Advertisement

The Construal of Psychoanalysis as a “Practical Hermeneutical Science”

An Avoidance of Critical Issues
  • Morris N. Eagle
Chapter
  • 85 Downloads
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 4)

Abstract

Every once in a while one reads a paper or a book with which one disagrees so profoundly and at so many different points that one hardly knows where to begin in laying out the nature of the disagreement and the points of dispute. I feel somewhat overwhelmed by the depth of my general disagreement with Lindseth’s point of view and by the sheer multiplicity of specific points of dispute. Let me, however, try to give the reader at least some idea of what I think is basically mistaken and misguided about Lindseth’s “metascientific” conception of psychoanalysis, by enumerating specific points of criticism.

Keywords

Natural Science Psychoanalytic Theory True Believer Personal Conviction Personal Testimony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowlby, J. (1981). Psychoanalysis as a natural science. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 8, 243–256.Google Scholar
  2. Eagle, M. (1980). Psychoanalytic interpretations: Veridicality and therapeutic effectiveness. Noûs, 14, 405–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eagle, M. (1983). The epistemological status of recent developments in psychoanalysis. In R. S. Cohen & L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honour of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 31–55). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, P., & Greenberg, R. P. (1978). The scientific evaluation of Freud’s theories and therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Flax, J. (1981). Psychoanalysis and the philosophy of science: Critique or resistance? Journal of Philosophy, 78, 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grünbaum, A. (1980). Epistemological liabilities of the clinical appraisal of psychoanalytic theory. Noûs, 14, 307–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grünbaum, A. (1982). Can psychoanalytic theory be cogently tested “on the couch”? Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 5, 155–255, 411–436.Google Scholar
  8. Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heelan, P. A. (1983). Space-perception and philosophy of science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Horowitz, L., Sampson, H., Seiligman, E. Y., Wolfson, A., & Weiss, J. (1975) . On the identification of warded-off contents: An empirical and methodological contribution. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 545–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luborsky, L. (1967). Momentary forgetting during psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: A theory and research method. In R. R. Holt (Ed.), Motives and thought: Essays in honour of David Rapaport (pp. 175–217) . New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  12. Marmor, J. (1962). Psychoanalytic therapy as an educational process. In J. Masserman (Ed.), Science and psychoanalysis: Vol. 5. Psychoanalytic education. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  13. Peterfreund, E. (1983) . The process of psychoanalytic therapy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sampson, H., Weiss, J., & Gassner, S. (1977). Research on the psychoanalytic process: II A comparison of two theories of how previously warded-off contents emerge in psychoanalysis (Bulletin No. 3). San Francisco: Psychotherapy Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Zion Hospital and Medical Center.Google Scholar
  15. Schafer, R. (1976). A new language for psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Steele, R. (1979). Psychoanalysis and hermeneutics. International Review of PsychoAnalysis, 6, 389–411.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, C. (1973). Peaceful coexistence in psychology. Social Research, 40, 55–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris N. Eagle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYork UniversityDownsviewCanada

Personalised recommendations