Skip to main content

Medicolegal Psychopharmacology

  • Chapter
  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

Clinicians in all fields of medicine, including psychiatry, have become acutely conscious of the problems posed by the threat of liability. In psychopharmacology, courts and attorneys are able to understand and see some of the concrete actions of the pharmacological agents, in contrast to the relatively cloudy effects of psychotherapy, thus increasing the likelihood of litigation. In this context, clinicians must understand the medicolegal issues that surround, limit, and influence their practice of psychopharmacology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelbaum P. S., Gutheil T. G.: Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law, 2nd ed. Baltimore,Williams and Wilkins, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gutheil T. G., Bursztajn H., Brodsky A.: Malpractice prevention through the sharing of uncertainty: Informed consent and the therapeutic alliance. N Engl J Med 311: 49–51, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutheil T. G.: The psychology of psychopharmacology. Bull Menninger Clin 46: 321–330, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutheil T. G.: The right to refuse treatment: Paradox, pendulum and quality of care. Behav Sci Law 4: 265–277, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. For example, see Stensvad v. Reivitz (D.C. Wisc. 84-C-383-5, Jan. 10, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Youngberg v. Romeo 50 U.S.L.W. 4681 (June 15, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For example, Rivers v. Katz 495 N.E.2d 337 (N.Y., 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoge S. K., Gutheil T. G., Kaplan E.: The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: Preliminary empirical findings and comparisons. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 15: 163–169, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Appelbaum P. S., Gutheil T. G.: The right to refuse treatment: The real issue is quality of care. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 9: 199–202, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Appelbaum P. S., Gutheil T. G.: Clinical aspects of treatment refusal. Compr Psychiatry 23: 560–566, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gutheil, T.G. (1998). Medicolegal Psychopharmacology. In: Gelenberg, A.J., Bassuk, E.L. (eds) The Practitioner’s Guide to Psychoactive Drugs. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5877-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5877-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7695-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5877-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics