Skip to main content

Welfare, Stabilization or Growth: a Comparison of Different Fiscal Objectives

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper investigates a variety of objectives that are commonly used to motivate government fiscal action. These include, welfare maximization, stabilization and growth maximization. The policies are compared on the basis of their implications for welfare, volatility and growth. We show that stabilization policies can produce welfare levels that are nearly identical to those of welfare maximization policies and that both welfare maximization and stabilization policies yield large welfare gains and modest growth losses relative to growth maximization policies. We also show that there are side issues to stabilization polices. In particular: (1) It is not possible to stabilize all macroeconomic variables simultaneously, even when the number of policy instruments is equal to the number of shocks; (2) stabilizing a particular variable requires increased volatility of some other variable; (3) stabilization requires some flexibility regarding the government’s budget constraint; and, (4) stabilization requires the government to respond in a precise and immediate way to exogenous shocks which hit the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • K.J. Arrow. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29:155–173, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Barro and X. Sala-I-Martin. Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 89:645–661, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Barro. On the determination of public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87:940–971, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Baxter and R.G. King. Measuring business cycles: Approximate bandpass filters for economic time series. Working paper 5022, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.P. Cassou and K.J. Lansing. Optimal fiscal policy, public capital, and the productivity slowdown. Working paper 9509, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Chamley. Optimal taxation of capital income in a general equilibrium model with infinite lives. Econometrica, 54:607–622, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Christiano. A reexamination of the theory of automatic stabilizers. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 20:147–206, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Christiano. Why does inventory investment fluctuate so much? Journal of Monetary Economics, 21:247–280, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Chunrong and S.P. Cassou. A normative analysis of public capital. Applied Economics, 27:1201–1209, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.F. Cooley and Prescott E.C. Economic growth and business cycles. In T.F. Cooley, editor, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Glomm and Ravikumar B. Public investment in infrastructure in a simple growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18:1173–1187, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Greenwood and Huffman G.W. Tax analysis in a real business cycle model: on measuring harberger triangles and okun gaps. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27:167–190, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Greenwood, Z. Hercowitz and Huffman G.W. Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. American Economic Review, 78:402–417, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Greewood, R. Rogerson and R. Wright. Household production in real business cycle theory. In T.F. Cooley, editor, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Hercowitz, and Sampson M. Output growth, the real wage, and employment fluctuations. American Economic Review, 81:1215–1237, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.E. Jones, R. Manuelli and P.E. Rossi. Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 101:485–517, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.G. King, C.I. Plosser and S.T. Rebelo. Production, growth and business cycles I: the basic neoclassical model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21:195–232, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.R. Kocherlakota and K. Yi. Can convergence regressions distinguish between exogenous and endogenous growth models? Economics Letters, 49:211–215, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.E.J.. Lucas and N.L. Stokey. Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12:55–94, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.P Ramsey. A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37:47–61, 1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Romer. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94:1002–1037, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Smyth. Can “automatic stabilizers” be destabilizing? Public Finance, 18:357–363, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.B. Taylor. Comment on kydland and prescott. In S. Fischer, editor, Rational Expectations and Economic Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Zhu. Optimal fiscal policy in a stochastic growth model. Journal of Economic Theory, 58:250–289, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cassou, S.P., Lansing, K.J. (1997). Welfare, Stabilization or Growth: a Comparison of Different Fiscal Objectives. In: Hairault, JO., Hénin, PY., Portier, F. (eds) Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7830-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6173-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics