Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Physics of Atoms and Molecules ((PAMO))

  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

The differential cross section for double photoionization of helium provides a sensitive tool for exploring electron-electron correlation since the absorption of one photon cannot lead to double escape without the two electrons interacting. However, differential cross sections for double photoionization are neither easy to calculate nor easy to measure. Moreover, while a great deal has been learned about the dynamics of double photoionization since the pioneering work by Wannier1 in 1953, a complete understanding has yet to be achieved. Over the last several years we have developed a method,2,3 based on the earlier work of Rudge and Seaton,4 for calculating differential cross sections for double photoionization of helium. In this paper we present some of our results and we compare them with selected data from recent measurements in the energy range 0 to 80 eV above threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 90, 817 (1953).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. R. H. Rudge and M. J. Seaton, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 283, 262 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Proulx and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 48, R875 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Pont and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 51, R2676 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Maulbetsch and J. S. Briggs, J. Phys. B 26, 1679 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dalgarno, H. Doyle, and M. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1051 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Schwarzkopf, B. Krässig, V. Schmidt, F. Maulbetsch, and J. S. Briggs, J. Phys. B 27, L347 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Schwarzkopf and V. Schmidt, J. Phys. B 28, 2847 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Schmidt, J. Phys. B 29, 1877 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Pont and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 53, 3671 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Huetz, P. Selles, D. Waymel, and J. Mazeau, J. Phys. B 24, 1917 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Pont and R. Shakeshaft, J. Phys. B 28, L571 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Kossmann, V. Schmidt, and T. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1266 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kossmann, Ph D Thesis, Freiburg University (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Bizau and F. J. Wuilleumier, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 71, 205 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Dörner, T. Vogt, V. Mergel, H. Khemliche, S. Kravis, C. L. Cocke, J. Ullrich, M. Unverzagt, L. Spielberger, M. Damrau, O. Jagutzki, I. Ali, B. Weaver, K. Ullmann, C. C. Hsu, M. Jung, E. P. Kanter, B. Sonntag, M. H. Prior, E. Rotenberg, J. Denlinger, T. Warwick, S. T. Manson, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2654 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. W. Byron and C. W. Joachain, Phys. Rev. 164, 1 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F. H. Read, J. Phys. B 17, 3965 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Hammond, F. H. Read, S. Cvejanovic, and G. C. King, J. Phys. B 18, L141 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Dörner, J. Feagin, C. L. Cocke, H. Bräuning, O. Jagutzki, M. Jung, E. P. Kanter, H. Khemliche, S. Kravis, V. Mergel, M. H. Prior; H. Schmidt-Böcking, L. Spielberger, J. Ullrich, M. Unverzagt, T. Vogt, Phys. Rev. Lett. in press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Pont and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A in press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Feagin, J. Phys. B in press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Lablanquie, J. Mazeau, L. Andric, P. Selles, and A. Huetz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2192 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pont, M., Shakeshaft, R. (1997). Double Photoionization of Helium. In: Burke, P.G., Joachain, C.J. (eds) Photon and Electron Collisions with Atoms and Molecules. Physics of Atoms and Molecules. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5917-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5917-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7713-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5917-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics