Abstract
Stimulated by curiosity as well as by necessity, we undertake studies of various phenomena and the processes that seem to produce them. Our initial explanations of the process by which some phenomenon is produced may often be oversimplified or possibly entirely mistaken. But, as our research continues we begin to recognize more elements of this process and the manner in which they appear to interact in producing the phenomenon of interest. In other words, as discovery lurches forward we begin to capture more of what we might regard as complexities or subtleties involving these elements and their interactions. In the last decade or so there has been growing interest in the study of complexity itself. Research in what has been called the science of complexity [Waldrop, 1992, 9; Casti,1994, 269-274] has brought together persons from many disciplines who, in the past, might not have been so congenial to the thought of collaborating. At present there are various accounts of what complexity means and how it emerges. In some studies it is observed that simple processes can produce complex phenomena; in others, it is observed that what we often regard as simple phenomena are the result of complex processes. But these observations are not new by any means. Years ago Poincare observed [1905, 147]:
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, P. The eightfold way to the theory of complexity. In: Cowan, G., Pines, D., Meltzer, D. [eds] Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Proceedings Volume XIX, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1994, 7–16.
Anderson, T., Twining, W. Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore’s Science of Judicial Proof. Little, Brown & Co. Boston, 1991.
Casti, J. Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise, Harper Collins, N.Y., 1994.
Caves, C. Entropy and information: How much information is needed to assign a probability? In: Zurek, W. [ed] Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of nformation. Proceedings Volume VIII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1990, 91–115.
Cohen, J., Stewart, I. The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity in a Complex World. Penguin Books, N.Y.,1994.
Cohen, L. J. The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1977.
Cooper, G. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42:393–405.
Cornwell, J. (ed) Nature’s Imagination: The Frontiers of Scientific Vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995
Coveny, P., Highfield, R. Frontiers of Complexity: The Search for Order in a Chaotic World, Fawcett-Columbine, N.Y., 1995.
Cowan, G., Pines, D., Meltzer, D. [eds] iitComplexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Proceedings Volume XIX, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1994.
Crutchfield, J. Is anything ever new?: Considering emergence. In: Cowan, G., Pines, D., Meltzer, D. [eds] Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Proceedings Volume XIX, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1994, 515–537.
Daston, L. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988.
de Finetti, B. Probability, Induction and Statistics: The Art of Guessing. Wiley, N. Y., 1972.
Dodson, J. D. Simulation Design for a TEAS Simulation Research Facility. Planning Research Corporation, Los Angeles, CA. Report No. PRC R-194, 15 November, 1961.
Edwards, W. Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Human Factors, 4:59–73, 1962.
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., Savage, L. J. Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 1963, 193–242.
Edwards, W., Schum, D., Winkler, R. Murder and (of) the likelihood principle. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3: 75–89, 1990.
Fisher, R. A. The Design of Experiments. 7th ed. Hafner, N. Y., 1960
Gell-Mann, M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. W. H. Freeman & Co. N.Y., 1994.
Gell-Mann, M. Complex adaptive systems, In: Morowitz, H., Singer, J. [eds] The Mind, The Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems. Proceedings Volume XXII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1995, 11–23.
Good, I. J. Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1983.
Hacking, I. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
Heckerman, D. Probabilistic Similarity Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1991
Holland, J. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Helix Books, Addison Wesley, N. Y., 1995
Jaynes, E. T., Probability in quantum theory. In: Zurek, W. [ed] Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Proceedings Volume VIII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1990, 381–403.
Jeffrey, R. The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,. 1983.
Kadane, J. Parallel and sequential computation: A statistican’s view. Journal of Complexity, 1, 1985, 256–263.
Kadane, J., Schum, D. A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. Wiley, N. Y., 1996.
Kadane, J., Wasilkowski, G. Average case e-complexity in computer science — A Bayesian view. Bayesian Statistics, 2, 1985, 361–374.
Kauffman, S. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
Kellert, S. In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993.
Kolmogorov, A. N. Foundations of the Theory of Probability (1933). 2d English ed. Chelsea Publishing, N. Y. 1956.
Lewin, R. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos, Collier Books, N.Y., 1993. Lorenz, E. The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1993.
Mainzer, K. Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
Michalski, R. Toward a unified theory of learning: Basic ideas and a classification of learning processes. In: Proceedings of the First World Conference on the Fundamentals of Artifical Intelligence. Paris, July 1–5, 1991.
Morowitz, H., Singer, J. [eds] The Mind, The Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems. Proceedings Volume XXII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1995.
Murphy, M., O’Neill, L. [eds]What is Life? Speculations on the Future of Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
Neapolitan, R. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms. Wiley, N.T., 1990.
Peak, D., Frame, M. Chaos Under Control: The Art and Science of Complexity. W. H. Freeman, N. Y. 1994.
Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. 1988
Penrose, R. The Large, the Small, and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997
Poincare, H. Science and Hypotheses [1905]. Dover, N. Y., 1952.
Prigogine, I., Stengers, I. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature, Bantam Books, N.Y., 1984.
Ruelle, D. Chance and Chaos. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1991
Schum, D. Contrast effects in inference: On the conditioning of current evidence by prior evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18: 217–253, 1977.
Schum, D. Sorting out the effects of witness sensitivity and response criterion placement on the inferential value of testimonial evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27: 153–196, 1981.
Schum, D. Knowledge, probability and credibility. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2: 39–62, 1989.
Schum, D. Hearsay from a layperson. Cardozo Law Review, 14(1): 1–77, 1992.
Schum, D. Probability and the processes of discovery, proof, and choice. Boston University Law Review, 66(3-4), 825–876, 1986.
Schum, D. Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Wiley, N. Y., 1994.
Scott, A. Stairway to the Mind: The Controversial New Science of Consciousness. Copernicus, Springer-Verlag, N. Y., 1995.
Shafer, G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976
Singer, J. Mental processes and brain architecture: confronting the complex adaptive systems of human thought (an overview). In: Morowitz, H., Singer, J. [eds] The Mind, The Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems. Proceedings Volume XXII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1995, 1–9.
Stewart, I. Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos, Blackwell, Oxford, 1990.
Tillers, P., Schum, D. Charting new territory in judicial proof: Beyond Wigmore. Cardozo Law Review, 9(3):907–966, 1988.
Todhunter, I. [1865]. A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability: From the Time of Pascal to that of Laplace. Chelsea Publishing, N. Y. 1965.
von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W., Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
Waldrop, M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Simon & Schuster, N.Y., 1992.
Wigmore, J. H. The problem of proof. Illinois Law Review, 8(2):77–103, 1913.
Wigmore, J. H. The Science of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials. 3d ed. Little, Brown, Boston, 1937.
Young, W., Kaiser, D. Postmortem: New Evidence in the Case of Sacco and Vanzetti. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, 1985.
Zurek, W. [ed] Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Proceedings Volume VIII, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Addison-Wesley, N.Y., 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schum, D.A. (1999). Probabilistic Reasoning and the Science of Complexity. In: Shanteau, J., Mellers, B.A., Schum, D.A. (eds) Decision Science and Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7315-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5089-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive