Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Electronic Testing ((FRET,volume 13))

Abstract

Recent attention to using “case-based” reasoning for intelligent fault diagnosis has led to the development of very large, complex databases of diagnostic cases. The performance of case-based reasoners is dependent upon the size of the case base such that as case bases increase in size, it is usually reasonable to expect accuracy to improve but computational performance to degrade. Given one of these large case bases, it is advantageous to attempt to induce structure from the case base whereby the diagnostic process can be made more efficient. In addition, certainty properties of case based reasoning make fault diagnosis difficult, in which case inducing structure and applying a method for reasoning under uncertainty becomes advantageous. In this chapter, we discuss an approach to analyzing a diagnostic case base and inducing a compact knowledge base using the diagnostic inference model with which efficient diagnostics can be performed. We then apply an approach to reasoning using Dempster-Shafer theory to improve the diagnostics further with the resultant model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aamodt, A. and E. Plaza. 1994. “Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches,” AI Communications, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovici, M., M. A. Breuer, and A. D. Friedman. 1990. Digital Systems Testing and Testable Design, New York: Computer Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cover, T. M., and P. E. Hart. 1967. “Nearest Neighbor Classification,” IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, Vol. IT-13, pp. 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasarathy, B. V. (ed.). 1991. Nearest-Neighbor Norms: NN Pattern Classification Techniques, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaney, W. H. and C. R. Unkle. 1995. “Using Dependency Analysis to Predict Fault Dictionary Effectiveness,” AUTOTESTCON ‘95 Conference Record, New York: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denceux, T. 1995. “A k-Nearest Neighbor Classification Rule Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-25, No. 5, pp. 804–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devijver, P. A. and J. Kittler. 1982. Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P.. 1968. “A Generalization of Bayesian Inference,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, pp. 205–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, F. 1986. “Noninvasive Diagnostic Technique Attacks MIL-SPEC Problems,” Electronics Test, Miller-Freeman Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliger, S., S. Yemini, Y. Yemini, D. Ohsie, and S. Stolfo. 1995. “A Coding Approach to Event Correlation,” Fourth International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, Santa Barbara, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. 1989. “An Empirical Comparison of Pruning Methods for Decision Tree Induction,” Machine Learning Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, R. 1986. “Induction of Decision Trees,” Machine Learning, Vol. l,pp. 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, J. and K. R. Bowden. 1985. “The Modern Fault Dictionary,” Proceedings of the International Test Conference” Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. 1994. Compressed and Dynamic Fault Dictionaries for Fault Isolation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. W. 1996. “Maintaining Diagnostic Truth with Information Flow Models,” AUTOTESTCON ‘96 Conference Record, New York: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. W. and W. R. Simpson. 1991. “A Mathematical Model for Integrated Diagnostics,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, Vol. 8, No. 4, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. W. and W. R. Simpson. 1998. “Managing Conflict in System Diagnosis,” System Test and Diagnosis: Research Perspectives and Case Studies, eds. J. W. Sheppard and W. R. Simpson, Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shortliffe, E. H. 1976. Computer Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN, Elseview, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. R. and J. W. Sheppard. 1994. System Test and Diagnosis, Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfill, C. and D. Waltz. 1986. “Toward Memory-Based Reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 1213–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomek, I. 1976. “An Experiment with the Edited Nearest Neighbor Rule.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-6, No. 6, pp. 448–452.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloss, R. E. 1978. “Size Optimization in Fault Dictionaries,” Proceedings of the Semiconductor Test Conference, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloss, R. E. 1980.:Fault Dictionary Compression: Recognizing when a Fault may be Unambiguously Represented by a Single Failure Detection,” Proceedings of the International Test Conference, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 368–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson., D 1972. “Asymptotic Properties of Nearest Neighbor Rules Using Edited Data,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-2, No. 3, pp. 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheppard, J.W. (1998). Inducing Diagnostic Inference Models from Case Data. In: Research Perspectives and Case Studies in System Test and Diagnosis. Frontiers in Electronic Testing, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5545-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5545-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7535-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5545-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics