Skip to main content

Estuarine Ecosystem Issues on the Chesapeake Bay

  • Chapter

Abstract

On a global basis, estuarine systems constitute a small percentage (~0.5 percent) of the world’s oceanic areas. However, the very high fisheries production (~21 percent of world’s catch), proximity to major urban areas and transportation networks, and the use of these areas for recreational purposes make them far more important than indicated by spatial extent alone (Houde and Rutherford 1993). In part because of the location of these systems at the margin between land and ocean, serious degradation has become widespread during the last few decades. If current demographic projections are correct, we should expect that human activities in the coastal zone will continue to intensify. In 1988, for example, the average population density in coastal counties in the northeast region of the United States (Maine to Virginia) was about 340 people per square mile; it is expected to increase by an additional 30 percent by 2010. Sediments, nutrients, and an array of toxic materials will probably find their way into these aquatic systems, leading to further declines in water quality, habitat conditions and living resources, especially if these areas do not have effective management programs (Culliton et al. 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boicourt, W. C. 1992. Influences of circulation processes on dissolved oxygen in the Chesapeake Bay, p. 7–60. In D. E. Smith, M. Leffler and G. Mackiernan (eds.)Oxygen Dynamics in the Chesapeake Bay: A Synthesis of Recent ResearchMaryland Sea Grant Program, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summers and W. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries(in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. R. and G. S. Brush. 1991. Long -term history of Chesapeake Bay anoxia.Science254:992–996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culliton, T. J., M. A. Warren, T. R. Goodspeed, D. G. Remer, C. M. Blackwell, and J. J. McDonough III. 1990. The Second Report of a Coastal Trends Series-50 Years of Population Change Along the Nation’s Coasts. 1960–2010. Strategic Assessment Branch, Ocean Assessments Division, Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. and M. Oppenheimer. 1991. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition and the Chesapeake Bay estuary.Ambio20(3):102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funderburk, S. L.; J. A. Mihurskv, S. J. Jordan, and D. Riley (eds). 1991.Habitat Requirements for Chesapeake Bay Living Resources.Chesapeake Research Consortium. Inc.. Solomons. MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, L. W.. Jr. 1994. Long-terns trends in the distribution of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: roles of light. nutrients and streamflow.Marine Ecology Progress Series104:267–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houde, E. D. and E. S. Rutherford. 1993. Recent trends in estuarine fisheries: Predictions of fish production and yield.Estuaries16(2):161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, N. A., P. M. Groffman, A. A. Keller and J. C. Prager. 1992. A watershed nitrogen and phosphorus balance: The upper Potomac River basin.Estuaries15(1):83–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. W., H. J. Speir, N. H. Gutowski, R. O’Reilly. L. Gillingham, and E. Smoller. 1990.Chesapeake Barr Fisheries. Status. Trends. Priorities and Data Needs.ASMF-MD-0048. Versar. Inc.. Columbia. MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W. M.; W. R. Boynton; R. R. Twilley; J. C. Stevenson, and J.C. Means. 1984. The decline of submerged vascular plants in upper Chesapeake Bay: Summary of results concerning possible causes.Marine Techonology Society Journal17(2):78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, U.. R. Elmgren and F. Wulff. 1985. Eutrophication and the Baltic Sea: Causes and consequences.Arnbio14:9–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugbill, J. 1990.Potomac Ricer Basin Nutrient Inventory.The Metropolitan Council of Governments. Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnien, R. E., D. K. Austin and B. D. Michael. 1990.Chemical/Physical Properties Component. Level I Data Report. Maryland Department of the Environment. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program. Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. C.; W. Boynton, T. Horton and C. Stevenson. 1994. Nutrient loadings to surface waters: Chesapeake Bay case study. p. 8–38. In Uman S.(ed.).Keeping Pace with Science and Engineering.National Academy Press, Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W. 1988. Physical energy inputs and the comparative ecology of lake and marine ecosystents.Limnology and Oceanography33:1005–1025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W., C.D. Hunt, and B.L. Nowicki. 1986. The retention of nutrients(C.N.P.),heavy metals(Mn,Cd,Pb,Cu),and petroleum hydro carbons in Narragansett Bay, p.99–122. In P. Lasserre and J. M. Martin (eds)Biogeochemical Processes at the Land-Sea Boundary.Elsevier Oceanography Series, 43. New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. W. 1952. Estuarine hydrography. InAdvances in Geophysics1:243–280. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. C., L. W. Stayer and K. W. Stayer. 1993. Water quality associated with survival of submersed aquatic vegetation along an estuarine gradient.Estuaries16(2):346–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1983.Chesapeake Bay: A Profile of Environmental Change.Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992.Chesapeake Bay Program. Progress Report of the Baywide Nutrient Reduction Reevaluation.Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993.Take Pride in Chesapeake Bay.Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, F., A. Stigebrandt and L. Rahm. 1990. Nutrient dynamics of the Baltic.Ambio14(3):126–133.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boynton, W.R. (1997). Estuarine Ecosystem Issues on the Chesapeake Bay. In: Simpson, R.D., Christensen, N.L. (eds) Ecosystem Function & Human Activities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6049-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6049-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-09671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6049-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics