Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Options for Coronary Revascularization

  • Chapter
Contemporary Concepts in Cardiology

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 217))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

The discovery of the use of balloon angioplasty was accomplished by Dotter in dy1963, when he recanalized an occluded right iliac artery by passing a percutaneously introduced catheter retrograde through the occlusion to perform an abdominal aortogram in a patient with renal artery stenosis.1–5 On September 16th, 1977, the first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in a human was performed by Gruentzig, in Zurich. Gruentzig et al. followed this first report with the first 50 coronary angioplasties in 1979.6–10

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dotter CT. Presented at the 1963 Czech Radiological Congress, June 10, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dotter CT. Transluminal angioplasty: a long view. Radiology 1980;135: 561.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dotter CT, Judkins MP. Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction: description of a new technic and a preliminary report of its application. Circulation 1964;30: 654.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dotter CT. Cardiac catheterization and angiographic techniques: the future. Czech Radiologic 1965;19: 217.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dotter CT, Judkins MP. Percutaneous transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction. Radiol 1965;31: 453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruentzig A. Die perkutane rekanalisation chronischer arterieller verschlusse (Dotter-Prinzip) mit einem neuen dopplleumigen dilation-skatheter. Fortschr Roentgenstr 1976;124: 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruentzig A. Perkutane dilatation von coronarstenosen-beschriebungeines neuen katheter-systems. Klin Wochenschr 1976;54: 543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruentzig A, Turina MI, Schneider JA. Experimental percutaneous dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 1976;54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hurst JW. The first coronary angioplasty as described by Andreas Gruentzig. Am J Cardiol 1986;57: 185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gruentzig A, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary artery stenosis: percuataneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1979;301: 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller RL, Sanborn TA. The history of interventional cardiology: Cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, and related interventions. Am Heart J 1995;129: 146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Livesay JJ, et al. Preliminary report on laser coronary endarterectomy in patients. Circulation 1985;72.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cumberland DC, et al. Percutaneous laser thermal angioplasty: intial clinical restults with a laser probe in total peripheral artery occlustions. Lancet 1986;1: 1457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cumberland DC, et al. Percutaneous laser-assisted coronary angioplasty. Lancet 1986;2: 214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Litvack F, et al. Percutaneous excimer laser coronary angioplasty: Results in the first consecutive 3,000 patients. J Am Col Cardiol 1994;23: 323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Strauss BH, et al. Early and late quantitative angiographic evaluation of vein graft lesions treated by excimer laser with adjunctive balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1995;92: 348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Appleman YEA, et al. Ranomised trial of excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Lancet 1996;347: 79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson JB, et al. Transluminal atherectomy: a new approach to the treatment of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 1985;72: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson JB. How atherectomy began: a personal history. Am J Cardiol 1993;73: 3–5E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson JB, et al. Transluminal coronary atherectomy: results in 21 human cadaver vascular segments. Circulation 1986;74: 202.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simpson JB, et al. Transluminal atherectomy: initial clinical results in 27 patients. Circulation 1986;74: 203.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simpson JB, Robertson GC, Selmon MR. Percutaneous coronary atherectomy. Circulation 1988;78: 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Topol E, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elliott JM, et al. One-year follow-up in the coronary angioplasty versus excisional atherectomy trial (CAVEAT I). Circulation 1995; 91: 2158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Adelman A, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baim DS, et al. Acute results of the randomized phase of the balloon versus optimal atherectomy trial (BOAT). Circulation 1995;92(Suppl): I–544.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Popma JJ, et al. Early and late quantitative antiographic outcomes in the Optimal Atherectomy Restenosis Study (OARS). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; Suppl A: 291A.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahnn S, et al. Treatment of focal atheromatous lesions by angioscopically guided high speed rotary atherectomy. J Vasc Surg 1988;7: 292.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zacca NM, et al. Treatment of syptomatic peripheral atherosclerotic disease with a rotational atherectomy device. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Warth D, et al. Rotational atherectomy multicenter registry: acute results, complications and 6-month angiographic follow-up in 709 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24: 641–648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis S, et al. Relation of clinical presentation, stenosis morphology, and operator technique to the procedural results of rotational atherectomy-facilitated angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89: 882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. MacIsaac AI, et al. High speed rotational atherectomy: outcome in calcified and noncalcified coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26: 731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dotter CT. Transluminally placed coil-spring endarterial tube grafts: long-term patency in canine popliteal artery. Invest Radiol 1969, 4: 329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dotter CT, et al. Tranluminal expandable nitinol coil stent grafting: preliminary report. Radiology 1983, 147: 259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sigwart U, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlustion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987;316: 701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Palmaz JC, et al. Expandable intraluminal graft: a preliminary study. Radiology 1985, 156: 73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Palmaz JC, et al. Expandable intraluminal vascular graft: afeasibitlity study. Surgery 1986;99: 199.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roubin GS. Early and late results of intracoronary arterial stenting after coronary angioplasty in dogs. Circulation 1987;76: 891–897.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Serruys PW et al, for the Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schatz RA et al, for the STRESS investigators. Stent REStenosis Study (STRESS): analysis of in-hospital results. Circulation 1993;88(Suppl): 594.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fischman DL, et al, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331: 496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Colombo A, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995;91: 1676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Serruys PW and the BENESTENT Study Group. BENESTENT-II pilot study: 6 months follow-up of phase 1, 2, and 3. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl I): I–542

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hoffmann R, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996;94: 1247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dussaillant GR, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a olumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26: 720.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mintz GS, et al. Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996;94: 35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Painter JA, et al. Serial intravascular ultrasound studies fail to show evidence of chronic Palmaz-Schatz stent recoil. Am J Cardiol 1995;75: 398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mintz GS, et al. Endovascular stent reduce restinosis by eliminating geometric arterial remodeling: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(Suppl A): 36A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leon M, Wong C. Intracoronary stents: A breakthrough technology or just another small step? Circulation 1994;89: 1323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Laird JR, et al. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation with low-dose irradiation from a b-emitting stent. Circulation 1996;93: 529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hong MK, et al. Continuous subcutaneous angiopeptim reduces neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary in-stent restenosis model. Circulation, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Scheerder IK, et al. Angiopeptin loaded stents inhibit the neointimal reaction induced by polymer coated stents implanted in porcine coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; Suppl A: 36A.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Goldberg SL, et al. Benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cariol 1994;24: 996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. EPIC Investigators. Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIa recptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1994;330: 956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hollman Jl. Myocardial Revascularization: coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery indications. Med Clin North Am 1992;76: 1083.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. ACC/AHA guidelines and indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1991;83: 1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Eleven year survival in the VA trial of bypass surgery for stable angina. N Engl J Med 1984;311: 1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Eurpean Coronary surgery Study Group. Prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris. Circulation 1982;65 (Supp I): 1167.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Coronary Artery Surgery Study Principal Investigators and their associates. Myocardial infarction and mortaligy in the CASS randomized trial. N Eng J Med 1984;310: 750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hise JH, Nipper ML, Schnitker JC. Stroke associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12: 811.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Shaw PJ, et al. Neurologic and neuropsychological morbidity following major surgery: comparison of coronary artery bypass and peripheral vascular surgery. Stroke 1987; 18: 700.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Smith PLD, et al. Cerebral consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass. Lancet 1986; 1: 823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Campeau L, et al. Aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass graft changes 5 to 7 years after surgery. Circulation 1978, 58(Suppl I): I–170–1755.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Compeau L, et al. Patency of saphenous vein bypass grafts at two weeks and at one year in two series of consecutive patients. Circulation 1975;52: 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Compeau L, et al. The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous vein bypass grafts and the progression of disease in the native circulation. A study 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1984;311: 1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Cameron A, Kemp HG, Green GE. Bypass surgery with the internal mammary artery graft: 15 year follow-up. Circulation 1986; 74(Suppl III): III30–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Rodriquez A, et al. Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease. In hospital results and 1 year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22: 1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. RITA Trial Participants. Coronary angioplasty vs. coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized InterventionTreatment of Angina trial. Lancet 1993;34: 573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hamm CW, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass srugery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331: 1037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. CABRI Trial Participants. First-year results of the Coronary Angioplasty vs Bypass Revascularisation Investigation. Lancet 1995;346: 1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. King S, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994;331: 1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Pocock SJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet 1995;346: 1184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Popma JJ, Topol EJ. Factors influencing restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Am J Med 1990;88: 1–16N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Hirshfeld JW, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: A multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. de Groote P, et al. Local lesion-related factors and restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Evidence from a quantitative angiographic study in patients with unstable angina undergoing double-vessel angioplasty. Circulation 1995;91: 967.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Violaris AG, Meldert R, Serruys PW. Long-term luminal renarrowing after successful elective coronary angioplasty of total occlusions. Circulation 1995;91: 2140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kuntz RE, et al. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21: 15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Kuntz RE, Bairn DS. Defining coronary restenosis. Newer clinical and angiographic paradigms. Circulation 1993;88: 1310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Mehran R, et al. Mechanisms and results of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of Instent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Yokoi H, et al. Long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic follow-up after the Palmaz-Schatz stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(Suppl A): 224A.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Coffee CE, et al. Natural history of cerebral complications of coronary artery bypass graft surtery. Neurology 1983;33: 1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sotaniemi KA, Mononen H, Hokkanen TE. Long term cerebral outcome after open heart surgery. A five year neuropsychological follow-up study. Stroke 1986;17: 410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Aris A, et al. Arterial line filtrationduring cardio-pulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;91: 526.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Smith PLC, et al. Cerebral consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass. Lancet 1986;1: 823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Kirklin JW, Blackstone Eh, Rogers WJ. The plights of the invasive treatment of ischemic heart desease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5: 158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Holmes DR Jr, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. Circulation 1995;91: 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Douglas JS, et al. Randomized trial of coroanry stent and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of saphenous vein graft stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; Suppl A: 178A.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Barner HB, et al. Late patency of the internal mammary artery as a coronary bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34: 408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Tector AJ, et al. The internal mammary artery graft. Its longevity after coronary bypass. JAMA 1983;246: 2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Grondin CM, et al. Comarison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation 1984;70: Suppl 1: I–208.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Schuster EH, Griffith LS, Bukley BH. Preponderance of acute procimal left anterior descending coronary arterial lesions in fatal myocardial infarction. A clinicopathologic study. Am J Cardiol 1981;47: 1189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Loop FD, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events N Engl J Med 1986;314: 1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Benetti F, et al. Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Chest 1991;100: 312.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Pfister AJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass AnnThora Surg 1992;54: 1085.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Fannin W, Kakos G, Williams T. Reoperative coronary bypass without coronary pulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55: 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Acuff TE, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61: 135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Roxana Mehran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin B. Leon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mehran, R., Leon, M.B. (1999). Treatment Options for Coronary Revascularization. In: Contemporary Concepts in Cardiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 217. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5007-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5007-5_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7274-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5007-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation