Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper introduces the ‘maximum material part’ (MMP) in higher dimensions, extending the 1-D MMP introduced in [9]. Given a toleranced object, an MMP is an ‘in-tolerance’ part that contains (as in set containment) all other in-tolerance parts, under suitable rigid motions. We show how tolerances leading to MMPs may be defined and how these lead to elegant solutions for the analysis of ‘floating’ assemblies of rigid toleranced objects. MMPs are also useful in motion planning with toleranced objects.

We examine links between MMPs and geometric tolerancing, and propose extensions to tolerancing standards that would facilitate the definition of MMPs. We suggest future research that might extend our approach to broader classes of tolerance and assembly specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1995, Dimensioning and Tolerancing (ASME Y14.5M-1994), ASME, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1995, Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles (ASME Y14.5.1M-1994), ASME, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer, M., Stewart, N. F., 1991, “Modeling spaces for toleranced objects,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 10, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer, M., Stewart, N. F., 1992, “Imperfect form tolerancing on manifold objects: a metric approach,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 11, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman, C. M., 1989, Geometric and Solid Modeling: An Introduction, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraman, R., Srinivasan, V., 1989, “Geometric tolerancing: I. Virtual boundary requirements,” IBM J. of Research and Development, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 90–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Joskowicz, L., Sacks, E., Srinivasan, V., 1997, “Kinematic Tolerance Analysis,” Computer Aided Design, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lozano-Perez, T., 1983, “Spatial planning: a configuration space approach”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-32, no. 2, pp. 108–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Parratt, S. W., May 1994, “A theory of one-dimensional tolerancing for assembly,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Requicha, A. A. G., 1977, “Part and assembly description languages I: Dimensioning and tolerancing,” TM-19, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Requicha, A. A. G., 1977, “Mathematical models of rigid solid objects,” TM-28, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Requicha, A. A. G., Tilove, R. B., 1978, “Mathematical foundations of constructive solid geometry,” TM-27a, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Requicha, A. A. G., 1980, “Representations for rigid solids: theory, methods, and systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Requicha, A. A. G., 1983, “Toward a theory of geometric tolerancing,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Requicha, A. A. G., 1984, “Representations of tolerances in solid modeling: issues and alternative approaches,” in Solid Modeling by Computers, Pickett, M. S., and Boyse, J. W., eds., Plenum Publishing, New York, NY, pp. 3–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Requicha, A. A. G., Whalen, T. W., 1992 “Representations for assemblies,” Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems report #267, Univ. of S. Calif., Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, D. M., 1997 (expected), “Geometric Tolerancing for Assembly,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rossignac, J. R., 1985, “Blending and offsetting solid models,” TM-54, Production Automation Project, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Srinivasan V., Jayaraman, R., 1989, “Geometric tolerancing: II. Conditional tolerances,” IBM J. of Research and Development, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 105–124.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, D.M. (1998). Geometric Tolerancing for Assembly with Maximum Material Parts. In: ElMaraghy, H.A. (eds) Geometric Design Tolerancing: Theories, Standards and Applications. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5797-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5797-5_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7656-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5797-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics