Skip to main content

Coronary Atherectomy

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 217))

Abstract

Transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has grown rapidly in the last decade with increasing operator experience and advances in balloon technology. It is estimated that more than 500,000 procedures will be performed in the United States this year. Recent data document a very high procedural success rate of PTCA; upwards of 95%.1,2 However, there remains three major limitation to the balloon technique: 1) acute closure causing ischemic complications in about 5%32) lesions unsuitable for intervention in about 45%4 and 3) restenosis rate of about 50%.5 There has been a great deal of enthusiasm in developing alternative mechanical means to alter luminal geometry in order to decrease restenosis and intense research efforts are being focused on pharmacological means of preventing smooth muscle hyperplasia; the histologic etiology of restenosis.6 Secondary goals driving the development of new devices have been to reduce the incidence of acute complications and extend the applicability of percutaneous interventional technique to lesions that previously were considered unsuitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Topol EJ, et al. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance claim database. Circulation 1993: 87: 1489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Detre K, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981. N Engl J Med 1988: 318: 265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lincoff AM, et al. Abrupt vessel closure complicating coronary angioplasty: Clinical, angiographic and therapeutic profile. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 19: 926.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forrester JS, Eiger N, Litvack F. Interventioanl cardiology: The decade ahead. Circulation 1991: 84: 942.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nobuyoshi M, et al. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: Serial angiographic follow-up of 299 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988: 12: 616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Popma JJ, Califf RM, Topol EJ. Clinical Trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1991: 84: 1426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Penny WF, et al. Insights into the mechanism of luminal improvement after directional coronary atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 1991: 67: 435.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuntz RE, et al. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation 1992: 86: 1827.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Umans VA, et al. Restenosis after directional atherectomy and balloon angioplasty: Comparative analysis based on matched lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993: 21: 1382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Safian RD, et al. Coronary atherectomy clinical angiographic and histological findings and observations regarding potential mechanisms. Circulation 1990: 82: 69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson D, et al. Acute complications of directional coronary atherectomy are related to the morphology of excised stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 19: 76A.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garratt KN, et al. Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: Differences between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990: 16: 1665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuntz RE, Hinohara T, Safian RD. Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: Effects of luminal diameter and deep wall excision. Circulation 1992: 86: 1394–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Isner JM, et al, for the CAVEAT Investigators. Coronary thrombus: Clinical features and angiographic diagnosis in 370 patients studied by directional atherectomy. Circulation 1992: 86: 2583.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christou GP, et al. Histopathological correlation of coronary arteriographic lesion morphology using directed atherectomy derived specimens: frequent thrombus in complex lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 19: 375A.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma SK, et al. Lipid rich plaques with thrombus are common in unstable rest angina: Observations from artherectomy tissue analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995 25: 281A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis SG, et al. Relation of stenosis morphology and clinical presentation to the procedural results of directional coronary atherectomy. Circulation 1991: 84: 644.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Popma JJ, et al. Abrupt vessel closure after directional coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 19: 1372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hinohara T, et al. Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 20: 623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fishman RF, et al. Long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy: Predictors of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 20: 1101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Topol EJ, et al, for the CAVEAT study group: A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1993: 329: 221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elliot JM, et al. One-year follow-up in the coronary angioplasty versus excisional atherectomy trial (CAVEAT I). Circulation 1995: 91: 2158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adelman AG, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1993: 329: 228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes DR, et al. The CAVEAT-II investigators. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. Circulation 1995: 91: 1966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bairn DS, et al. The BOAT investigators. Final results in the balloon vs optimal atherectomy trial (BOAT): 6 month angiography and 1 year clinical follow-up. Circulation 1996: 94: 1–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Simonton CA, et al. Acute and late clinical and angiographic results of directional atherectomy in the optimal atherectomy restenosis study. Circulation 1995: 95: 1–544.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen DJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of directional atherectomy, stenting and conventional angioplasty in single-vessel disease: A decision-analytic model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993: 21: 227A.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Murchu B, et al. Role of IABP Counterpulsation in High Risk Atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995: 26: 1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prevosti LG, et al. Particulate debris from rotational atherectomy: size, distribution and physiologic effect. Circulation 1988: 78: II–83.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacIsaac A, et al. Angiographic predictors of outcome of coronary rotational atherectomy from the completed multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 23: 353.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brown DL, Buchbinder M. Incidence, predictors and consequences of coronary dissection following high speed rotational atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 1996: 78: 1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen B, et al. Coronary perforation during rotational ablation: Angiographic determinants and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 23: 354.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ellis SG, et al. Relation of clinical presentation, stenosis morphology, and operator technique to the procedural results of rotational atherectomy and rotational atherectomy-facilitated angioplasty. Circulation 1994: 89: 882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Warth DC, et al. Rotational atherectomy multicenter registry: Acute results, complications and 6-month angiographic follow-up in 709 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 24: 641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vandormael M, et al. Comparison of excimer laser, rotablator and balloon angioplasty for the treatment of complex lesions: ERBAC study final results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994: 23: 57A.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mintz GS, et al. Rotational atherectomy followed by adjunct stents: the preferred therapy for calcified large vessels. Circulation 1995: 92 9(Suppl I): 1–329.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Braden GA, et al. Abciximab decreases both the incidence and magnitude of creatine kinase elevation during rotational atherectomy J Am Coll Cardiol 1997: 29: 499A.

    Google Scholar 

  38. O’Murchu B, et al. Role of IABP Counterpulsation in High Risk Atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995: 26: 1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prevosti LG, et al. Particulate debris from rotational atherectomy: size, distribution and physiologic effect. Circulation 1988: 78: 11–83.

    Google Scholar 

  40. MacIsaac A, et al. Angiographic predictors of outcome of coronary rotational atherectomy from the completed multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 23: 353.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Brown DL, Buchbinder M. Incidence, predictors and consequences of coronary dissection following high speed rotational atherectomy. Am J Cardiol 1996: 78: 1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen B, et al. Coronary perforation during rotational ablation: Angiographic determinants and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 23: 354.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ellis SG, et al. Relation of clinical presentation, stenosis morphology, and operator technique to the procedural results of rotational atherectomy and rotational atherectomy-facil-itated angioplasty. Circulation 1994: 89: 882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Warth DC, et al. Rotational atherectomy multicenter registry: Acute results, complications and 6-month angiographic follow-up in 709 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994: 24: 641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vandormael M, et al. Comparison of excimer laser, rotablator and balloon angioplasty for the treatment of complex lesions: ERBAC study final results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994: 23: 57A.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mintz GS, et al. Rotational atherectomy followed by adjunct stents: the preferred therapy for calcified large vessels. Circulation 1995: 92 (Suppl I): 1–329.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Braden GA. Abciximab decreases both the incidence and magnitude of creatine kinase elevation during rotational atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997: 29: 499A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S.K., Kini, A.S. (1999). Coronary Atherectomy. In: Contemporary Concepts in Cardiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 217. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5007-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5007-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7274-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5007-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics