Skip to main content

How do distributed design organizations act together to create a meaningful design?

Towards a process model for design coordination

  • Chapter
Book cover Computers in Building

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a longer-term research project that looked at CAAD as an enabler of completely new collaborative processes rather than as a support for existing collaborative processes. In order to question existing design processes and invent new collaborative processes systematically, we applied a process modeling methodology that employed recent developments in coordination theory. The methodology contained four steps: (1) Decomposition, (2) Dependency Analysis, (3) Process Substitution, and (4) Recomposition. In this paper, we describe how this approach was used to redesign a sample collaborative design process in building design, and present the resulting process coordination model. We describe the implications of this model for the development of collaborative environments, and illustrate its practical application in a case study. We conclude by reiterating the contributions made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakos, Y. N., “A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces,” MIS Quarterly, 15,3 (1991), pp. 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J.Y., and Pollalis, S.N., A Framework for the Design Process, No. LCT-87-2, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MA, November 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., Object-oriented analysis and design with applications, Redwood, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P.P.S., “The entity-relationship model: Toward a unified view of data,” ACM Trans. Database Syst., 1,1, pp. 9–36, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitte, P., Pourteau, C., “IDEF enterprise engineering methodologies support simulation,” Manufacturing Systems: Information Technology for Manufacturing Managers (March 1997), pp. 70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarevic Branko, Schmitt G., Hirschberg U., Kurmann D., Johnson B., An Experiment in Design Collaboration, in Proceedings of (CD): ACADIA’ 98 conference, Quebec City, October 22–25, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Interorganizational Information Systems in Design, Doctoral Dissertation, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., and S. N. Pollalis, “Knowledge, Agency, and Design Information Systems,” in R. Junge (ed.), CAAD Futures’ 97, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, T., and C. M. Eastman, “A Database Architecture for Design Collaboration”, Proceedings of TeamCAD Workshop on Collaborative Design, Atlanta, May, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, R. (ed.). CAAD Futures 1997, Dordrecht: Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W., and Crowston, K., “The interdisciplinary study of coordination,” ACM Computing Surveys, 1994 (March), 26(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., and Pentland, B., ”Tools for inventing organizations: Towards a handbook of organizational processes,” Working Paper, Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Coordination Science, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Object-Oriented Analysis and Design, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollalis, S.N., “Towards the Automation of Conceptual Design,” In Tzonis, A., and White, I. (eds.), Automation Based Creative Design: Current Issues in Computers and Architecture, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt G., Architektur mit dem Computer, Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden, Oktober 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtowicz, I. (ed.) Virtual Design Studio. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yourdon, E., Modern Structured Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huang, J. (1999). How do distributed design organizations act together to create a meaningful design?. In: Augenbroe, G., Eastman, C. (eds) Computers in Building. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5047-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5047-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7294-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5047-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics