Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 24))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

The opportunity electric utilities now have to purchase power from independent producers can reduce overall cost and, thereby, benefit consumers. The full effects of this so-called purchase option have not been carefully considered, however, so we cannot really be sure that all of its effects are positive. Combining regulation with this potentially competitive element may not be efficient in every way; at least, that question has not been examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Averch, Harvey, and Leland L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review 52: 1052–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, Vijay S., and David S. Sibley. 1980. “Dynamic Behavior of a Firm Subject to Stochastic Regulatory Review.” International Economic Review 21: 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Annual 1990. 1992. Department of Energy, Publication DOE/IEIA-0348(90).

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Statistics of Privately Owned Electric Utilities. 1990. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interutility Bulk Power Transactions: Description, Economics and Data. 1983. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Frederick W. 1983. Input Biases under Rate of Return Regulation: A Test of an Intertemporal Averch-Johnson Model. Outstanding Dissertations in Economics, Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. Charles. 1993. “The Impending Restructuring of the Electric Utility Industry: Causes and Consequences.” Business Economics 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Energy Price and Expenditure. 1990. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utility Regulatory Policy in the United States and Canada, Compilation 1991-1992. 1992. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodríguez, R.R., Sherman, R. (1996). Electric Utility Efficiency with Independent Power Producers. In: Crew, M.A. (eds) Pricing and Regulatory Innovations Under Increasing Competition. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 24. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6249-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6249-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7867-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6249-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics