Skip to main content

Abstract

Lead is ubiquitous on the earth’s crust, it is found at low concentration in most soils. Anthropogenic activities, such as mining and processing have steadily increased the level of lead in the environment. Lead has been used by man for various purposes, such as ammunition, piping, vessels, batteries, and as an anti-knocking agent in gasoline engines. It is also a hazardous constituent that has been known to cause abnormalities in the nervous system, the reproductive system and the gastro-intestinal system. Because of its solubility and sorption properties, lead tends to accumulate more in the colloidal fractions of the soil than in water.

The Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) firing ranges are usually located indoors, often without adequate ventilation to purge out the lead particulate that emanate from shale chambers and bullets. To assess lead contamination from the Army and Navy ROTC ranges at the University of Oklahoma, soil and dust samples were collected using plastic shovels and damp filter papers. Soil samples were sieved using standard ASTM sieve stacks. The extent of contamination was investigated on each soil fraction by assaying the lead content. Lead was measured using an atomic absorption/flame emission unit after digestion with concentrated nit is acid. The amount of lead found in the soil samples indicated strong pollution of the fir-in ranges. Total lead ranged from 295,801 ppm in the most contaminated location to <1 ppm in the least contaminated location. The area of greatest contamination was behind the target line. Sweeping dust samples were collected with damp filter papers from the Army and Navy range floors to measure the lead content. Several soil samples were also taken from 2 inches under the clay liner to track possible mobility of lead through the surface sandy soil. The results of these analyses indicated that lead was primarily associated with the upper portion of the soil. Dust and straw samples from the walls and ceilings showed that particulate lead was present at concentrations high enough to cause adverse effects to health. Four chemicals: EDTA, NTA, HC1, and HNO3, were evaluated as potential soil washing solvents to remove lead from the contaminated soil. Use of 1.0 N HNO3at 1:40 (soil/acid) ratio was found to be the most efficient solution for lead removal. The recovery was 96.5% after 36 h of equilibration with this extraction solution. A 1.0 N NaOH solution was gradually added to the extract in order to determine an optimum pH range for precipitation of lead. Lead precipitated out of the solution at 99.9% in the pH range of 10-10.31.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nriagu, J.O. Lead and Lead Poisoning in Antiquity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Lead, ATSDR, Atlanta, GA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grandjean, P. and E. Bach, “Indirect Exposures: The Significance of Bystanders at Work and at Home,” Journal of American Industrial Hygiene Association, Vol. 47, December 1986, pp. 819–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fiscnbein, A., J. Cohn, and G. Ackerman, “Asbestos, Lead, and the Family: Household Risks,” The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 10, No. 6, June 1980, pp. 989–992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber, G.B., A. Leonard, and P. Jacquet, “Toxicity, Mutagenicity, and Teratogenicity of Lead,” Mutation Research, Vol. 76, 1980, pp. 115–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Needleman, H.L., C. Gunnoe, A. Leviton, R. Reed, H. Peresie, C. Maher, and R. Barret, “Deficits in Psychological and Classroom Performance of Children with Elevated Dentin Lead Levels”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol.300, May 1979, pp. 689–695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Needleman, H.L. and D. Bellinger, “The Health Effects of Low Level Exposure of Lead,” Annual Review of Public Health, 55p., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levallois, P., “Blood Lead Levels in Children and Pregnant Women Living Near a Lead-Reclamation Plant,” J. Canadian Medical Association, 144(7):885–887, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford, R. and Yang, E.C., “Summary of CERCLA Legislation and Regulations and the EPA Superfund Program,” Standard Handbook of Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal, Freedman, H.M, (Editor), New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1989, pp. 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shmidt, W.B., “Assessment of Current Treatment Techniques at Superfund Battery Sites,” Hazardous Waste Treatment: Treatment of Contaminated Soil, Pittsburgh: Air and Waste Management Association, 1990, pp. 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daley, P.S., “Cleaning Up Sites with On-Site Process Plants,” J. Environmental Science and Technology, 23(8):912–916, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hornsby, R.G., “Operating Results from an Integrated Soil and Groundwater Remediation System: Selected for the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program,” AWD Technologic, Inc., Houston, TX, 127p, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Public Law 94–580, “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),” U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Public Law 96–510, “Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA),” U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Public Law 96–616, “Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA),” U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Public Law 94–469, “Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA),” U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Guide For Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA: Soil Washing,” EPA/540/2–91/020A, Washington, D.C., September 1991, pp 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miragaya, J.G., “Levels Chemical Fractionation, and Solubility of Lead in Roadside Soils of Caracas, Venezuela,” Soil Science, I38(2):147–152,1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Basta, N.T. and Tabatabai, M.A., “Effect of Cropping system on Adsorption of Metals by Soils,” Soil Science, 153(2):108–113, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Center for Disease Control, Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. United State Environmental Protection Agency, Air Quality Criteria for LEad, Office of Research and Development, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Science Foundation, Lead in the Environment, Colorado State University, University of Illinois, and University of Missouri, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Snoeyink, V.L. and Jenkins, D., “Coordination Chemistry,” in: Water Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,, New York, 1980, pp. 197–231.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Corrin, M.L. and D.F.S. Natusch, “Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Environmental Lead,” Lead in the Environment, Boggess, W.R. and Wixson, B.G. (Editor), 1979, pp. 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  25. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, “Soil Washing,” Innovative Treatment Technology, EPA/540/5–91/002, Washington, D.C., October 1991e, pp. 4.10–4.25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, R.W., I.O. Ibeabuchi, K.R., Sistani and J.W. Shuford, “Accumulation of Some Metals by Legumes and Their Extractability from Acid Mine Spoils,” J. Environmental Quality, 21:176--180, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maratazavi, S., Konstantin, V., and Choryhanna, G.E., “Treatment of Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metal,” Spectrotech System Inc., Ontario, Canada, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Skoog, D.A. and Waste, D.M, “Complex Formation Titrations,” Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry, New York: CBS College Publishing, 1982, pp 276–300.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sidle, R.C., Chambers, J.C., and M.C. Amacher, “Fate of Heavy Metals in an Abandoned Lead-Zinc Tailing Pond: I1. Sediment,” J. Environmental Quality, 20:752–758, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Chemfix Technology, Inc.: Stabilization/Solidification Process,” EPA/540/A5–89/011, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 1991d, pp. 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atalay, A., Chen, RH., Skierkowski, P. (1997). Extraction of Lead from Soil in ROTC Firing Ranges. In: Tedder, D.W., Pohland, F.G. (eds) Emerging Technologies in Hazardous Waste Management 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5387-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5387-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7459-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5387-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics