Advertisement

Reality, Psychoanalysis, and Hermeneutical Science

Reply to Commentators
  • Anders Lindseth
Chapter
  • 87 Downloads
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 4)

Abstract

It is a difficult and demanding but also an interesting task to answer the commentaries upon my essay, because they treat very different and important aspects of the problem of a hermeneutical foundation of psychoanalysis as a science. Almost all the commentators have concerned themselves with two themes, and it therefore seems to me particularly important to explicate them in greater detail. The first point is of a general, the second of a somewhat more specific nature, the former being the concept and the possibility of a hermeneutical science as such, and the latter the concept of a therapeutical inner dialogue. These are more closely related to each other than one might first expect and are of central importance for philosophy as well as for psychology.

Keywords

Psychoanalytical Theory Mental Nature True Reality Hermeneutic Philosophy Unambiguous Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gadamer, H.-G. (1983). Heideggers Wege. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
  2. Grünbaum, A. (1983). Freud’s theory: The perspective of a philosopher of science. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 57, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamann, J. G. (1967). Schriften zur Sprache. (J. Simon, Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1772–1788)Google Scholar
  4. Hanly, C. (1983) . A problem of theory testing. The International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 10, 393–405.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. In G. W. F. Hegel, Werke in zwanzig Bänden (Vol. 7). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1821)Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M. (1972). Sein und Zeit (12th ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
  7. Herder, J. G. (1966). Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. (H. D. Irmscher, Ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam. (Original work published 1772)Google Scholar
  8. Holen, A. (Ed.). (1981). Stillhetens psykologi—En bok om Acemeditasjon (4th rev. ed.). Oslo: Dyade Forlag.Google Scholar
  9. Humboldt, W. v. (1904–1918). Gesammelte Schriften (16 vols.). Berlin: AkademieAusgabe.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, E. (1965) . Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. (Original work published 1911)Google Scholar
  11. Killingmo, B. (1971). Den psykoanalytiske behandlingsmetode—Prinsipper og begreper. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  12. Killingmo, B. (1980). Rorschachmetode og psykoterapi—En egopsykologisk studie. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lindseth, A. (1983). Hva kan vi vite? Rudolf Steiners erkjennelsesteori i lys av vår tid. Dyade, 15 (6), 2–46.Google Scholar
  15. Løgstrup, K. E. (1976). Vidde og praegnans—Sprogfilosofiske betragtninger. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  16. Otto, S. (1983). Rhetorische Techne oder Philosphie sprachlicher Darstellungskraft? Zur Rekonstruktion des Sprachhumanismus der Renaissance. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 37, 497–514.Google Scholar
  17. Otto, S. (Ed.). (1984). Renaissance und frühe Neuzeit. In R Bubner (Ed.), Geschichte der Philosophie in Text und Darstellung (Vol. 3). Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  18. Quine, W. V. O. (1967). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1960)Google Scholar
  19. Royce, J. R. (1983). Psychological epistemology. Methodology and Science, 16, 164–180.Google Scholar
  20. Schjeldrup, H. (1955). Lasting effects of psychoanalytic treatment. Psychiatry, 18, 109–133.Google Scholar
  21. Stegmüller, W. (1983). Erklärung—Begründung—Kausalität (2nd expanded ed.). In W. Stegmüller, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1977). Der Garten des Menschlichen—Beiträge zur geschichtlichen Anthropologie. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Lindseth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations