Abstract
The task of determining information requirements for information systems is notoriously challenging and a number of contributing difficulties have been ascribed as causal factors including the problem of achieving a shared understanding of information requirements. However, a ubiquitous and perhaps naive assumption has always been that approaches which explicate ‘shared understanding’ do just that ie they achieve a very high degree of mutual understanding between participants. The findings in this paper contradict that view. An approach which is well-respected for its ability to facilitate shared understanding, SODA (Strategic Options Development and Analysis) and its associated technique of cognitive mapping were applied in an action research project in which the degree of mutual understanding between individual participants was measured by cross-tabulating individual cognitive maps. A qualitative data analysis was then performed. The findings demonstrate that in this case at least, espoused ‘shared understanding’ was limited. The paper also describes how further steps were successfully introduced which appear to improve the degree of mutual understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann, F., Cropper, S., Eden, C., and Cook, J. (1991) Cognitive mapping for policy analysis in the public sector. Paper presented a the American Academy of Management Conference, Miami, USA, August 1991.
Bostrom, R.P. and Heinen, J.S. (1977) MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3): 17–32.
Bostrom, R.P. and Thomas, B.D. (1983) Achieving excellence in communications: a key to developing complete, accurate, and shared requirements. In Awad, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference, New York.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11): 1268–1287.
Dos Santos, B.L. and Hawk, S.R. (1988) Differences in analyst’s attitudes towards information systems development: evidence and implications. Information & Management, 14 (1988): 31–41.
Dumdum, U.R. and Klein, H.K. (1986) The need for organizational requirements analysis. In H.E. Nissen and G. Sandstrom (eds.) Quality of Work versus Quality of Information Systems: 393–420. Report of the Ninth Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, Lund, August 19-22, 1986.
Eden, C. (1988) Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36 (1988): 1–13.
Eden, C. (1989) Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester.
Eden, C. (1995) On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS’s. European Journal of Operational Research, 81 (1995): 302–311.
EDP Analyzer (1977) Getting the requirements right. EDP Analyzer, 15(7): 1–14.
Ewusi-Mensah, K. and Przasnyski, Z.H. (1994) Factors contributing to the abandonment of information systems development projects. Journal of Information Technology, 9(1994): 185–201.
Fitzgerald, G. (1990) Achieving flexible information systems: the case for approved analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 5: 5–11.
Flynn, D.J. (1992) Information systems requirements: determination and analysis. McGraw-Hill, London.
Fremantle Port Authority (1993) Strategic and Business Plan 1993/94–1995/96: Charting for Excellence.
Friend, J. (1989) The strategic choice approach. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Wiley, Chichester.
Garner, R. (1995) Management meltdown. Open Computing, January (1995): 36–42.
Goldkuhl, G. and Rostlinger, A. (1993) Joint elicitation of problems: important aspects of change analysis. In D. Avison, J.E. Kendall, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Human, Organizational and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development (A-24): 107–125. Elsevier Science, North Holland
Hirschheim, R.A. (1985) Office automation: a social and organizational perspective. Wiley, Chichester.
King, J. (1995) Sketchy plans, politics stall software development. Computerworld, 29(25): 81.
Jackson, M. (1991) Systems Methodologies for the Management Sciences. Wiley, Chichester.
Janson, M.A., Woo, C.C. and Smith, L.D. (1993) Information systems development and communicative action theory. Information & Management, 25 (1993): 59–72.
Kaiser, K.M. (1985) The relationship of cognitive style to the derivation of information requirements. Computer Personnel, 10 (1985): 2-12.
Keider, S.P. (1984) Why systems development projects fail. Journal of Information Systems Management, 1 (1984): 33–38.
Korac-Boisvert, N. and Kouzmin, A. (1995) IT development: methodology overload or crisis? Science Communication, 17(1): 57–89.
Lederer, A.L. and Nath, R. (1991) Managing organizational issues in information systems development. Journal of Systems Management, 42(Nov): 23–39.
Leifer, R., Lee, S. and Durgee, J. (1994) Deep structures: real information requirements determination. Information & Management, 27 (1994): 275–285.
Marshall, P.H., Atkinson, D.J., Ee, L. and McKay, J. (1993) Computer-aided problem solving: an overview of successful methodologies. The Environmental Professional, 15(2): 159–163.
McKay, J. (1994) The application of soft management science/operational research to information systems requirements analysis: a study using cognitive mapping and the SODA methodology. Candidacy Research Proposal for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia
McKay, J. and Marshall, P. (1993) The implications of new developments in management science for information systems planing and development. School of Information Systems Working Paper Series 93.02, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology.
McKay, J., Marshall, P. and McDermid, D. (1994a) Cognitive mapping for information requirements determination in the learning organisation. In Baets, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Information Systems, University of Nijenrode, Netherlands: 759–770.
McKay, J., Marshall, P.H. and McDermid, D.C. (1994b) Meeting the challenge of information requirements determination in the learning organisation. In P. Kerola, A. Juustila and J. Jarvinen (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th IRIS, University of Oulu, Finland, August 1994.
McKay, J. (1996) The application of soft management science/operational research to information systems requirements analysis: a study using cognitive mapping and the SODA methodology. Unpublished PhD thesis (in progress), Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.
Nosek, J.T. and Sherr, D.M. (1984) “Getting the requirements right ” vs. “Getting the system working”-Evolutionary development. In Bemelmans, T. (ed.) Beyond Productivity: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness. North Holland, Amsterdam.
Phillips, L. (1984) A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56: 29–48.
Shah, H.U., Dingley, S. and Golder, P.A. (1994) Bridging the culture gap between users and developers. Journal of Systems Management, 45 (July): 18–21.
Shand, R.M. (1994) User manuals as project management tools: part I-theoretical background. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37(2): 75–80.
Siddiqi, J. and Shekaran, M.C. (1996) Requirements engineering: the emerging wisdom. IEEE Software, 13(2): 15–19.
Tan, M. (1993) Using communication theory for systems design: a model for eliciting information requirements. In D. Avison, J.E. Kendall, and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Human, Organizational and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development (A-24): 241–262. Elsevier Science, North Holland.
Vogel, D. and George, J.F. (1992) Group support for analysis and design. Informatica, 1(1).
Wilson, B. (1989) A systems methodology for information requirements analysis. In Klein, H. and Kumar, K. (eds.) Systems Development for Human Progress. Elsevier Science, North Holland.
Weill, P. and Olson, M.H. (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly, 13(1): 3–17.
Weinberg, (1982) Understanding the professional programmer. Little Brown, Toronto, Canada.
Wood-Harper, A.T., Antill, L. and Avison, D.E. (1985,) Information systems definition: the Multiview approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKay, J., Marshall, P., McDermid, D. (1997). How Shared is Shared Understanding in Information Requirements Determination?. In: Wojtkowski, W.G., Wojtkowski, W., Wrycza, S., Zupančič, J. (eds) Systems Development Methods for the Next Century. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5915-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7712-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5915-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive