Skip to main content

Depression Cartels, Market Structure, and Performance

  • Chapter
Competition, Efficiency, and Welfare
  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

Competition policy in industrial economies typically combines a general policy of independent action by independent firms with a menu of exceptions. The entries on the menu of exceptions differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Many systems allow independent firms to cooperate on basic research and development; some allow cooperation in production, under certain conditions; other do not. In this chapter I discuss depression cartels, which have a history of inclusion in the list of exceptions to the general rule of independent actions by independent firms. I distinguish between depression cartels and rationalization cartels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • EC Commission (1982): Twelfth Report on Competition Policy, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Trade Commission (1997): Outline of the Omnibus Act to Repeal and Reform Cartels and other Systems exempted from the Application of the Antimonopoly Act under Various Laws, FTC/Japan Views 29, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, E.W. (1966): The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heusdens, J.J. and DE Horn, R. (1980): Crisis in the European Steel industry in the Light of the ECSC Treaty, Common Market Law Review 17, 31–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Ch.A. (1995): Industrial Organization: A Survey of Laboratory Research, in Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (eds.): The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyori, H. and Uesugi, A (1983): The Antimonopoly Laws of Japan, Federal Legal Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joliet, R. (1981): Caltelisation, Dirigism and Crisis in the European Community, World Economy 3, 403–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1996): R&D Joint Ventures and Tacit Product Market Collusion, European Journal of Political Economy 11, 733–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, A.M. Jr. (1959): The Coming of the New Deal, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, S. (1999). Depression Cartels, Market Structure, and Performance. In: Mueller, D.C., Haid, A., Weigand, J. (eds) Competition, Efficiency, and Welfare. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5559-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5559-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7542-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5559-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics