Skip to main content

Theoretical Foundations of Dual Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • 242 Accesses

Abstract

The conceptual design of most computer-based information systems reflects the design/use dualism of technology. During the development phase, part of the work-domain related knowledge is formalized and encoded in the software, making it difficult for users to reflect upon and use this knowledge. This dualism deters the interpretive flexibility of information systems. Dual Information Systems (DIS) are needed that enable and reinforce both efficient, institutionalized working and the questioning and reconstruction of computer-supported work routines.

This paper outlines a research framework for answering three research questions: (1) What is the conceptual design of DIS? (2) How can DIS be designed? (3) What kind of social processes and structures facilitate or impede the creation of DIS.

The main contributions of this paper are the conceptual design of DIS, its organization scientifc backing, and the hyperknowledge organization design that enables and is enabled by DIS. The paper also suggests ways to assess and develop further the conceptual design of DIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson W.L., 1991, Group Relations Psychology and Computer Supported Work, Some New Directions for Research and Development. Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems (COCS ′91), SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 2 & 3, pp. 117–122, ACM.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, 1990, Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansler J.P., and Bødker K., 1993, A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context.ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook S.D.N., and Yanow D., 1993, Culture and Organizational Learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 2, No. 4, December 1993, pp. 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra C.U., and Lanzara G.F., 1994, Formative Contexts and Information Technology. Accounting, Management & Information Technologies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis A.M., 1990, Software requirements: Analysis and Specification. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson I., and Nurminen M.I., 1991, Doing by Learning: Embedded Application Systems. Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser L., 1986, The Integration of Computing and Routine Work. ACM Transactions of Office Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman J.R., 1986, The Psychology of Self-Management in Organizations. In M.S. Pallack and R. O. Perloff, (Eds.), Psychology and Work: Productivity, Change, and Employment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 89–136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund G., and Nonaka I., 1993, Models of Knowledge Management in the West and Japan. In P. Lorange, C. Chakravarthy, J. Roos and A. Van de Ven (Eds.), Implementing Strategic Processes: Change, Learning and Cooperation. Basil Blackwell, London, pp. 117–

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz J., and Gilmore T., 1990, The Splitting of Leadership and Management as a Social Defense. Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KäkÖlä T., 1995a, Increasing the Interpretive Flexibility of Information Systems through Embedded Application Systems. Accounting, Management & Information Technologies, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KäkÖlä T., 1995b, Designing and Deploying Coordination Technologies for Fostering Organizational Working and Learning: From Vision to Reality? Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • KäkÖlä T., 1996, Dual Information Systems in Hyperknowledge Organizations. Ph.D. Dissertation. TUCS Dissertations No. 2, August 1996. Turku Centre for Computer Science and University of Turku, Department of Computer Science, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowshowitz, 1976, The Conquest of Will: Information Processing in Human Affairs. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E., 1983, Designing Human Systems. Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I., 1994, A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurminen M. I., 1988, People or Computers: Three Ways of Looking at Information Systems. Studentlitteratur & Chartwell-Bratt, Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W., 1991, Integrated Information Environment or Matrix of Control? The Contradictory Implications of Information Technology. Accounting, Management & Information Technologies, Vol. 1., No. 1, pp. 9–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W., 1992, The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perin C, 1991, Electronic Social Fields in Bureaucracies. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein G., 1992, Organization Design Viewed as a Group Process Using Coordination Technology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MCC Technical Report CT-039-92, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P., 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday Currency, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyre M.J., and Orlikowski W.J., 1994, Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. Organization Science,V61. 5, No. 1, pp. 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls J., Widmeyer G., and El Sawy O., 1992, Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick K., 1979, The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S., 1988, In the Age of the Smart Machine — The Future of Work and Power. Heinemann Professional Publishing Ltd. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Käkölä, T. (1997). Theoretical Foundations of Dual Information Systems. In: Wojtkowski, W.G., Wojtkowski, W., Wrycza, S., Zupančič, J. (eds) Systems Development Methods for the Next Century. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7712-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5915-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics