Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

The Economics of Biological Diversity Conservation

  • Chapter
Conservation Biology

  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

Economics is about choice. In a world where resources are finite relative to the demands that human beings make on them, choice is unavoidable. We cannot have everything. Choosing is the same as “trading off,” balancing the net gains from one course of action against an alternative action. The action of conserving biological diversity is not immune from this problem of making choices, although, as we shall see, some conservation literature appears to deny the choice, while some of it argues that the choice is there but that the tradeoff in favor of diversity destruction is unacceptable—biological diversity is somehow “special.” If choice is inevitable, if we cannot retain all the diversity that there is, how should such choices be made? What should be conserved and where? Few problems in economics are more complex than making choices in the context of biodiversity and no economist would argue that the problem is resolved. Nonetheless, economics offers some insights into biodiversity conservation policy and these are worth exploring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Adger, W.N., K. Brown, R. Cervigni, and D. Moran. 1995. Estimating the total economic value of forests in Mexico. Ambio 245:286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E., J. Burgess, T. Swanson, and D. Pearce. 1990. Elephants, economics and ivory. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braatz, S., G. Davis, S. Shen, and C. Rees. 1992. Conserving biological diversity: A strategy for protected areas in the Asia-Pacific region. World Bank Technical Paper 193. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. and D.W. Pearce, eds. 1994. The causes of tropical deforestation: The economic and statistical analysis of factors giving rise to the loss of the tropical forests. London: University College Press and Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. and D. Downes. 1995. What price biodiversity? Economic incentives and biodiversity conservation in the United States. Washington D.C.: Centre for International Environmental Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta, M., G. Carlson, and E. Lutz. 1994. An empirical assessment of farmers’ discount rates in Costa Rica and its implication for soil conservation. Washington D.C.: Environment Department, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein, E. and E.D. Wikramanayake. 1993. Beyond hotspots: How to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Paciflc region. Conservation Biology 7:53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. (1994), Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 345:45–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, S. and D.W. Pearce. 1994. The social costs of greenhouse gas emissions. In The economics of climate change, 71–86. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P. (1989). Changing patterns of variability in world cereal production. In Variability in grain yields. Implications for agricultural research and policy in developing countries, eds. J. Anderson and P. Hazell. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. and J. Dixon. 1988. Logging versus fisheries and tourism in Palawan. Occasional Paper No.7. Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICBP (International Council for Bird Preservation). 1992. Putting biodiversity on the map: Priority areas for global conservation. Cambridge: Birdlife International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, M., P.H. Williams, and G.M. Mace. 1994. Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishor, N. and L. Constantino. 1993. The costs and benefits of removing log export bans: evidence from two countries. Unpublished manuscript. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Laten Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., E. Mercer, and N. Sharma. 1994. Valuing tropical rain forest protection using the contingent valuation method. Unpublished manuscript. Durham, N.C.: School of the Environment, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, K. 1994. An environmental and economic assessment of forestry management options: a case study in Peninsular Malaysia. Chapter 6 of Sustainable forest management in Malaysia. Ph.D Thesis, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahar, D. and R. Schneider. 1994. Incentives for Tropical Deforestation: Some examples from Latin America. In The causes of tropical deforestation: The economic and statistical analysis of factor s giving rise to the loss of the tropical forests, eds. K. Brown and D.W. Pearce, 159–171. London: University College Press and Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. 1988. Primate diversity and the tropical forest: case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of the megadiversity countries. In Biodiversity, eds. E.O. Wilson and F.M. Peter, 145–154. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A. and T.B. Werner. 1990. Wealth of plants and animals unites “megadiversity countries.” Tropicus 4:4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D., D.W. Pearce, and A. Wendelaar. 1995. Investing in Biodiversity: An Economic Perspective on Global Priorities. University College London and University of East Anglia: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1988. Threatened biotas: “hot spots” in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8:187–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1990. The biodiversity challenge: Expanded hot-spots analysis. The Environmentalist 10:243–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1996. Making markets work for biological diversity: the role of economic incentive measures. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W. and D. Moran. 1994. The economic value of biodiversity. London: Earthscan and Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W. 1995. New Ways of Financing Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 5:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W., N. Adger, K. Brown., R. Cervigni, and D. Moran. 1993. Mexico forestry and conservation sector review: Substudy of economic valuation of forests. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) for World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Country Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. 1994. Energy, externalities and environmental quality: Will development cure the ills it creates? Energy Studies Review 6:199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C., A. Gentry, and R. Mendelsohn. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339:655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R., T. Lovejoy, and M. Soulé. 1992. Global warming and biological diversity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S., A. Solow, and J. Broadus. 1993. Searching for uncertain benefits and the conservation of biological diversity. Environmental and Resource Economics 3:171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. 1990. Land transformation. In The Earth as transformed by human action: Global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years, eds. B. Turner, W. Clark, and W. Kates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruitenbeek, J. 1992. The rainforest supply price: A tool for evaluating rainforest conservation expenditures. Ecological Economics 1:57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. 1994. Government and the economy on the Amazon frontier, Latin America, and the Caribbean technical department report no. 34. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, A., S. Polasky, and J. Broadus. 1993. On the measurement of biological diversity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24:60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, D., R. Sierra, and L. Brown. 1989. The causes of tropical deforestation in Ecuador: A statistical analysis. London: London Environmental Economics Centre, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., M. Mortimore, and F. Gichuki. 1994. More people less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya. London: Wylie and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., C.J. Humphries, and P.H. Williams. 1991. What to protect—systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55:235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K.M. and J.W. Duffield. 1992. Natural resource damages: Law and economics. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. 1992. On diversity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 57:363–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. 1995. Diversity functions. In Biological diversity: Economic and ecological issues, eds. C. Perrings, C. Folke, C.S. Holling, B.O. Jansson, and K.-G. Mäler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1991. Malaysia: Forestry subsector study. Report 9775-MA. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre). 1992. Global biodiversity: Status of the Earth’s living resources. Cambridge: WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David Pearce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominic Moran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132, USA

    Peggy L. Fiedler

  2. Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA

    Peter M. Kareiva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearce, D., Moran, D. (1998). The Economics of Biological Diversity Conservation. In: Fiedler, P.L., Kareiva, P.M. (eds) Conservation Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6051-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6051-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-09661-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6051-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation