Advertisement

The Establishment of Novel Mate-Recognition Systems in Introgressive Hybrid Drosophila Populations

  • Bruce Wallace
  • Milton W. Timm
  • Marina P. P. Strambi

Abstract

Closely related species—for example, members of the same genus often coexist within small geographic areas. Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis can serve as a familiar example. Although their geographic distributions differ (Dobzhansky and Epling, 1944), as do their local spatial, feeding, and temporal preferences (Dobzhansky, 1951; Dobzhansky et al., 1956), members of these two species do nevertheless encounter one another where they occur sympatrically. They can, for example, be taken in the same trap. There, mating flies can be frequently observed, but when females are distributed individually among culture bottles, hybrid progeny are rarely encountered. Dobzhansky et al. (1968) report that among several thousand progenies examined over several decades, only two were of hybrid origin. [Reasons for believing that gene exchange between these species may be even rarer than these two cases would suggest are given by Dobzhansky (1951, 1973).] A preference for mating with a member of one’s own species (ethological isolation) is a necessary feature common to all congeneric species pairs living in sympatry.

Keywords

Parental Species Mating Behavior Mating Preference Hybrid Population Mate Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahearn, J. N., Carson, H. L., Dobzhansky, T., and Kaneshiro, K. Y., 1974, Ethological isolation among three species of the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:901–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beadle, G. W., and Coonradt, V. L., 1944, Heterokaryosis in Neurospira crassa, Genetics 29:291–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burla, H., Brito da Cunha, A., Cordeiro, A. R., Dobzhansky, T., Malogolowkin, C., and Pavan, C., 1949, The willistoni group of sibling species of Drosophila, Evolution 3:300–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmody, G., Collazo, A. D., Dobzhansky, T., Ehrman, L., Jaffrey, I. S., Kimball, S., Obrebski, S., Silagi, S., Tidwell, T., and Uliich, R., 1962, Mating preferences and sexual isolation within and between the incipient species of Drosophila paulistorum, Am. Midl. Nat. 68:67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobzhansky, T., 1936, Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids, Genetics 21:113–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobzhansky, T., 1947, Genetics of natural populations. XIV. A response of certain gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura to natural selection, Genetics 32:142–160.Google Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky, T., 1948, Genetics of natural populations. XVIII. Experiments on chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura from different geographic regions. Genetics 33:588–602.Google Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky, T., 1950, Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, Genetics 35:288–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky, T., 1951, Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. X. Reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis under natural and under laboratory conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37:792–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobzhansky, T., 1954. Evolution as a creative process. in: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Genetics, Caiyologia (Suppl.) 6:435–449.Google Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky, T., 1973. Is there gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis in their natural habitats. Am. Nat. 107:312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky, T., and Epling, C., 1944. Contributions to the Genetics, Taxonomy, and Ecology of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Its Relatives. Publication 554, Carnegie Institution of Washington. Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  13. Dobzhansky, T., and Levene, H., 1951. Development of heterosis through natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 85:247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobzhansky, T., and Pavlovsky, O., 1953. Indeterminate outcome of certain experiments on Drosophila populations. Evolution 7:198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobzhansky, T., Cooper, D. M., Phaff, H. J., Knapp, E. P., and Carson, H. L., 1956. Studies on the ecology of Drosophila in the Yosemite region of California. IV. Differential attraction of species of Drosophila to different species of yeasts, Ecology 37:544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobzhansky, T., Ehrman, L., and Kastristis, P. A., 1968. Ethological isolation between sympatric and allopatric species of the obscura group of Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 16:79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrman, L., 1964a, Courtship and mating behavior as a reproductive isolating mechanism in Drosophila, Am. Zool. 4:147–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrman, L., 1964b, Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv’s experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Rudiments of sexual isolation, Genet. Res. Camb. 5:150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehrman, L., 1965, Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and between sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorum races, Evolution 19:459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrman, L., 1972, A factor influencing the rare male mating advantage in Drosophila, Behav. Genet. 2:69–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrman, L., and Parsons, P. A., 1981. Behavior Genetics and Evolution, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Ehrman, L., and Probber, J., 1978, Rare Drosophila males: The mysterious matter of choice. Am. Sci. 66:216–222.Google Scholar
  23. Ewing, A. W., 1969, The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, Anim. Behav. 17:555–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K., 1980. Genetic variations of courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulons, Anim. Behav. 7:60–65.Google Scholar
  25. Kawanishi, M., and Watanabe, T. K., 1981, Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, and their hybrids, Evolution 35:1128–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kessler, S., 1966, Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis, Evolution 20:634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, J. C., 1947, Interspecific relationships within the guarani group of Drosophila, Evolution 1:143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koopman, K. F., 1950, Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis, Evolution 4:135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leonard, J. E., Ehrman, L., and Schorsch, M., 1974, Bioassay of a Drosophila pheromone influencing sexual selection, Nature 250:261–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levin, D. A., 1978, The origin of isolating mechanisms in flowering plants, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 11 (M. K. Hecht, W. C. Steere, and B. Wallace, eds.), pp. 185–317, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Mayr, E., and Dobzhansky, T., 1945, Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. IV. Modification of the degree of isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis and of sexual preferences in Drosophila prosaltans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 31:75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson, J. T., and Dobzhansky, T., 1945, Incipient reproductive isolation between two subspecies of Drosophila pallidipennis, Genetics 30:429–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Powell, J. R., 1978, The founder-flush speciation theory: An experimental approach, Evolution 32:465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spieth, H. T., 1952, Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera), Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99:399–474.Google Scholar
  35. Spieth, H. T., 1968, Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 2 (T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere, eds.), pp. 157–193, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Spieth, H. T., 1982, Behavioral biology and evolution of the Hawaiian picture-winged species group of Drosophila, in: Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 14 (M. Hecht, B. Wallace, and G. Prance, eds.), pp. 351–437, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Stalker, H. D., 1942, Sexual isolation studies in the species complex Drosophila virilis, Genetics 27:238–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Strambi, M. P. P., 1981, The Mating Behavior of Flies from Three Hybrid Populations of Drosophila persimilis and Drosophila pseudoobscura, M. S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Tan, C. C., 1946, Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, Genetics 31:558–573.Google Scholar
  40. Timm, M. W., 1979, The Mating Behavior of Flies from Introgressive Hybrid Populations of Drosophila, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Van Valen, L., 1963, Introgression in laboratory populations of Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura, Heredity 18:205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waldren, I., 1964, Courtship sound production in two sympatric sibling Drosophila species, Science 144:191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallace, B., 1954, Genetic divergence of isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Genetics, Caryologia (Suppl.) 6:761–764.Google Scholar
  44. Wasserman, M., and Koepfer, H. R., 1977, Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis, Evolution 31:812–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright, S., and Dobzhansky, T., 1946, Genetics of natural populations. XII. Experimental reproduction of some of the changes caused by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, Genetics 31:125–156.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Wallace
    • 1
  • Milton W. Timm
    • 1
  • Marina P. P. Strambi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations