Skip to main content

Abstract

The limits of attention, which must be allocated among a given number of alternative uses, have been recognized by many economists. For example, a manager may want to allocate his or her attention between a number of projects or other sources of information. Or a manager may want to allocate employees’ attention among different tasks. However, in these models of allocating attention, the number of alternative uses to which attention may be allocated is exogenously given. When applied to the problems of innovation and product improvement, limited entrepreneurial attention is allocated between improving the declining profitability of current operations and increasing the number of current operations. The allocation of entrepreneurial attention endogenizes the number of current operations and the opportunity costs of attention. The optimal allocation of entrepreneurial attention thus determines the size of the firm, its rate of growth and the firm’s level of innovative activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow K.J., 1974, The Limits of Organization, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.I., 1938, The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., 1990, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive, Journal of Political Economy 98, 893–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S., 1965, A Theory of the Allocation of Time, Economic Journal 75, 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., 1985, Mechanistic and Organismic Structures, in D. S. Pugh, ed. Organization Theory, Viking Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M., 1968, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D., 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H., 1937, The Nature of the Firm, Economica 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J. R., 1934, Institutional Economics, Macmillan Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988, Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S. and Leighton, L. S., 1990, Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.) The Economics of Small Firms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J. and Milgrom, P., 1991, A Theory of Hierarchies Based on Limited Managerial Attention, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 5, 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S., 1989, The Allocation of Entrepreneurial Attention: Firm Size, Growth and Innovation, doctoral dissertation, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S., 1997, A Model of Optimal Inspection and Repair of an Endogenous Number of Projects with Imperfect Observations, Working paper, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S., 1992, Innovation, Firm Size and Growth, Rand Journal of Economics 23, 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S. and Wilson, C.A., 1995, A Model of Project Evaluation With Limited Attention, Economic Theory 5, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. von, 1945, The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., 1984, On the Theory of Delegation, in M. Boyer and R. Kihlstrom (eds.) Bayesian Models of Economic Theory, Noth-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P., 1991, Multi-Task Principal-agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N., 1934, The Equilibrium of the Firm, Economic Journal 44,60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M., 1983, The Change Masters, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. 1979, Perception, Opportunity and Profit, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Simon, H. A., 1958, Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, T.A., 1959, Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Organizations, Econometrica 27, 399–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, T.A. and Radner, R., 1972, Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., 1988, Employment Contracts, Influence Activities, and Efficient Organization Design, Journal of Political Economy 96, 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W.Y., 1983, Heterogeneous Firms and the Organization of Production, Economic Inquiry 21, 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R., 1975, A Behavioral Model of Cost Reduction, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 6, 196–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. and Rothschild, M., 1975, On the Allocation of Effort, Journal of Economic Theory 10, 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., 1975, Further Notes on the Allocation of Effort, in Richard H. Day and Theodore Groves eds. Adaptive Ecomonic Models, Academic Press, New York, 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. E., 1976, Administrative Behavior, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., 1976, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanZandt, T., 1990, Information Overload in a Network of Targeted Communication, unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zandt, T, 1995, Continuous Approximations in the Study of Hierarchies, The RAND Journal of Economics 26, 575-.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G., 1981, Attention Allocation and Input Proportions, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations 2, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G., 1985, The Case For ‘Mechanistic’ Decision Making, in Johannes M. Pennings and Associates ed. Organizational Strategy and Change, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gifford, S. (1998). Limited Attention. In: The Allocation of Limited Entrepreneurial Attention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5605-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5605-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7564-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5605-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics