Abstract
The limits of attention, which must be allocated among a given number of alternative uses, have been recognized by many economists. For example, a manager may want to allocate his or her attention between a number of projects or other sources of information. Or a manager may want to allocate employees’ attention among different tasks. However, in these models of allocating attention, the number of alternative uses to which attention may be allocated is exogenously given. When applied to the problems of innovation and product improvement, limited entrepreneurial attention is allocated between improving the declining profitability of current operations and increasing the number of current operations. The allocation of entrepreneurial attention endogenizes the number of current operations and the opportunity costs of attention. The optimal allocation of entrepreneurial attention thus determines the size of the firm, its rate of growth and the firm’s level of innovative activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow K.J., 1974, The Limits of Organization, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
Barnard, C.I., 1938, The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Baumol, W.J., 1990, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive, Journal of Political Economy 98, 893–919.
Becker, G.S., 1965, A Theory of the Allocation of Time, Economic Journal 75, 493–517.
Burns, T., 1985, Mechanistic and Organismic Structures, in D. S. Pugh, ed. Organization Theory, Viking Press, New York.
Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M., 1968, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.
Chandler, A.D., 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Coase, R.H., 1937, The Nature of the Firm, Economica 4, 386–405.
Commons, J. R., 1934, Institutional Economics, Macmillan Company, New York.
Dosi, G., 1988, Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120–1171.
Evans, D.S. and Leighton, L. S., 1990, Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.) The Economics of Small Firms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Geanakoplos, J. and Milgrom, P., 1991, A Theory of Hierarchies Based on Limited Managerial Attention, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 5, 205.
Gifford, S., 1989, The Allocation of Entrepreneurial Attention: Firm Size, Growth and Innovation, doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Gifford, S., 1997, A Model of Optimal Inspection and Repair of an Endogenous Number of Projects with Imperfect Observations, Working paper, Rutgers University.
Gifford, S., 1992, Innovation, Firm Size and Growth, Rand Journal of Economics 23, 284–298.
Gifford, S. and Wilson, C.A., 1995, A Model of Project Evaluation With Limited Attention, Economic Theory 5, 67–78.
Hayek, F. von, 1945, The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Review 35, 519–530.
Holmstrom, B., 1984, On the Theory of Delegation, in M. Boyer and R. Kihlstrom (eds.) Bayesian Models of Economic Theory, Noth-Holland, Amsterdam.
Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P., 1991, Multi-Task Principal-agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7, 24.
Kaldor, N., 1934, The Equilibrium of the Firm, Economic Journal 44,60–76.
Kanter, R.M., 1983, The Change Masters, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Kirzner, I.M. 1979, Perception, Opportunity and Profit, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
March, J.G. and Simon, H. A., 1958, Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Marschak, T.A., 1959, Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Organizations, Econometrica 27, 399–430.
Marschak, T.A. and Radner, R., 1972, Economic Theory of Teams, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Milgrom, P., 1988, Employment Contracts, Influence Activities, and Efficient Organization Design, Journal of Political Economy 96, 42–60.
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Oi, W.Y., 1983, Heterogeneous Firms and the Organization of Production, Economic Inquiry 21, 147–171.
Radner, R., 1975, A Behavioral Model of Cost Reduction, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 6, 196–215.
Radner, R. and Rothschild, M., 1975, On the Allocation of Effort, Journal of Economic Theory 10, 358–376.
Rothschild, M., 1975, Further Notes on the Allocation of Effort, in Richard H. Day and Theodore Groves eds. Adaptive Ecomonic Models, Academic Press, New York, 195–220.
Simon, H. E., 1976, Administrative Behavior, The Free Press, New York.
Smith, A., 1976, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
VanZandt, T., 1990, Information Overload in a Network of Targeted Communication, unpublished manuscript.
Van Zandt, T, 1995, Continuous Approximations in the Study of Hierarchies, The RAND Journal of Economics 26, 575-.
Winter, S.G., 1981, Attention Allocation and Input Proportions, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations 2, 31–46.
Winter, S.G., 1985, The Case For ‘Mechanistic’ Decision Making, in Johannes M. Pennings and Associates ed. Organizational Strategy and Change, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 99–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gifford, S. (1998). Limited Attention. In: The Allocation of Limited Entrepreneurial Attention. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5605-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5605-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7564-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5605-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive