Skip to main content

Design Basis for the ITER Plasma Shape and Position Control Reflectometer System

  • Chapter
Book cover Diagnostics for Experimental Thermonuclear Fusion Reactors 2

Abstract

A fundamentally new approach to plasma position control is required on ITER as a consequence of the anticipated long pulse lengths. The error in conventional magnetic plasma position control systems accumulates with time (due to drifts, etc.), such that magnetic systems are not expected to provide accurate control for discharge lengths in excess of ∼1000 s.1 ITER will have pulse lengths exceeding 1000 s, and potentially up to 10,000 s long, such that an alternative plasma position and shape control system will be essential. The concept that edge density profile measurements via reflectometry at multiple poloidal positions could provide a position control capability emerged through the ITER design process, and was briefly discussed at the time of the 1995 Varenna conference on ITER diagnostics.2 In this concept a poloidally distributed set of edge gap measurements (specifically the distance from the first wall (blanket face) to the location of a density layer lying at or inside the separatrix) will be used as an estimator of the plasma boundary shape, and utilized for feedback control. In the two years since 1995 the US Home Team has worked to investigate how this concept would work in practice, as well as to provide detailed design calculations. The conclusion of these studies is that a plasma position control system for ITER based on a poloidal set of edge density profile measurements appears to be viable, with performance levels at or close to requirements. As described in the body of this paper, this conclusion is based on: (1) a proven methodology for the design of profile reflectometer systems, (2) demonstrated performance levels of current reflectometer systems, and (3) specific design and modeling for ITER. Recent descriptions of the use of reflectometer systems for density profile measurements are available,2,3 while a detailed design methodology for optimal system performance has also been developed.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. de Kock et al., Magnetic diagnostics for ITER, in: These Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EJ. Doyle et al., Reflectometry applications to ITER, in: Diagnostics for Experimental Thermonuclear Fusion Reactors, P.E. Stott et al., eds., Plenum Press, New York (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Laviron et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 38, 905 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. V.S. Mukhovatov et al., Role and requirements for plasma measurements on ITER, in: These Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N.L. Bretz et al., ITER position control reflectometry — conceptual design, in: These Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.W. Kim, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1229 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. K.W. Kim, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.W. Kim et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 466 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.W. Swain et al., Nuc. Fusion 37, 211 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. EJ. Doyle, et al., in: Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1992, IAEA, Vienna (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11 A. Silva, et al., in: Fusion Technology, C. Ferro, et al., eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12. E. Mazzucato and R. Nazikian, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1237 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13. G. Conway, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39, 407 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14. G. Vayakis, Fusion Engineering and Design 34-35, 519 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15. P. Varela et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 4937 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doyle, E.J., Bretz, N.L., Kim, K.W., Peebles, W.A., Rhodes, T.L. (1998). Design Basis for the ITER Plasma Shape and Position Control Reflectometer System. In: Stott, P.E., Gorini, G., Prandoni, P., Sindoni, E. (eds) Diagnostics for Experimental Thermonuclear Fusion Reactors 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5353-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5353-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7442-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5353-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics