Skip to main content

The Impact of Changing Pig Welfare Preferences on the Economics of Pork Production-Marketing Chains

  • Chapter
Agricultural Marketing and Consumer Behavior in a Changing World

Abstract

Public concern about issues, such as, animal welfare and environmental pollution appears to be increasing in northwestern Europe and in the US (Guither and Curtis, 1983; Ekesbo, 1992; Barkema, 1993). This creates opportunities for selecting market segments to which more value can be offered through product differentiation. Demands of this type refer to a large extent, to the upstream farm stages of the so-called production-marketing chain, requiring that those consumer preferences be incorporated in all stages involved. In establishing product differentiation policies, animal welfare preferences and the additional cost of or profitability from production have to be balanced. To date, these aspects of animal welfare - perceptions and economics - have been analyzed neither extensively nor in an integrated manner. This paper elaborates on animal welfare in the pork chain, including the evaluation of its perception and economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barkema, A. (1993), “Reaching Consumers in the Twenty-first Century: The Short Way around the Barn,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 1126–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bens, P. (1994), “Idealisme nodig voor scharrelvarkens; extra arbeid brengt niet genoeg extra op,”Boerderij/Varkenshouderij, 79 (17), 10–11 (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattin, P. and D.R. Wittink (1982), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A survey,”Journal of Marketing, 46, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Ouden, M., R.B.M. Huirne, A.A. Dijkhuizen, and J.A. Renkema (1996a), “Computer Simulation of Costs and Benefits in a Production-Marketing Chain for Fresh Pork,” Submitted toAgricultural Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Ouden, M., J.T. Nijsing, A.A. Dijkhuizen and R.B.M. Huirne (1996b), “Economic Optimization of Pork Production-Marketing Chains. I. Model Input on Animal Welfare and Costs,”Livestock Production Science (accepted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Ouden, M., R.B.M. Huirne, A.A. Dijkhuizen and P. van Beek (1996c), “Economic Optimization of Pork Production-Marketing Chains. II. Modelling outcome,”Livestock Production Science (accepted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekesbo, I. (1992), “Animal Welfare: Ethics and Welfare in Meat Animal Husbandry,”Meat Focus InternationalOctober, 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbers, A.R.W. (1991), “The Use of Slaughterhouse Information in Monitoring Systems for Herd Health Control in Pigs,” Ph.D. thesis. University of Utrecht, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A.F., and D.M. Broom (1990)“Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare London: Bailliere Tindall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and V. Srinivasan (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,”Journal of Consumer Research5, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guither, H.D. and S.E. Curtis (1983), “Changing Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare and Animal Rights: The Meaning for the U.S. Food System,” TheFarm and Food System in Transition;Emerging Policy Issues no. 8, Cooperative Extension Service, Michigan State University, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, A. and K. Lundström (1992), “Meat Quality in Pigs Reared in Groups Kept as a Unit during the Fattening Period and Slaughter,”Animal Production54, 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C.S. (1990), “Food Safety: The Consumer Side of the Environmental Issue,”S. Journal ofAgricultural Economics22, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, B., V. Ruby, B.K. Pedersen, J. Smidth and V.A. Aarestrup Larsen (1994), “The Outdoor Pig Production in Denmark,” Proceedings 45th E.A.A.P., Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956)“Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. (1985), “De constructie van profielensets voor het schatten van hoofdeffecten en interacties bij conjunct meten,”Jaarboek van de Nederlandse Vereniging van Marktonderzoekers.Haarlem: De Vrieseborch, 125–154 (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. (1987), “Conjoint Measurement in Ham Quality Evaluation,”Journal of Agricultural Economics38, 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. and P.A.M. Oude Ophuis (1987), “Scharrelvarkensvlees: een alternatief voor gewoon varkensvlees?”Voeding(48), 9 (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybesma, W. (Ed.) (1981), “The Welfare of Pigs,” A seminar in the E.E.C. Programme of Coordination of Research on Animal Welfare held in Brussels, November 25–26, 1980. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S.S.L., D.M. Shackletin and R.M. Beames (1991), “The Effect of Mixing Unfamiliar Individuals on the Growth and Production of Finishing Pigs,”Animal Production52, 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Putten, G. and W.J. Elshof (1978), “Observations on the Effect of Transport on the Well-being and Lean Quality of Slaughter Pigs,”Animal Regulation Studies1, 247–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van ‘t Klooster, C.E. (1987), “Mogelijkheden tot verbouwing van volledig roostervloer-stallen tot gedeeltelijk roostervloer-en kistenstallen voor mestvarkens,” Report no. P. 1–2. Raalte: Varkensproefbedrijf ‘Noord-en Oost-Nederland’ (In Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeding, C.M., H.J. Guise and R.H.C. Penny (1993), “Factors Influencing the Welfare and Carcass and Meat Quality of Pigs: The Use of Water Sprays in Lairage,”Animal Production56, 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

den Ouden, M., Huirne, R.B.M., Dijkhuizen, A.A. (1997). The Impact of Changing Pig Welfare Preferences on the Economics of Pork Production-Marketing Chains. In: Wierenga, B., van Tilburg, A., Grunert, K., Steenkamp, JB.E.M., Wedel, M. (eds) Agricultural Marketing and Consumer Behavior in a Changing World. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7879-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6273-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics