Advertisement

Subscriber Loops

  • Syed V. Ahamed
  • Victor B. Lawrence

Abstract

Over the evolutionary phase of most voice networks, a large amount of copper in the form of wires has been used to carry electrically encoded information bearing signals. Copper is a very good conductor (resistivity 1.712×10-8 Ohms/m, 25° C) of electrical signals, being next to silver (resistivity 1.617×10-8 Ohms/m, 25° C). It is cheap, readily available, durable and ductile. For these reasons, it has been used for overhead wires, twisted wire-pairs, coaxial cables, CATV distribution, and for TV broadcast cable (twin-cable). In the context of communication networks, the copper medium has played a significant role and still retains a sizable (but diminishing) foothold in most established networks. Two well-established networks that depend heavily upon copper for distribution of information are the traditional telephone networks and the CATV networks. More recently, the impact of fiber has been dominant and resounding. Fiber as a viable alternate both for long-haul and for local distribution of information is firmly established. The impending hybrid-fiber/coax technology and cellular wireless “last mile” both pose a serious threat to the continued role of copper as an electrical signal carrier beyond the year 2020.

Keywords

Image Impedance Loop Length Digital Subscriber Line American National Standard Institute European Telecommunication Standard Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 5.1
    Bell Laboratories 1991, “Siliton Transmission via Optical Gates,” Bell Labs News, September 3, pages 1 and 5)Google Scholar
  2. 5.2
    J.D. Dega, G.W.R. Luderer and A.K. Vaidya 1989, “Fast Packet Technology for Future Switches,” AT&T Technical Journal, March/April 36–50Google Scholar
  3. 5.3
    T. Starr, D. Waring and J.J. Werner 1991, “HDSL An Expedient Broadband Access,” Private Communication Google Scholar
  4. 5.4
    Ahamed S.V. 1982, “Simulation and Design Studies of the Digital Subscriber Lines,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 61, 1003–1077Google Scholar
  5. 5.5
    P.A. Gresh 1969, “Physical and Transmission Characteristics of Customer Loop Plant,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 48, 3337–3385Google Scholar
  6. 5.6
    Manhire L.M. 1978, “Physical and Transmission Characteristics of the Customer Loop Plant,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 57Google Scholar
  7. 5.7
    S.V. Ahamed and R.P.S. Singh, 1986, “Physical and Transmission Characteristics of Subscriber Loops for ISDN Services,” Proceedings of IEEE ICC-86, 1211–1215Google Scholar
  8. 5.8
    S.V. Ahamed and R.A. McDonald 1985, “Calculation of Insertion Losses in Loops in the 1983 Loop Survey Data Base at Frequencies Relevant for ISDN Basic Access,” T1D1.3 Contribution, Vancouver, Canada, August 19–23Google Scholar
  9. 5.9
    J.W. Lechlieder and R.A. McDonald 1986, “Capability of Telephone Loop Plant for ISDN Basic Access,” Proceedings of lSSLS 86, September 29-October 3, 156–161Google Scholar
  10. 5.10
    R.K. Even, R.A. McDonald and H. Seidel 1979, “Digital Transmission Capability of the Loop Plant,” Conference Record ICC’ 79, Paper 2.1Google Scholar
  11. 5.11
    S.V. Ahamed, B.S. Bosik, N.G. Long and R.W. Wyndrum, Jr., 1979, “The Provision of High-speed Digital Data Services over Existing Loop Plant,” Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference, Vol. 33, 265–270Google Scholar
  12. 5.12
    M.J. Miller and S.V. Ahamed 1988, Digital Transmission Systems and Networks, Volume II Applications, Computer Science Press, Chapter 6, 275–336Google Scholar
  13. 5.13
    B.S. Bosik and S.V. Kartalopoulos 1982, “Time Compression Multiplexing for a Circuit Switched Digital Capability,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, COMM 30, 2046–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 5.14
    Bell Laboratories 1984, Special Issue Bell System Technical Journal dedicated to the SLC-96 Carrier, December, Vol. 63 No. 10, Part 2Google Scholar
  15. 5.15
    S.V. Ahamed, P.P. Bohn, N.L. Gottfried 1981, “A Tutorial on Two-Wire Digital Transmission in the Loop Plant,” IEEE Special Issue on Communications, COM-29, No 11, 1554–1564Google Scholar
  16. 5.16
    Bell Communications Research 1984, “Circuit Switched Digital Capability Network Access Interface Specification, Switched Network Compatibility and Performance Specifications for 2-Wire Connection to the Digital Public Switched Network,” TR-880-22135-84-01, Issue 1, JulyGoogle Scholar
  17. 5.17
    M.J. Miller and S.V. Ahamed 1988, Digital Transmission Systems and Networks, Volume II Applications, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, Chapter 5, 214–274Google Scholar
  18. 5.18
    G.S. Moschytz and S.V. Ahamed 1991, “Transhybrid Loss with RC Balance Circuits for Primary Rate ISDN Transmission Systems,” Special Issue of the 1991 IEEE J-SAC on High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line, Vol. 9, No. 6, August, 951–959Google Scholar
  19. 5.19
    Bell Communications Research 1987, “Characterization of Subscriber Loops for Voice and ISDN Services,” Science and Technology Series, ST-TSY-000041 Google Scholar
  20. 5.20
    J.J. Werner 1991, “The HDSL Environment,” Special Issue of the 1991 IEEE J-SAC on High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line, Vol. 9, No. 6, August, 785–800Google Scholar
  21. 5.21
    R.E. Bollen, R.P. Prabhu and J.W. Modestino 1985, “Digital Transmission Performance of GTE’s Local Loop,” IEE Third International Conference, London, England, March 18-21Google Scholar
  22. 5.22
    J.W. Modestino, C S. Massey, R.E. Bollen, and R P. Prabhu 1986, “Modeling and Analysis of Error Probability Performance for Digital Transmission Over the Two-Wire Loop Plant,” Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, J-SAC-4, No. 8, November, 1317–1330Google Scholar
  23. 5.23
    R.E. Bollen, “Standard for ISDN Basic Access Interface for Application at Network Side of the NT1,” T1D1.3 Contribution 85-003, February 5, 1985Google Scholar
  24. 5.24
    K. Mueler, C. Hidelberger 1993, Private Communication, Schmid Telecommunication, Zurich, Switzerland, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  25. 5.25
    A. Gillabert 1982, “Bestimmung der eleckrischen Eigenschaften des Ortsnetzes als Grundlage fur seine Digitalisierung,” Record of the PTT, Techniche Mitteilungen, Berne, Switzerland, 8–16Google Scholar
  26. 5.26
    S.V. Ahamed 1994, “Computer Based Optimization Techniques for the Design of HDSL,” International Conference on Communications Record, May 1-5, 811–820Google Scholar
  27. 5.27
    Martin Pollakowski, Hans-Werner Wellhausen 1995, “Eigenschaften Symmetrisher Ortsanschlutz-kabel im Frequenz-bereich bis 30 MHz,” ISSN 0015-010X, 49, Jahrgang Heft 9/10, September/OktoberGoogle Scholar
  28. 5.28
    K. Maki, K. Yoshida, and R. Komiya, “NTT’s Digital Subscriber Loop Transmission System and its Performance,” Private Communication Google Scholar
  29. 5.29
    R. Smith, J. Semple and N. Demytko, 1982, Telecom Australia, Research Laboratories, Victoria, Australia, 3168, Private Communication, JuneGoogle Scholar
  30. 5.30
    Korea Telecom, 1988, “Loop Survey,” SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  31. 5.31
    Wu-Jhy Chiu, Min-Jung Wu, Wen-King Hwang, and Shyue-Win Wei, 1991, “Loop Survey in the Taiwan Area and Feasibility Study for HDSL,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, J-SAC-9, No. 6, August, 801–809Google Scholar
  32. 5.32
    Gi-Hong Im and J.J. Werner 1993, “Bandwidth-Efficient Digital Transmission up to 155 Mbps over Unshielded Twisted Pair Wiring,” ICC Conference Record 93, May, Geneva, Switzerland, 1779–1803Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed V. Ahamed
    • 1
    • 2
  • Victor B. Lawrence
    • 2
  1. 1.City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Bell Labs Innovations Lucent Technologies HolmdelHolmdelUSA

Personalised recommendations