Abstract
Why is anyone interested in control at the atomic level? One obvious answer is that control at the atomic level enables control at larger scales. Some examples of this are clear enough; nano-engineering is precisely about this. However, in many cases the question of how control at the atomic level results in control at other length scales is far from clear. This is particularly the case in complex materials where many mechanisms are active at once. Putting reactive elements into an alloy to control the growth of the resulting scale is an attempt to control atomistic processes, but the details of how it works are often obscure. Yet control implies that we can identify what the important mechanisms are and then find a procedure that will enhance (or inhibit) the mechanism we want to affect without causing problems elsewhere. The traditional way of controlling complex systems is trial and error. The equally traditional difficulty is the large error to trial ratio. In the hope of reducing this a bit, people have turned to modelling complex processes. However, unless we are in the (unusual) position of being able to model everything the problem of deciding what the important mechanisms are remains. The strategy of mesoscopic modelling is to attempt to identify the individual mechanisms and model these at the appropriate length scale (which will often be atomistic but need not be) and then to build a model of how these mechanisms interact to produce the process. If the result of a process is a material, a final goal will often be to predict the properties of the material as a function of the conditions under which it was made. ‘Properties’ may be of two main kinds. First, we may require the effective bulk properties (elastic constants, thermal conductivity). These depend on the averaged behaviour of the microstructure but are unlikely to be dependent on individual features of the microstructure. Other properties such as the probability of fracture may well depend on such features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. E. King, G. Campbell, T. Gonis, G. Henshall, D. Lesuer, E. Zywicz, and S. Foiles, Theory, simulation, and modeling of interfaces in materials-bridging the length-scale gap: a workshop report, Mater. Sci. Eng., A191:1 (1995).
G. Binnig, C. F. Quate and C. Gerber, Atomic force microscope Phys. Rev. Lett.,-56:930(1986).
F. Ohnesorge and G. Binnig, True atomic resolution by atomic force microscopy through atomic and repulsive forces, Science, 260:1451 (1993).
A. Shluger, C. Pisani, C. Roetti and R. Orlando, Ab initio simulation of the interaction between ionic crystal surfaces and the atomic force microscope tip, J. Vac. Sci., A8:3967 (1990).
A. L. Shluger, A. L. Rohl, D. H. Gay, and R. T. Williams, Atomistic theory of the interaction between AFM tips and ionic surfaces, J. Phys. Cond. Mater., 6:1825 (1994).
A. L. Shluger, R. M. Wilson and R. T. Williams, Theoretical and experimental investigation of force imaging at the atomic scale on alkali halide crystals, Phys. Rev., B49:4915 (1994).
A. L. Shluger, A. L. Rohl, R. T. Williams and R. M. Wilson, Model of a scanning force microscope on ionic surfaces, Phys. Rev., B52:11398 (1995).
A. L. Shluger, R. T. Williams and A. L. Rohl, Lateral and friction forces originating during force force microscopy scanning of ionic surfaces; Surf Sct., 343:273 (1996).
S. C. Jain, T. J. Gosling, J. R. Willis, R. Bullough, and P. Balk, A new study of critical layer thickness, stability and strain relaxation in pseudomorphic GexSi1‐x strained epilayers, Phil. Mag., A65:1151 (1992).
S. C. Jain, M. Willander and H. Maes, Stresses and strains in epilayers, stripes and quantum structures of III-V compound semiconductors, Semicond. Sci. Tech., 11:461 (1996).
S. C. Jain, A. H. Harker and R. A. Cowley, Misfit strains and misfit dislocations in lattice-mismatched epitaxial layers and other systems, Adv. in Phys. in press.
A. H. Harker, K. Pinardi, S. C. Jain, A. Atkinson and R. Bullough, Two-dimensional finite-element calculation of stress and strain in a stripe epilayer and substrate, Phil, Mag., A71:871 (1995).
S. C. Jain, A. H. Harker, A. Atkinson and K. Pinardi, Edge induced stress and strain in stripe films and substrates: A 2D finite element calculation, J. Appl. Phys., 78:1630(1995).
S. C. Jain, B. Dietrich, H. Richter, A. Atkinson and A. H. Harker, Stresses in strained GeSi stripes: Calculation and determination from Raman measurements, Phys. Rev. B52:6247 (1995).
J. H. Harding, Computer simulation of defects in ionic solids; Rep. Prog. Phys., 53:1403(1990).
I. Dawson, P. D. Bristowe, M-H Lee, M. C. Payne, M. D. Segall and J. A. White. A first principles study of a tilt grain boundary in rutile, J. Phys. Cond. Mater. in press.
T. X. T. Sayle, C. R. A. Catlow, D. C. Sayle, S. C. Parker and J. H. Harding, Computer simulation of thin film heteroepitaxial ceramic interfaces using a near-coincidence-site lattice theory, Phil. Mag., A68:565 (1993).
D.C. Sayle, S. C. Parker and J. H. Harding, Accommodation of the misfit strain energy in the BaO(100)/MgO(100) heteroepitaxial ceramic interface using computer simulation techniques, J. Mater. Sci., 4:1883 (1994).
P. W. Tasker, The surface energy, surface tensions and surface structure of the alkali halide crystals, Phil. Mag., A39:119 (1979).
H. Grimmer, W. Bollman, and D. H. Warrington, Coincidence site lattices and complete pattern shift lattices in cubic crystals, Acta Cryst. 30:197 (1974).
H. Mykura, P. S. Bansal and M. H. Lewis, Coincidence-site-lattice relations for MgO-CdO interfaces, Phil. Mag., A42:225 (1980).
D. G. Brandon, B. Ralph, S. Ranganathan and M. S. Wald, A field ion microscope study of atomic configuration at grain boundaries, Acta Metall., 12:813 (1964).
A. H. King and A. Singh, Generalising the coincidence site lattice model to non-cubic systems, J. Phys. Chem. Solids., 55:1023 (1994).
D. M. Duffy, Grain boundaries in ionic crystals, J. Phys., C19:4393 (1986).
D. C. Sayle, T. X. T. Sayle, S. C. Parker, C. R. A. Catlow and J. H. Harding, The effect of defects on the stability of heteroepitaxial ceramic interfaces as studied by computer simulation, Phys. Rev., B50:14498 (1994).
D. C. Sayle, T. X. T. Sayle, S. C. Parker, J. H. Harding and C. R. A. Catlow, The stability of defects in the ceramic interfaces MgO/MgO and CeO2AI2O3/ Surf. Sct., 334:170(1994).
G. W. Watson, E. T. Kelsey, N. H. de Leeuw, D. J. Harris and S. C. Parker, Atomistic simulation of dislocations, surfaces and interfaces in MgO, J. Phys. Cond. Mater., in press.
J. A. Venables, Atomic processes in crystal growth, Surf: Sci., 299/300:798 (1994).
R. A. McKee, F. J. Walker, E. D. Specht, G. E. Jellison, L. A. Boatner and J. H. Harding, Interface stability and the growth of optical quality perovskites on MgO, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:2741 (1994).
A L. Shluger, A. L. Rohl and D. H. Gay, Properties of small clusters at ionic surfaces: (NaCl)n clusters (n=1–48) at the (100)MgO surface, Phys. Rev., B51:13631 (1995).
J. Tersoff, A. W. D. van der Gon. and R. M. Tromp, Critical ion size for layer-by-layer growth Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:266 (1994).
J. Tersoff, C. Tiechert and M. G. Lagally, Self organisation in quamum dot superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:1675 (1996).
Q. Xie, A. Madhukar, P. Chen and N. P. Kobayashi, Vertically self-organised InAs quantum box islands on GaAs (100), Phys. Rev. Lett., 47:1459 (1981).
K. Batchelor, Transport properties of two-phase materials with random structure, Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech., 6:227 (1974)
M. Ferrari, Composite homogenisation via the equivalent poly-inclusion approach, Comp. Eng., 4:37 (1994).
J. H. Harding and A. H. Harker, Effective medium theories for cracked and porous media, unpublished work.
W. L. Bragg, and A. B. Pippard, The form birefringence of macromolecules, Acta Cryst., 6:865. (1953).
M. Bertagnolli, M. Marchese, G. Jacucci, I. St Doltsinis and S. Nolting, Finite element thermo-mechanical simulation of droplets impacting on a rigid substrate, Materials and Design Technology (ed TJ Kozik) 62:199, ASME (1994).
P. Fauchais A. Grimaud, A. Vardelle, and M. Vardelle, La projection par plasma: une revue; Ann. Phys. Fr., 14:261 (1989)
S. Cirolini, M. Marchese, G. Jacucci, J. H. Harding, and P. A. Mulheran, Modelling the microstructure of thermal barrier coatings, Materials and Design Technology (ed TJ Kozik) 62:189 ASME (1994).
M. Schutze, An approach to a global model of the mechanical behaviour of oxide scales, Mater, at High Temp., 12:237 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, J.H., Harker, A.H., Shluger, A.L., Stoneham, A.M. (1998). Making the Connection Between Atomistic Modelling of Interfaces and Real Materials. In: Tomsia, A.P., Glaeser, A.M. (eds) Ceramic Microstructures. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5393-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5393-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7462-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5393-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive