Skip to main content

How Shared is Shared Understanding in Information Requirements Determination?

  • Chapter
  • 242 Accesses

Abstract

The task of determining information requirements for information systems is notoriously challenging and a number of contributing difficulties have been ascribed as causal factors including the problem of achieving a shared understanding of information requirements. However, a ubiquitous and perhaps naive assumption has always been that approaches which explicate ‘shared understanding’ do just that ie they achieve a very high degree of mutual understanding between participants. The findings in this paper contradict that view. An approach which is well-respected for its ability to facilitate shared understanding, SODA (Strategic Options Development and Analysis) and its associated technique of cognitive mapping were applied in an action research project in which the degree of mutual understanding between individual participants was measured by cross-tabulating individual cognitive maps. A qualitative data analysis was then performed. The findings demonstrate that in this case at least, espoused ‘shared understanding’ was limited. The paper also describes how further steps were successfully introduced which appear to improve the degree of mutual understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, F., Cropper, S., Eden, C., and Cook, J. (1991) Cognitive mapping for policy analysis in the public sector. Paper presented a the American Academy of Management Conference, Miami, USA, August 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, R.P. and Heinen, J.S. (1977) MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, R.P. and Thomas, B.D. (1983) Achieving excellence in communications: a key to developing complete, accurate, and shared requirements. In Awad, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11): 1268–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, B.L. and Hawk, S.R. (1988) Differences in analyst’s attitudes towards information systems development: evidence and implications. Information & Management, 14 (1988): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumdum, U.R. and Klein, H.K. (1986) The need for organizational requirements analysis. In H.E. Nissen and G. Sandstrom (eds.) Quality of Work versus Quality of Information Systems: 393–420. Report of the Ninth Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, Lund, August 19-22, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1988) Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36 (1988): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1989) Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1995) On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS’s. European Journal of Operational Research, 81 (1995): 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDP Analyzer (1977) Getting the requirements right. EDP Analyzer, 15(7): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewusi-Mensah, K. and Przasnyski, Z.H. (1994) Factors contributing to the abandonment of information systems development projects. Journal of Information Technology, 9(1994): 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G. (1990) Achieving flexible information systems: the case for approved analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 5: 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D.J. (1992) Information systems requirements: determination and analysis. McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremantle Port Authority (1993) Strategic and Business Plan 1993/94–1995/96: Charting for Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. (1989) The strategic choice approach. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1995) Management meltdown. Open Computing, January (1995): 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldkuhl, G. and Rostlinger, A. (1993) Joint elicitation of problems: important aspects of change analysis. In D. Avison, J.E. Kendall, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Human, Organizational and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development (A-24): 107–125. Elsevier Science, North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R.A. (1985) Office automation: a social and organizational perspective. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. (1995) Sketchy plans, politics stall software development. Computerworld, 29(25): 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1991) Systems Methodologies for the Management Sciences. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, M.A., Woo, C.C. and Smith, L.D. (1993) Information systems development and communicative action theory. Information & Management, 25 (1993): 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K.M. (1985) The relationship of cognitive style to the derivation of information requirements. Computer Personnel, 10 (1985): 2-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keider, S.P. (1984) Why systems development projects fail. Journal of Information Systems Management, 1 (1984): 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korac-Boisvert, N. and Kouzmin, A. (1995) IT development: methodology overload or crisis? Science Communication, 17(1): 57–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, A.L. and Nath, R. (1991) Managing organizational issues in information systems development. Journal of Systems Management, 42(Nov): 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., Lee, S. and Durgee, J. (1994) Deep structures: real information requirements determination. Information & Management, 27 (1994): 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P.H., Atkinson, D.J., Ee, L. and McKay, J. (1993) Computer-aided problem solving: an overview of successful methodologies. The Environmental Professional, 15(2): 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. (1994) The application of soft management science/operational research to information systems requirements analysis: a study using cognitive mapping and the SODA methodology. Candidacy Research Proposal for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. and Marshall, P. (1993) The implications of new developments in management science for information systems planing and development. School of Information Systems Working Paper Series 93.02, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J., Marshall, P. and McDermid, D. (1994a) Cognitive mapping for information requirements determination in the learning organisation. In Baets, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Information Systems, University of Nijenrode, Netherlands: 759–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J., Marshall, P.H. and McDermid, D.C. (1994b) Meeting the challenge of information requirements determination in the learning organisation. In P. Kerola, A. Juustila and J. Jarvinen (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th IRIS, University of Oulu, Finland, August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. (1996) The application of soft management science/operational research to information systems requirements analysis: a study using cognitive mapping and the SODA methodology. Unpublished PhD thesis (in progress), Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, J.T. and Sherr, D.M. (1984) “Getting the requirements right ” vs. “Getting the system working”-Evolutionary development. In Bemelmans, T. (ed.) Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. (1984) A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56: 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, H.U., Dingley, S. and Golder, P.A. (1994) Bridging the culture gap between users and developers. Journal of Systems Management, 45 (July): 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shand, R.M. (1994) User manuals as project management tools: part I-theoretical background. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37(2): 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi, J. and Shekaran, M.C. (1996) Requirements engineering: the emerging wisdom. IEEE Software, 13(2): 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, M. (1993) Using communication theory for systems design: a model for eliciting information requirements. In D. Avison, J.E. Kendall, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Human, Organizational and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development (A-24): 241–262. Elsevier Science, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. and George, J.F. (1992) Group support for analysis and design. Informatica, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1989) A systems methodology for information requirements analysis. In Klein, H. and Kumar, K. (eds.) Systems Development for Human Progress. Elsevier Science, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. and Olson, M.H. (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly, 13(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, (1982) Understanding the professional programmer. Little Brown, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Harper, A.T., Antill, L. and Avison, D.E. (1985,) Information systems definition: the Multiview approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKay, J., Marshall, P., McDermid, D. (1997). How Shared is Shared Understanding in Information Requirements Determination?. In: Wojtkowski, W.G., Wojtkowski, W., Wrycza, S., Zupančič, J. (eds) Systems Development Methods for the Next Century. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7712-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5915-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics