Abstract
Our understanding of how ecosystems function has expanded enormously since the term was first defined as a dynamical system consisting of a biological entity, typically a regional biota (community), together with its environment by Alfred George Tansley in 1935. In his analysis of the history of the ecosystem concept, Golley (1993) concluded that “the ecosystem, for some at least, has provided a basis for moving beyond strictly scientific questions to deeper questions of how humans should live with each other and the environment. In that sense, the ecosystem concept continues to grow and develop as it serves a larger purpose.” Indeed, many societal questions related to the environment are ecosystem related (Odum 1989; Cairns et al. 1992). Here, I emphasize the ongoing national debate about wetlands, such as those that occur in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, to demonstrate the utility of the ecosystem concept. I begin with an overview of the ecosystem concept and how it is being applied when decisions have been made about the use, restoration, or conservation of natural resources. I then discuss the importance of separating ecological “functions” from societal “values” when applying the ecosystem concept.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adamus, P. R. 1987.Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET): Volume II-Methodology.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Adamus, P.. and L. T. Stockwell. 1983.A Method for Wetland Functional Assessment Volume I.Office of Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Adamus, P. R., L. T. Stockwell, F. J. Clarain, Jr., M. E. Morrow, L. E. Rozas, and R. D. Smith. 1991.Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) Volume I: Literature Review and Evaluation Rationale.Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Bender, M. J., Johnson, G. V., and S. P. Simonovic. 1994. Sustainable management of renewable resources: a comparison of alterative decision approaches.International Journal of Sustainable Development andWorldEcology 1:77–88.
Brinson, M. M. 1993.A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands Research Program. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Washington, DC.
Brinson, M. M., W. Kruczynski, L. C. Lee, W. L. Nutter, R. D. Smith, and D. F. Whigham. 1994. Developing an approach for assessing the functions of wetlands. pp. 615–624. In W.J. Mitsch (ed.)Global Wetlands: Old WorldandNew.Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brinson, M. M., F.R. Hauer, L. C. Lee, W. L. Nutter, R. D. Rheinhardt, R. D. Smith, D. F. Whigham. 1995.A Guidebook for Application of Hydrogeomorphic Assessments to Riverine Wetlands.Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-11, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Brown, T. C. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation.Land Economics 60:231–246.
Cairns. John Jr., B. R. Niederlehner, and D. R. Orvos, 1992.Predicting Ecosystem Risk. Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., Inc.. Princeton, NJ.
Dahm, C. N. (Guest editor). 1995. Special Issue: Kissimmee River Restoration.Restoration Ecology3(3):145–238.
Davis, S. 1994. Phosphorus inputs and vegetation sensitivity in the Everglades. pp. 357–378. In S. Davis and J. Ogden (eds.).Everglades: The Ecosystem and its Restoration.St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
Davis, S. and J. Ogden (eds.). 1994. Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach. FL.
Dennison, W. C., R. J. Orth, K. A. Moore, J. C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P. W. Bergstrom, and R. A. Batiuk, 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation.BioScience43:86–94.
Franklin, J. F. 1995. Scientists in wonderland.BioScience Supplement74–78.
Frayer, W. E. and J. M. Hefner. 1991.Florida Wetlands. Status and Trends. 1970s to 1980s.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta. GA.
Gillis, A.M. 1990. The new forestry.BioScience40:558–562.
Golley, F. B. 1993. AHistory of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology.Yale University Press, New Haven. CT.
Gunderson, L. H., S.S. Light, and C.S. Rolling, 1995. Lessons from the Everglades.BioScience Supplement66–73.
Horton, T. and W. M. Eichbaum, 1991.Turning the Tide: Saving the Chesapeake Bay.Island Press. Washington. DC.
Larson, J. S. and D. B. Mazzarese. 1994. Rapid assessment of wetlands: History and application to management. pp. 625–636. In W.J. Mitsch (ed.)Global Wetlands: Old World and New.Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Light, S. S. and J. W. Dineen. 1994. Water control in the Everglades: A historical perspective. pp. 47–83. In. S. Davis and J. Ogden (eds.)Everglades: The Ecosystem and its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
Lovejoy, T. E. 1995. Will expectedly the top blow off?BioScience Supplement3–6.
Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993.Wetlands2nd edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.. New York, NY.
National Academy of Sciences. 1995.Wetlands: CharacteristicsandBoundariesNational Academy Press. Washington, DC.
Odum, E. P. 1989.Ecology and Our Endangered Life-Support Systems. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Odum, H. T. 1983.Systems Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Peters, R. H. 1991.A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Richardson, C. J. 1994. Ecological functions and human values in wetlands: a framework for assessing forestry impacts.Wetlands14:1–9.
Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, P. Garrett, and M. M. Brinson, In press. An approach for assessing wetland functions using Hydrogeomorphic Classification reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetlands Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report WRP-DE-9. Vicksburg, MS.
Taylor, J. R., M. A. Cardamone, W. J. Mitsch. 1990. Bottomland hardwood forests: Their functions and values. pp. 13–88. In. J.G. Gosselink, L.C. Lee, and T.A. Muir, (eds.), Ecological Processes and Cumulative Impacts: Illustrated by Bottomland Hardwood Ecosystems.Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
Tiner, R. W. and D. G. Burke. 1995.Wetlands of Maryland.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, Region 5. Hadley, MA.
van Wilgen, B., R. M. Cowling, and C. J. Burgers. 1996. Valuation of ecosystem services.Bioscience46:184–189.
Willcox, L. 1995. The Yellowstone experience.BioScience Supplement79–83.
Zedler, J. B. 1995. Reinventing wetland science.National Wetlands Newsletter17:1, 17–20.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whigham, D.F. (1997). Ecosystem Functions and Ecosystem Values. In: Simpson, R.D., Christensen, N.L. (eds) Ecosystem Function & Human Activities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6049-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6049-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-09671-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6049-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive