Abstract
[ I ] Following the work by Barro (1974), which claimed that operative gift- or bequest- motive within each family line neutralizes the intergenerational redistributional effects of social security or government debt, various authors analyzed the household’s gift-bequest behavior in order to examine the validity of Barro’s reasoning [e. g., Carmichael (1982) and Burbidge (1983)], the conditions for operative gift- or bequest-motive [Weil (1987) and Abel (1987)], the optimality property of bequest equilibria [Bernheim ([1989)], and the causes and effects of social security [Laitner (1988) and Hansson and Stuart (1989)].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abel, Andrew B., 1987, Operative gift and bequest motives, American Economic Review 77, 1037–1047.
Barro, Robert J., 1974, Are government bonds net wealth?, Journal of Political Economy 82, 1095–1117.
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Oded Stark, 1988, Altruism within the family reconsidered: do nice guys finish last?, American Economic Review 78, 1034–1045.
Bernheim, B. Douglas, 1989, Intergenerational altruism, dynastic equilibria and social welfare, Review of Economic Studies 56, 119–128.
Buiter, Willem H. and Jeffrey Carmichael, 1984, Government debt: comment, American Economic Review 74, 762–765.
Burbidge, John B., 1983, Government debt in an overlappinggenerations model with bequests and gifts, American Economic Review 73, 222–227.
Burbidge, John B., 1984, Government debt: reply, American Economic Review 74, 766–767.
Carmichael, Jeffrey, 1982, On Barro’s theorem of debt neutrality: the irrelevance of net wealth, American Economic Review 72, 202–213.
Drazen, Allan, 1978, Government debt, human capital, and bequests in a life-cycle model, Journal of Political Economy 86, 505–516.
Hammond, Peter J. and James A. Mirrlees, 1973, Agreeable plans, in: James A. Mirrlees and N. H. Stern, eds., Models of economic growth, (MacMillan, London) 283–299.
Hansson, Ingemar and Charles Stuart, 1989, Social security as trade among living generations, American Economic Review 79, 1182–1195.
Hori, Hajime, 1988, Intergenerational utility dependence and income transfers, in: Y. Onitsuka and K. Iwai, eds., Gendai keizaigaku kenkyu; a volume in honor of professor Hirofumi Uzawa, (Tokyo University Press, Tokyo) 48–66 (in Japanese).
Hori, Hajime and Sadao Kanaya, 1989, Utility functional with nonpaternalistic intergenerational altruism, Journal of Economic Theory, 49, 241–265.
Kimball, Miles S., 1987, Making sense of two-sided altruism, Journal of monetary economics 20, 301–326.
Laitner, John, 1988, Bequests, gifts, and social security, Review of Economic Studies 55, 275–299.
Lindbeck, Assar and Jörgen W. Weibull, 1988, Altruism and time consistency: the economics of fait accompli, Journal of Political Economy 96, 1165–1182.
Strotz, Robert H., 1956, Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, Review of Economic Studies 23, 165–180.
Weil, Philippe, 1987, ‘Love thy children’: reflections on the Barro debt neutrality theorem, Journal of Monetary Economics 19, 377–391.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hori, H. (1996). Intergenerational Altruism and Income Transfers: Indeterminacy of Equilibria and Its Resolution. In: Sato, R., Ramachandran, R., Hori, H. (eds) Organization, Performance and Equity. Research Monographs in Japan-U.S. Business & Economics, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6267-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6267-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7876-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6267-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive