Skip to main content

Output Stabilization Versus Deficit Sustainability: Is it a Trade-Off ?

  • Chapter
Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability

Abstract

The adoption of tighter budget rules, including institutional restraints on the deficit that the government will be allowed to run, involves a cost by precluding automatic stabilization through the procyclical component of budget balance. This paper attempts to assess qualitatively the importance of this effect, by looking at the experience of main OECD countries over the last three decades. Our empirical approach is twofold. We first retain the cyclical sensitivity of the budget balance as a measure of automatic stabilizers and examine to which extent the strenght of this effect co-varies through time with a measure of sustainability. A second exercice considers the joint dynamics of GNP and budget balance, and attempts to evaluate the changes in GNP volatility involved by tighter budget adjustment rules. We generally find that the costs in terms of income stabilization of more sustainable budget rules are not important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • A. Alesina and A. Drazen. Why are stabilization delayed ? American Economic Review, 82:1170–1188, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Alesina and R. Perotti. Fiscal expansions and adjustments in oecd countries. Economic policy, 207–248, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bartolini, A. Razin and S. Symansky. G7 fiscal restructuring in the 1990’s: macroeconomic effects. Economic Policy, 20:111–146, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bayar and A. Dramais. Fiscal restructuring in europe — short and long term macroeconomic effects, miméo, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Bayoumi and B. Eichengreen. Restraining yourself: the implication of fiscal rules for economic stabilization. IMF Staff papers, 42(1):32–48, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Buiter, G. Corsetti and N. Roubini. Excessive deficits, sense and nonsense in the’ treaty of maastricht’. Economic Policy, 16:57–100, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Candelon and P.-Y. Hénin. IS government stabilizing ? a comparative assessment of contributions from expenditures, taxes and transfers. CEPREMAP Working Paper, 9608, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Christiano. A reexamination of the theory of automatic stabilization. Rochester Conference series in Public Policy, 20:147–203, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O.S. Hakkio and M. Rush. IS the deficit’ too large’? Economic Inquiry, 29:429–445, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Hansen. Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing: using covariates to increase power. Econometric Theory, 11:1148–1171, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Haug. Has federal budget deficit policy changed this years ? Economic Inquiry, 104–118, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.T. Mac Callum and J.K. Whitaker. The effectiveness of fiscal feedback rules and automatic stabilizers under rational expectations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 5:171–186, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Paisley and C. Salmon. HOW cyclical is the psbr ? working paper, Bank of England, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Ramey. HOW important is the credit channel in the transmission of monetary policy? Carnegie-Rochester conference series on Public Policy, 39:1–45, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Sheffrin. Taxation and automatic stabilizers. Public Finance, 36(1):99–107, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sutherland. Fiscal crises and aggregate demand: can high public debt reverse the effect of fiscal policy ? CPER Working Paper, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Trehan and C.E. Walsh. Common trends, the government budget constraint and revenue smoothing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12:425–444, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.D. Uri, J.W. Mixon and B.L. Kyer. Automatic stabilizers reconsidered. Public Finance, 44(3):476–491, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Weise. Severity of economic fluctuations under a balanced budget amendment. Contemporary Economic Policy, 14:26–41, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Candelon, B., Hénin, PY. (1997). Output Stabilization Versus Deficit Sustainability: Is it a Trade-Off ?. In: Hairault, JO., Hénin, PY., Portier, F. (eds) Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7830-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6173-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics