Advertisement

Conformal Radiation Therapy — A Physician’s Perspective

  • Srinivasan Vijayakumar
  • Leon Myrianthopoulos
  • Russell Hamilton
  • George Chen
Part of the Cancer Treatment and Research book series (CTAR, volume 93)

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a predominantly local-regional modality in the treatment of cancer. The similarities between the roles of surgery and RT in oncology are many, with some very important differences. Surgery, like RT, is also a local-regional modality; the extent of surgery and RT are often limited by the potential morbidities they can induce in the surrounding organs or tissues, or the tissues of origin of the cancer. Technique and the individual physician’s experience are very important to both. As technical advances occur, both modalities have helped improve the outcome and decrease the morbidities associated with treatments; a knowledge of anatomy is very important in the practice of both disciplines. There are also some differences: Whereas surgery cannot eradicate unrecognized microscopic or subclinical disease in the surrounding tissues or at the tumor margins, RT can. The organ- and function-preservation potentials of RT are becoming more obvious in recent years. Also becoming apparent are the benefits of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments in their improved local-regional control in many sites compared with RT alone.

Keywords

Clinical Target Volume Normal Tissue Complication Probability Compute Tomo Tumor Control Probability Systemic Disease Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lichter AS. 1991. Three-dimensional conformai radiation therapy: A testable hypothesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:853–855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leibel SA, Ling CC, Kutcher GJ, Mohan R, Cordon-Cordo C, Fuks Z. 1991. The biological basis for conformai three-dimensional radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:805–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vijayakumar S, Chen GTY. 1995. Implementation of three-dimensional conformai radiation therapy: Prospects and opportunities, and challenges. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:979–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vijayakumar S, Chen GTY, Low N, Myrianthopoulos LC, Chiru P, Rosenberg I. 1992. Beam’s eye view-based radiation therapy: Descriptions of methods. RadioGraphics 12: 961–968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall EJ, Cox JD. 1989. Preface. In Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Radiation Therapy in the 1990s: Rationale for the Emerging Modalities. Radiological Society of North America.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vijayakumar S, Low N, Chen GTY, Myrianthopoulos LC, Culbert, H, Chiru P, Spelbring D, Awan A, Rosenberg I, Halpern H, Weichselbaum RR. 1991. Beams eye view based photon radiotherapy I. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1575–1586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    1983. Proceedings of the Workshop on Patterns of Failure after Cancer Treatment. Cancer Treatment Symposia 2, NIH Publication No. 83-2488, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moss WT. 1989. Principles of combining radiation therapy and surgery. In Moss WT, Cox JD, eds. Radiation Oncology: Rationale, Technique, Results, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby, pp. 58–67.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suit, HD. 1988. The scope of the problem of primary tumor control. Cancer 61:2141–2147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suit HD, Becht J, Loeng J, Stracher M, Wood W, Verhey L, Goitein M. 1988. Potential for improvement in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:777–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suit HD, Westgate SJ. 1985. Impact of improved local control on survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12:453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox JD. 1983. Failure analysis in diagnostic and treatment strategies in cancer management. Cancer Treat Symp 2:1–4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuks Z, Leibel SA, Kutcher GJ, Mohan R, Ling CC. 1991. Three dimensional conformai treatment: A new frontier in radiation therapy. In DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Important Advances in Oncology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuks L, Leibel SA, Wallner KE, Begg CB, Fair WR, Anderson LL, Hilaris BS, Whitmore WF. 1991. The effect of local control on metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the prostate: Long term results in patients treated with I implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:537–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leibel SA, Scott CB, Mohiuddin M, Marcial VA, Coia LR, Davis LW, Fuks Z. 1991. The effect of local-regional control on distant metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of an analysis from the RTOG head and neck database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:805–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sheldon PW, Begg AC, Fowler JF, Lansley IF. 1974. The incidence of lung metastases in C3H mice after treatment of implanted tumors with X-rays or surgery. Br J Cancer 30:342–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramsay J, Suit HD, Sedlacek R. 1983. Experimental studies on the incidence of metastases after failure of radiation treamtent and the effect of salvage surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:1165–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peters LJ. 1975. A study of the influence of various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures applied to a murine squamous carcinoma and its metastatic behaviour. Br J Cancer 32:355–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deacon J, Peckham MJ, Steele GG. 1984. The radioresponsiveness in human tumors and the initial slope of the cell survival curve. Radiother Oncol 2:317–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fertil B, Malaise EP. 1981. Inherent cellular ra-diosensitivity is a basic concept for human tumor radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7:621–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fertil B, Malaise EP. 1985. Intrinsic radiosensitivity of human cell lines is correlated with radioresponsiveness of human tumors. Analysis of 101 published survival curves. Int J Radit Oncol Biol Phys 11:1699–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vijayakumar S, Ng TC, Raudkivi U, Meaney TJ. 1990. Mean inactivation dose (D): A critical analysis of a neglected parameter in radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 29:65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peters LL, Hopwood LE, Withers HR, Suit HD. 1984. Predictive assays of tumor radiocurability. Cancer Treat Symp 1:67–74.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peters LJ, Withers HR, Thames HD, Fletcher GH. 1982. The problem: Tumor radioresistance in clinical radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8:101–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kline RW, Foley WD, Gillin MT. 1985. Computed tomography and radiation therapy treatment planning. In Bragg DG, Rubin P, Youker JE, eds. Oncologic Imaging. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 573–585.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myrianthopoulos LC, Chen GTY, Vijayakumar S, Halpern H, Spelbring DR, Pelizzari CA. 1992. Beam’s eye view volumetrics: An aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:367–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fox PT, Perlumtter JS, Raichle ME. 1985. A stereotactic method of anatomical localization for positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:141–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bergstrom M, et al. 1981. Head fixation device for reproducible position alignment in transmission CT and positron emission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:136–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schad LR, Boesecke R, Schlegel W, et al. 1987. Three-dimensional image correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:948–954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gamboa-Aldeco A, Fellingham LL, Chen, GTY. 1986. Correlation of 3D surfaces from multiple modalities in medical imaging. In S.P.I.E. Proceedings, 626, Newport Beach, CA, February, 1986, pp. 460–466.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maguire GQ, Noz ME, Lee EM, Schimpf JH. 1985. Correlation methods for tomographic images using two and three dimensional techniques. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 266–279.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY, Spelbring DR, Weichselbaum RR, Chen C-T. 1989. Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET, and/ or MR images of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:20–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Purdy JA, Harms WB, Michalski J, Cox JD. 1996. Multi-institutional clinical trials: 3-D conformai radiotherapy quality assurance. Guidelones in an NCI/RTOG study evaluating dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Fronti Radiat Ther Oncol 29:255–263.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hanks GE. 1993. Conformai radiation in prostate cancer: Reduced morbidity with hope of increased local control [editorial; comment]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25:377–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Graham MV. 1994. Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning study for patient with carcinoma of the lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29:1105–1117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sandler HM. 1996. 3-D conformai radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The University of Michigan experience. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 29:238–243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Forman JD, Orton C, Ezzell G, Porter AT. 1993. Preliminary results of a hyperfractionated dose escalation study for locally advanced adenocar-cinoma of the prostate. Radiother Oncol 27: 203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinivasan Vijayakumar
  • Leon Myrianthopoulos
  • Russell Hamilton
  • George Chen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations