Skip to main content

Business Cycle Turning Points: Two Empirical Business Cycle Model Approaches

  • Chapter
Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Economic and Financial Data

Abstract

In the last decade, two business cycle models have dominated discussions and research of empirical business cycles. The first model is the Markov switching model of business cycle phases pioneered by Hamilton (1989). In this nonlinear business cycle model, cycles are composed of expansionary and contractionary phases. Empirically, this model is consistent with the classic research methodology of Burns and Mitchell (1946). The second model is the unobserved dynamic model of Stock and Watson (1989, 1991, 1993). In this linear model, cycles arise from the internal propagation mechanism of the system of equations. Econometrically, this model is consistent with the Frischian view of business cycles. Even though the model is not constructed to model business cycle expansions and contractions, the model is helpful in predicting downturns and upturns in the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, J. and S. Chib (1993a). “Bayes Inference via Gibbs Sampling of Autoregressive Time Series Subject to Markov Mean and Variance Shifts, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, J. and S. Chib (1993b). “Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J. (1978). “On the Econometric Approach to Business Cycle Analysis, Oxford EconomicPapers, 20, 292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J. (1980). “On the Frisch Model of Business Cycles, Oxford Economic Papers, 30, 468–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldin, M. (1992). “Using Switching Models to Study Business Cycle Asymmetries: Overview of Methodology and Application, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Research Paper no. 9211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratley, P., B. Fox and L. Schräge (1987). A Guide to Simulation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, A. (1992). “Conditional Symmetries in Real GNP: A Seminonparametric Approach, Journal of Economics and Business Statistics, 10, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. and E. George (1992). “Explaining the Gibbs Sampler,” The American Statistician, 46, 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvet, M. (1994). “An Econometric Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switching,” unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, B. and L. Summers (1986). “Are Business Cycles Symmetrical?,” in Gordon, R. J. (ed.) The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change. Studies in Business Cycles, no. 25. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. and G. Rudebusch (1991a). “Turning Point Prediction with the Composite Leading Index: An Ex Ante Analysis,” in Lahiri, K. and G. Moore, (eds.) Leading Economic Indicators: New Approaches and Forecasting Records. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. and G. Rudebusch (1991b). “Forecasting Output With the Composite Leading Index: A Real-time Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. and G. Rudebusch (1996). “Measuring Business Cycles: A Modern Perspective,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, B. (1986). “Further Evidence on the Asymmetric Behavior of Economic Time Series Over the Business Cycle,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1096–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, A. (1994). “Business Cycle Phases and Their Transitional Dynamics,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, A. and S. Gordon (1998). “Business Cycle Durations,” Journal of Econometrics, 85, 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, A. and S. Gordon (1994). “Co-movement of International Business Cycles,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1933). “Propagation and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economies,” in Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. and A. Smith (1990). “Sampling-based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1994). “Bayesian Comparison of Econometric Models,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J., M. Keane and D. Runkle (1994). “Statistical Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 80, 125–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C., T. Teräsvirta and H. Anderson (1993). “Modeling NonLinearity Over the Business Cycle,” in Stock, J. and M. Watson (eds.) Business Cycles, Indicators, and Forecasting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1989). “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle,” Econometrica, 57, 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, R. (1992). “Nonparametric Evidence on Asymmetry in Business Cycles Using Aggregate Employment Time Series,” Journal of Econometrics, 51, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymans, S. (1973). “On the Use of Leading Indicators to Predict Cyclical Turning Points,” Brookings Papers On Economic Activity, 2, 339–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, J. (1987). “Predicting the Turning Points of Business and Economic Time Series,” Journal of Business, 60, 201–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1977). “Understanding Business Cycles,” in Brunner, K. and A. H. Meltzer (eds.) Stabilization of the Domestic and International Economy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 5. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuIloch, R. and R. Tsay (1994). “Statistical Analysis of Economic Time Series Via Markov Switching Models,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15, 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuIloch, R. and P. Rossi (1991). “An Exact Likelihood Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 64, 207–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. (1954). “Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting,” Studies in Business Cycles, 1. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. and V. Zarnowitz (1982). “Sequential Signals of Recession and Recovery,” Journal of Business, 55, 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neftçi, S. (1980a). “Optimal Prediction of Cyclical Downturns,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 4, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neftçi, S. (1980b). “Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric Over the Business Cycle?,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1980). “Macroeconomics and Reality,” Econometrica, 48, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. and M. Watson (1989). “New Indexes of Leading and Coincident Indicators,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 351–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. and M. Watson (1991). “A Probability Model of the Coincident Economic Indicators,” in Lahiri, K. and G. H. Moore (eds.) Leading Economic Indicators: New Approaches and Forecasting Records. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. and M. Watson (1989). “A Procedure for Predicting Recessions With Leading Indicators: Econometric issues and Recent Experience,” in Stock, J. and M. Watson (eds.) Business Cycles, Indicators, and Forecasting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. and W. Wong (1987). “The Calculation of Posterior Distributions By Data Augmentations (With Discussion),” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M (1994). “Business Cycle Durations and Postwar Stabilization of the U.S. Economy,” American Economic Review, 84, 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wecker, W. (1979). “Predicting the Turning Points of a Time Series,” Journal of Business, 52, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A, C. Hong and G. Gulati (1990). “Turning Points in Economic Time Series, Loss Structures and Bayesian Forecasting,” in Geisser, S., J.S. Hodges, S.J. Press, and A. Zellner (eds.) Bayesian and Likelihood Methods in Statistics and Econometrics: Essays in Honor of George A. Barnard. Amsterdam and New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filardo, A.J., Gordon, S.F. (1999). Business Cycle Turning Points: Two Empirical Business Cycle Model Approaches. In: Rothman, P. (eds) Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Economic and Financial Data. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5129-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7334-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5129-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics