Skip to main content

A Feeling for the Organism? An Empirical Look at Gender and Research Choices of Animal Behaviorists

  • Chapter
Feminism and Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

There has been a surge of interest in women in science over the past decade. Women scientific professionals have been sharing their stories and building stronger support networks. Concurrently, the number of feminist scholars focusing on the sciences is growing at a great pace. Researchers in various other fields also are comparing the professional behavior of women and men, and exploring the possible contribution of gender to the diversity of approaches to scientific work (Brush, 1991; Zuckerman, Cole, and Bruer, 1991; Science 1992, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agresti, A. 1989. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aisenberg, N. and M. Harrington. 1988. Women in Academe: Outsiders in the Sacred Grove. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitkin, M., D. Anderson, B. Francis, and J. Hinde. 1989. Statistical modelling in GLIM. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., B. M. Clincher, N. R. Goldberger, N. Rule, and J. M. Tarule. 1986. Women’s Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benditt, J. (Ed.) 1992. Women in Science. Science 255:1365–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, R. 1984. Sociobiology, biological determinism, and human behavior. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women, pp. 15–48. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, R. 1986. Sex differences research: science or belief? In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, pp. 147–164. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G. 1991. Women in science and engineering. American Scientist 79:404–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. 1991. Moving the mountain: A history of the women’s movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. 1994. Science and the successful female: Why there are so many women primatologists. American Anthropologist 96:529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. and L. Fedigan. 1989. Gender and the study of primates. In S. Morgan (Ed.), Gender and Anthropology: Implications for Teaching and Research. pp. 41–58. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fee, E. 1986. Critiques of modern science: The relationship of feminism to other radical epistemologies. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science pp. 42–56. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., N. Green, and C. Payne, Eds. 1993. GLIM4. The Statistical System for Generalized Linear Interactive Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. 1992. Evolutionary biology and feminism. Human Nature 3:217–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E. and H. Lytton, Eds. 1988. Social Development: History, Theory, and Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1981. The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, pp. 119–145. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. 1990. The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick, NI: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. J. 1991. Is fieldwork feminine? Women’s Review of Books VIII: 19–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. 1980. Sociobiology: Another biological determinism. International Journal of Health Services 10:347–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, M. and R. Hubbard. 1979. Sociobiology and biosociology: Can science prove the biological basis of sex differences in behavior? In R. Hubbard and M. Lowe (Eds.), Genes and Gender II: Pitfalls in Research on Sex and Gender, pp. 91–112. Staten Island, NY: Gordian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H. and Romney, D. M. 1991. Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: Ameta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 109:267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matyas, M. L. and L. S. Dix, eds. 1992. Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women? Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. 1989. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, S. 1991. Walking with the Great Apes: Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey, Biruté Galdikas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morell, V. 1993. Called “Trimates,” three bold women shaped their field. Science 260:420–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1991. Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing Their Numbers in the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S.V. 1990. Female-Friendly Science: Applying Women’s Studies Methods and Theories to Attract Students. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, S. V. 1992. Biology and Feminism: A Dynamic Interaction. New York: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science. 1992. Women in science. Science 255:1365–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science. 1993. Women in science’ 93: Gender and culture. Science 260:383–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trexel, J. C. and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74:1629–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Ascent of Man 1871–1971, pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger, J. F. 1981. Animal Social Behavior. Boston: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn-Waxier, C. 1993. Warriors and worriers: Gender and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology 5:79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H., J. R. Cole, and J. T. Bruer, eds. 1991. The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. New York: WW. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmes, D.J., Hitchcock, C.L. (1997). A Feeling for the Organism? An Empirical Look at Gender and Research Choices of Animal Behaviorists. In: Gowaty, P.A. (eds) Feminism and Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5985-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-07361-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5985-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics