Skip to main content

The Dichotomous Approach to Soft Consensus Measurement

  • Chapter
Consensus Under Fuzziness

Part of the book series: International Series in Intelligent Technologies ((ISIT,volume 10))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

Generally in soft consensus models a preference relation defined on a set of options is associated with each individual concerned. In this paper it is supposed that each individual may assume a position of adversion or propension with respect to every option. With respect to some option the individuals may also assume no position. We define this model of fuzzy consensus dichotomous while we call the usual model relational. The fuzzy-logic-based calculus used in the relational model can be also applied to the dichotomous model. Furthermore, we propose a soft consensus measure based on the Choquet integral considered as a fuzzy integral to capture some specific situations. The dichotomous model of soft consensus performs very well with some real life problems, e. g. to describe the possible coalitions between parties in a parliament or stockholders in a company. In order to point out its features, the dichotomous model is applied to a description of some apects of the the Italian political debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Choquet G. Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier 1953; 5: 131–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M. Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1995; 69: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M, Murofushi T, Sugeno M. Fuzzy measure of fuzzy events defined by fuzzy integrals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1992; 50: 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M. A “soft” measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research 1988; 34: 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M. A “human-consistent” degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Mathematical Social Sciences 1989; 18: 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H. Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1992; 49: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi, H. Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using OWA (ordered weighted average) operators. Control and Cybernetics 1993; 22: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger K. Probabilistic theory of relations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Math.) 1951; 37: 178–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M. Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Doct. Thesis, Tokio Institute of Technology, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber S. A general concept of fuzzy connectives, negations and implications based on t-norms and t-conorms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1983; 11: 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greco, S. (1997). The Dichotomous Approach to Soft Consensus Measurement. In: Kacprzyk, J., Nurmi, H., Fedrizzi, M. (eds) Consensus Under Fuzziness. International Series in Intelligent Technologies, vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6333-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7908-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6333-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics