Abstract
This paper explores a number of issues in the design and use of the MSG2 multi-country model for policy simulation analysis. A brief overview of the MSG2 model is presented in Section 2. The use of large scale models with rational expectations such as the MSG2 model has required the development of new numerical algorithms. The solution algorithm that is used to solve the MSG2 model, as well as several other multi-country models including the G-Cubed model (seeMcKibbin and Wilcoxen (1995)), is summarized in Section 3. In Sections 4 and 5 the impact of alternative assumptions about fiscal and monetary closure rules are explored in more detail. In particular the standard assumptions used in the MSG2 model of a incremental interest payments rule for fiscal are compared to other assumptions frequently used in other global models such as a debt targeting rule and a fiscal conservatism rule. In addition, rules for monetary policy such as a fixed stock of money rule, a nominal income mle and an inflation target are compared. Both sets of policy closure assumptions are compared focusing on Australia but the insights generalize across the other countries in the model. It is shown that these assumptions can have some important implications for both the long run and short run impacts of fiscal and monetary policy. A summary is presented in Section 6.
The views expressed arethose of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the trustees. Officers or other staff of the Brookings Institution,or the Australian National University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Argy, V, McKibbin W J and E Siegloff(1989), “Exchange Rate Regimes for a Small Economy in a Multi-Country World”Princeton Studies in International Financeno 67, December.
Brandsma, Andries and Andrew Hughes Hallett (1989), “Macroeconomic policy design with incomplete information”Economic ModellingVol. 6, pp. 432–446.
Bryant, R, Hooper, P, and C Mann (eds) (1993)Evaluating Policy Regimes: New Research in Empirical MacroeconomicsBrookings Institution, Washington DC.
Bryant, R and L Zhang (1996), Intertemporal Fiscal Policy in Macroeconomic Model: Introduction and Major Alternatives. Brookings Discussion Paper in International Economics #123, Washington DC.
Bryant, R and L Zhang (1996), Alternative Specifications of Intertemporal Fiscal Policy in a Small Theoretical Model. Brookings Discussion Paper in International Economics #124, Washington DC.
Currie, David and Simon Wren-Lewis (1990), “Evaluating the extended target zone proposal for G3”Economic JournalVol. 100, pp. 105–23.
Hayashi, F (1982), “Tobins Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation”EconometricaVol. 50, pp. 213–224.
D W Henderson and W McKibbin (1993), “An Assessment of Some Basic Monetary Policy Regime Pairs: Analytical and Simulation Results from Simple Multi-Region Macroeconomic Models”, in Bryant R, Hooper, P, and C Mann (1993)Evaluating Policy Regimes: New Research in Empirical MacroeconomicsBrookings Institution, Washington DC.
Kydland, Finn and Edward Prescott (1977), “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans”Journal of Political EconomyVol. 85, pp. 473–491.
Lucas, R E (1967), “Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply”Journal of Political EconomyVol. 75, pp. 321–334.
Lucas, Robert (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, in Brunner Karl and Alan Meltzer (eds.)The Phillips Curve and Labour MarketsAmsterdam: North-Holland.
McKibbin, W (1993), “Stochastic Simulations of Alternative Monetary Regimes in the MSG2 Model”, in Bryant R, Hooper P, and C Mann (1993)Evaluating Policy Regimes: New Research in Empirical MacroeconomicsBrookings Institution.
McKibbin, W J (1996)The MSG Multi-country Model version 411: User ManualMcKibbin Software Group Inc, Arlington VA, USA
McKibbin, W J (1987), “Solving Rational Expectations Models With and Without Strategic Behavior”, Reserve Bank of Australia Research Discussion Paper 8706, Canberra.
McKibbin, W and P Bagnoli (1993), “Fiscal Deficit Reduction: An Evaluation of Alternatives”, Brookings Discussion Paper in International Economics #101, Washington DC.
McKibbin, W J and J Sachs (1988), “Comparing the Global Performance of Alternative Exchange Arrangements”Journal of International Money and FinanceVol. 7, pp. 387–410.
McKibbin, W J and J Sachs (1991)Global Linkages: Macroeconomic Interdependence and Cooperation in the World EconomyBrookings Institution, Washington DC.
McKibbin, W and P Wilcoxen (1995), “The Theoretical and Empirical Structure of the G-Cubed Model”, Brookings Discussion Paper in International Economics #118, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
Mitchell, P, Sault, S, Smith, P, and K Wallis (1995), “Comparing Global Economic Models”, Global Economic Institutions Working Paper #7, London: CEPR.
Smith, P and K Wallis (1994), “Policy Simulations and Long Run Sustainability in Forward Looking Macroeconometric Model”, ESRC Macroeconomic Modelling Bureau Discussion Paper #34, University of Warwick, UK.
Taylor, J (1993)Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy: From Econometric Design to Practical OperationNew York: WW Norton & Company.
Treadway, A (1969), “On Rational Entrepreneurial Behavior and the Demand for Investment”Review of Economic StudiesVol. 36, pp. 227–239.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKibbin, W.J. (1999). Solving Large Scale Models Under Alternative Policy Closures: The MSG2 Multi-Country Model. In: Hallett, A.H., McAdam, P. (eds) Analyses in Macroeconomic Modelling. Advances in Computational Economics, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5219-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5219-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7378-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5219-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive