Skip to main content

Benchmarking: a quest for continuous improvement

  • Chapter
  • 1347 Accesses

Abstract

Any continuous improvement effort requires some aspect dedicated to benchmarking. In the last several years benchmarking has emerged as an integral tool to achieve business objectives. From its beginnings at Xerox, to Ford’s utilization to design the Taurus, the importance of the technique has been recognized and the frequency and scope has increased. In this regard, the International Benchmarking Clearinghouse performed two studies, one in 1992 and the other in 1995. The results illustrate this change in scope and frequency in just the last few years. In 1992, 95% of those surveyed indicated benchmarking was a necessary tool for survival, but they admitted they did not know how to benchmark. By 1995, 60% said they had benchmarked with other organizations and 75% indicated an awareness of the concepts. In 1992, the majority of the firms classified themselves as novices, whereas in 1995 they reported an average of four studies within the previous year and furthermore they had received an average of six requests from other organizations to participate in benchmarking studies. A recent study also shows that an increasing number of quality managers have embraced benchmarking for quality improvement (Chen and Paetsch, 1995). This chapter starts with the background and various types of benchmarking. It progresses to provide the guidelines and process for implementation. Finally, issues in regard to ‘what to benchmark’, ‘with whom’, and ‘lessons learned’ are further elaborated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, P. and VandeWater, R. (1995) ‘Benchmarking the Bottom Line.’ Industrial Engineering, February 1995, pp. 24-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoa Pamphlet (1990) ‘Benchmarking: An Overview of Alcoa’s Benchmarking Process’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altany, D. (1990) ‘Copycats.’ Industry Week, November 5, pp. 11-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altany, D. (1991)’ share and Share Alike.’ Industry Week, July 15, pp. 12-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R.A. and Morey, R.C. (1994) ‘The search for appropriate benchmarking partners: A macro approach and application to corporate travel management.’ Omega, September, pp. 477-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, D.F. (1994)’ strategic benchmarking of service and logistic support operations.’ Journal of Business Logistics, pp. 89-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C.J. (1996) ‘10 Steps to Best-Practices Benchmarking.’ Quality Digest, February, pp. 23-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R. (1989) Benchmarking, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R. (1995) Business Process Benchmarking, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. and Paetsch, K. (1995) ‘Benchmarking: Quality Managers’ Perspective,’ Proceedings of the 26th Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting, Boston, MS, November 20-2, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeToro, I. (1995) The 10 Pitfalls of Benchmarking.’ Quality Progress, January, pp. 61-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J.E. (1993)’ success means doing many things right.’ Production, October, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. (1994) ‘Benchmarking for the purchasing process.’ Purchasing & Supply Management, October, pp. 29-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D.J. (1993) ‘Benchmarking HRD.’ Training & Development, June, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T. (1992) ‘Logistics Benchmarking: Searching for the Best.’ Distribution, March, pp. 30-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, J. (1994) ‘Back to the Basics of Benchmarking.’ Quality, May, pp. 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharbanda, M. and Smith, G. (1993) ‘Benchmarking: making it work.’ CMA-the Management Accounting Magazine, March, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, K.E. ‘Lesson from the Baldrige.’Industry Week, September, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, S. and Price, A. (1996) ‘What Benchmarking Books Don’t Tell You.’ Quality Progress, March, pp. 33-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madu, C. and Kuei, C. (1995) Strategic Total Quality Management, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, L.P. and Ramsey, S. (1994) ‘A benchmark study of the PR News Wire.’ Public Relations Review, Summer, p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (1994) ‘Improving cash flow through benchmarking.’ Healthcare Financial Management, September, pp. 74-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, J. (1994) ‘Total quality and continuous improvement.’Management Services, October, pp. 10-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J., Scherer, R., Westfall, F. and Wilson, JC. (1994) ‘Benchmarking and improving core competencies.’ Journal for Quality & Participation, July-August, pp. 82-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipp, F. (1993) ‘Management Commitment to Quality: Xerox Corp.’Quality Progress, August, pp. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulat, Mustafa B. (1994) ‘Benchmarking is more than organized tourism.’Industrial Engineering, March, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransley, D.L. (1994) ‘Do’s and don’ts of R&D benchmarking.’ Research-Technology Management, September/October, pp. 50-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolstadas, A. (1995) Benchmarking-Theory and Practice, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spendolini, Michael J. (1992) The Benchmarking Book. AMACOM Press, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork, K. (1995) ‘Benchmark Code of Conduct.’ Purchasing, June 15, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. (1993) ‘Quality Benchmark Deployment.’ Quality Progress, December, pp. 81-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.G. and English, J. (1994) ‘A Benchmarking Framework for Quality Improvement.’ Quality Engineering, 6(1), p. 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Instruments Pamphlet (1992) Benchmarking. The Quest for the Best, Texas Instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, F.G. and Zivan, S.M. (1985) ‘A Xerox Cost Center Imitates a Profit Center.’ Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 168-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri, K.H. (1992) ‘Using Competitive Benchmarking to Set Goals.’ Quality Progress, October, pp. 81-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri, K.H. (1993) ‘Questions to answer before benchmarking.’ Planning Review, January-February, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C.A., Chiesa, V. and Coughlan, P. (1994) ‘Developing and testing benchmarking and self assessment frameworks in manufacturing.’ International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1994, pp. 83-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1992) Strategic Benchmarking, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, I.J., Paetsch, K.A. (1998). Benchmarking: a quest for continuous improvement. In: Handbook of Total Quality Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5281-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5281-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7409-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5281-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics