families. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckberg, D. L.,& Hill, L. The paradigm concept and sociology: A critical review. American Sociological Review ,1979, 44 ,925–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B.,& English, D. For her own good: 150 Years of the experts’ advice to women. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, M. Monolithic model of the family. The Canadian Journal of Sociology ,1981, 6 ,367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, J. P. On the importance of the sociology of science to the goals of general education. The American Sociologist ,1980, 15 (Nov.), 214-Fasola-Bologna, A. The sociological profession and revolution. Sociological Inquiry ,1970, 40 ,35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R.,& Turkel, G. Radical sociology: The emergence of neo-Marxian perspectives in U.S. sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1978, 4 ,193–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality& Social Psychology ,1973, 26 (3), 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, U. Toward a critical analysis of role. Social Problems ,1980, 27 ,556–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksmann, M. Structuralist analysis in contemporary social thought. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. System, structure and contradiction in Das Capital. In Michael Lane (Ed.),Introduction to structuralism. New York: Basic Books, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. Woman’s body, woman’s right: A social history of birth control in America. New York: Penguin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. For sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. The two Marxisms: Contradictions and anomalies in the development of theory. New York: Seabury Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., Harvey, E., Warner, L.,& Smith, L. The problem of reifica-tion. In S. G. McNall& G. Howe (eds.), Current perspectives in social theory. Greenwich, Conn.: J AI Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, W. V. Marxist structuralism. In P. Blau& R. Merton (Eds.), Continuities in structural inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q.& Nowell-Smith, G. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence& Wishart, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. Critical theory: Selected essays ,trans. by Matthew J. O’Connell et al. New York: Herder& Herder, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosken, F. P. The Hosken Report: Genital and sexual multilation of females. Lexington, Mass.: Women’s International Network News, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeway, E. Who is Sylvia? On the loss of sexual paradigms. Signs ,1980, 5 ,573–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. The dialectical imagination. London: Heineman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. G. On the prevalence of rape in the United States. Signs, 1980,6, 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D., Schvaneveldt, J.,& Miller, B. The attitudes and activities of contemporary family theorists. Journal of Comparative Family Studies ,1977, 8 (Spring), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. , & Smythies, J. R. Beyond reductionism. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. Haven in a heartless world: The family besieged. New York: Basic Books, 1977. Laws, J. L. The second X: Sex role and social role. New York: Elsevier, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, T.,& Young, T. R. From conflict theory to conflict methodology: An emerging paradigm for sociology. In A. Wells (Ed.), Contemporary sociological theories. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, A. The origins of English individualism: Some surprises. Theory and Society ,1978, 6 (Sept.), 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. Sexual harrassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. K. Existential sociology. In A. Wells (Ed.), Contemporary sociological theories. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing Company, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social theory. New York: Oxford, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, D. The nature and types of sociological theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. Early writings ,trans. by R. Livingston& G. Benton. Har-mondsworth, England: Penguin, 1844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, B. H. Structuralism versus individualism, Part 1: Shadowbox-ing in the dark. Social Forces ,1980, 59 ,335–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, B. H. Structuralism versus individualism, Part II: Ideological and other obfuscations. Social Forces ,1981, 59 ,627–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W.,& Wilson, T. R. On the reification of social structure. In S. G. McNall& G. Howe (Eds.), Current perspectives in social theory. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, S. G. Theoretical perspectives in sociology. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, S. G.,& Johnson, J. C. M. The new conservatives: Eth-nomethodologists, phenomenologists, and symbolic interactionalists. Insurgent Sociologist ,1975, 5, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarie, D. Marx: Sociology/social change/capitalism. London: Quartet Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miley, J. D. False reciprocity and the theory of exchange. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Southern Sociological Society, Louisville, Kentucky, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. Y.,& Fowlkes, M. R. Social and behavioral constructions of female sexuality. Signs ,1980, 5 ,783–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K. Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. H. J. Social theories and the family. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In R. Morgan (ed.), Going too far: The personal chronicle of a feminist. New York: Vintage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper& Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. Industry and inequality. New York: St. Martin’s press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. Making sense together: An introduction to wild sociology. New York: Harper& Row, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, B.,& Bubolz, M. Toward a critical theory of the family. Paper given at Research and Theory Workshop, National Council of Family Relations Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, E. S. Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives. Signs ,1980, 5 ,605–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. P. Reproductive freedom: Beyond “a woman’s right to choose.” Signs ,1980, 5, 661–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plekhanov, G. Selected philosophical works (Vol. 1). Moscow: Progress, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. Critical theory of the family. New York: Seabury Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R., Ross, E.,& Bridenthal, R. Examining family history. Feminist Studies ,1979, 5 ,174–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Red Collective. The politics of sexuality in capitalism. London: Publications Distribution Cooperative, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. Some observations on ideology and sexuality in America. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1981, 43 (May), 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs ,1980, 5 ,631–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. Paradigm analysis in sociology: Clarifying the issues. American Sociological Review ,1981, 46, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z. The use and abuse of anthropology: Reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding. Signs ,1980, 5, 389–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R. R. Religion and sexism: Images of women in the Jewish and Christian traditions. New York: Simon& Schuster, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroyer, T. A reconceptualization of critical theory. In J. D. Colfax& J. L. Roach (Eds.), Radical sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroyer, T. The critique of domination: The origins and development of critical theory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, A. K. Sex and power: Sexual bases of radical feminism. Signs ,1980, 5 ,590–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, J.,& Schwendinger, H. Sociology’s founding fathers: Sexist to a man. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1971,33 ,783–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalin, D. N. The development of Soviet sociology, 1956-1976. Annual Review of Sociology ,1978, 4, 171–191. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalin, D.N. The genesis of social interactionism and differentiation of macro-and microsociological paradigms. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations ,1978, 6 ,3–38. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, E. The making of the modern family. New York: Basic Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. The theory of organizations. London: Heinemann, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythies, J. R.,& Koestler, A. Beyond reductionism: The Alpbach symposium 1968. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociological Inquiry. Radical perspectives in sociology. Special Issue ,1970, 40 (Winter), 3–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. On the institutionalization of sexuality. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1969, 31 (August), 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M.,& Vidich, A. Sociology on trial. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. The family, sex and marriage in England 1500-1800. New York: Harper& Row, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, A. Toward a radical sociology. Sociological Inquiry ,1970, 40 ,3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tar, Z. The Frankfurt school: The critical theories of Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. L., Kleber, J. E.,& Galligan, R. Through the glass darkly: Family theory, the new philosophy of science, and hermeneutics. Paper presented at Research and Theory Workshop, National Council of Family Relations Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. Sex and society. Boston: Richard G. Badger-The Gorham Press, 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timasheff, N. S. Sociological theory. New York: Random House, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg, A. “Critical theory: Is there still hope?” American Journal of Sociology ,1980, 86 (November), 449–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, D. S. Dialectical social science. In S. G. McNall (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives in sociology. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardell, M. L.,& Benson, K. “A dialectical view: Foundation for an alternative sociological method.” In S. G. McNall (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives in sociology. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. Contemporary sociological theories. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineberg, A. E. The development of sociology in the Soviet Union. London: Routledge& Kegan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. On thinking about the future. The American Sociologist ,1974, 9 ,26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. R. The politics of sociology: Gouldner, Goffman, and Garfinkel. In S. Denisoff, O. Callahan,& M. Levine (Eds.), Theories and paradigms in contemporary sociology. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky, E. Capitalism, the family, and personal life. New York: Harper& Row, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetterberg, H. L. On theory and verification in sociology. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osmond, M.W. (1987). Radical-Critical Theories. In: Sussman, M.B., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7151-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7151-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7151-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics