Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 15))

Abstract

The decision of the FCC in the United States to select an all-digital HDTV system was a surprise to HDTV supporters in Europe and Japan. Both had adopted hybrid systems with both analog and digital features. Western Europe was quicker than Japan to move away from its previous arrangements. It dropped HD-MAC in June 1993 and moved on to create the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) group to support digital television. It also responded by increasing EU support for wide-screen standard definition television programming and manufacturing. In Japan, NHK and its allies strongly resisted the idea of abandoning MUSE Hi-Vision but some of the major consumer electronics manufacturers and the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications (MPT) wanted to speed up the transition to an all-digital HDTV system. NHK was able to delay adoption of all-digital HDTV approach until mid 1997. In this paper, I consider these two stories separately, and then try to explain the differences in the reactions of the two regions

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note

  1. This was Decision 93/424/EEC. For a history of this document see the previous HDTV Report from Stanford Resources, Inc. See also the historical information provided by the EU at http://apollo.cordis.lu.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Second Annual Report on Progress in Implementing the Action Plan for the Introduction of Advanced Television Services in Europe. Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, and the Economic and Social Committee, COM (96) 346 Final, Brussels, July 26. 1996, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In mid 1997. the member organizations was 200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The DVB Group benefited from the earlier work of the European Launching Group for Digital Video Broadcasting, beginning in 1991, under the leadership of Peter Kahl of the German Ministry of Telecommunications. See Xiudan Dai, Corporate Strategy. Public Policy and New Technologies: Philips and the European Consumer Electronics Industry (London: Pergamon. 1996), pp. 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The group had been meeting on an ad hoc basis for over a year prior to the signing of the memorandum of understanding. A smaller pan-European group began to discuss digital television in 1991 soon after the announcement by General Instrument in the United States that it had succeeded in building an all-digital HDTV system. D. Wood, “The DVB Project: Philosophy and Core System,” Electronics and Communication Engineering Journal. 9:1 (February 1997), p. 5; Suzanne Perry, “European Group to Announce Digital HDTV Strategy,” The Reuter Business Report. May 26, 1993; and Andrew Hill, “Europe Switches Over to Digital TV,” The Financial Times. December 17,1993, p. 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivo Addams, Reshaping TV for the Information Society. Background Brief for the European Commission’s Conference on Wide-Screen Television (Brussels: 1996). Ivo Addams is a pseudonym for Adam Watson-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wood. p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ulrich Reimers, “DVB-T: The COFDM-Based System for Terrestrial Television,” Electronics and Communcation Engineering Journal. 9:1 (February 1997), 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DVB Press Release dated May 29, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph Flaherty, “2000 and Beyond…The Digital Milennium,” HDTV Newsletter, 11 (June-July 1997), pp. 29–32: and “Flaherty Says TV Set-Makers Are Stalling European HDTV,” Communications Daily, June 11, 1997, via Nexis-Lexis. See also Joel Brinkley, “U.S. and Europe in Battle Over Digital TV,” New York Times, August 25, 1997, via the world wide web at http://www.nytimes.com.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting: The Government’s Proposals (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. August 1995), CM 2946

    Google Scholar 

  13. See the BBC web site at http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/digital/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “Digital Television Network: Evidence to the Inquiry into the Future of the BBC and British Broadcasting,” M2 Presswire, February 21, 1997, via Nexis-Lexis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raymond Snoddy. “BIB Plans Shopping Lines on Terrestrial Television,” Financial Times, May 6, 1997. p. 22, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Hyundai-TV/COM and Grundig Alliance Awarded Digital Satellite Receiver Contract by British Sky Broadcasting,” Business Wire, May 7, 1997, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raymond Snoddy, “ITC: Challenge Over Award of Digital Licenses,” Financial Times, June 25, 1997, via the world wide web at http://www.ft.com/hippocampus/723c6.html.

    Google Scholar 

  18. “EU’s Van Miert Voices Concern Over BDB Digital TV License Bid,” AFX New, June 5, 1997. via Nexis-Lex

    Google Scholar 

  19. “Germany’s Ground Breaking Multimedia Legislation,” Newsbytes,, December 22, 1995, via Lexis-Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. “Mediaset Agreement Reached with Strategic Partners: A First Step Towards a Public Offering of the Company,” PR Newswire, July 20, 1995, via Lexis-Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elie Noam, Television in Europe (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hans J. Kleinsteuber, “New Media Technologies in Europe: The Politics of Satellite, HDTV, and DAB,” Irish Communications Review, 5 (1995), pp. 12–14; John Peterson, “Toward a Common European Industrial Policy: The Case of High Definition Television,” Department of Politics, University of York, n.d., p. 12; and Peter Humphreys, Media and Media Policy in Germany: The Press and Broadcasting Since 1945, 2nd edition (Providence. R.I.: Berg. 1994). pp. 270-271.

    Google Scholar 

  23. “Euro Pay TV Alliance Appears to Hit Snag,” The Reuter European Community Report, June 5, 1996, accessed via Nexis-Lexis

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ashley Seager, “Germany’s Vebacom, Metro Set Up Digital TV Firm,” The Reuter European Business Report, March 5, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis; Judy Dempsey, “Fight to the Finish in German Digital Television: Kirch’s Lead Over Bertelsmann in the Race to the Marketplace May Be Shortlived,” Financial Times, March 12, 1996, p. 31, via Nexis Lexis. The remaining MMBG partners criticized the D-box for precisely the same reasons that Kirch had objected to the Seca decoder: that it would require consumers to purchase a separate decoder for each new pay-TV service.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dempsey, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  26. “Kirch’s DF1 Channels Energy Toward Christmas Shoppers,” Variety, October 28, 1996 to November 3. 1996, p. 37, via Nexis-Lexis; “Kirch’s Digital TV Hits Launch Snag,” The Reuter European Business Report. July 4, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See the Bertelsmann web site at http.V/www.bertelsmann.de/bag/gesch_ber96/bmg/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peter Klanowski. “Ufa/CLT Deal Cleared,” Tele-satellit News, October 8, 1996, via the world wide web at http://www.tele-satellit.com.

    Google Scholar 

  29. “CLT-Ufa to Pay DM850M in Kirch TV Pact,” Dow Jones Newswires, July 17, 1997, via the world wide web at http://www.wsj.com.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Astra’s web site at http://www.astra.lu/company/poress/97/970828.html.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Erik Kirschbaum, “ARD Attacks Pay TV: German Pubcaster Calls Feevee Unfair,” Daily Variety, May 21, 1996, p. 10, accessed via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frederick Studemann, “Pay-TV: German Rivals Agree Joint Venture,” Financial Times, June 24, 1997, via the world wide web at http://www-fixom.

    Google Scholar 

  35. “Hyundai to Incorporate OpenTV Technology in Set-Top Boxes for Nethold Networks,” Business Wire. November 20, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Amy Barrett, “Canal Satellite Anticipates Passing Its Subscriber Goal,” Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition, August 25, 1997, accessed via the world wide web at http://www.wsj.com: and Melissa Pozsgay. “Canal Plus, TPS Back-to-School TV Battle,” Bloomberg News, August 18, 1997, via the world wide web at http://nytsyn.com/live/News/230_081897_110001_25750.html.

    Google Scholar 

  37. “Interactive Multimedia Trial for Paris Cable,” New Media. Markets, June 29, 1995, via Nexis-Lexis; and “Cable Modem Trial Takes Off in French Riviera: French Cable Operators Increasingly Are Looking to the Internet as a Revenue Source,” European Media Business and Finance, July 29, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For details, see Joel Brinkley, Defining Vision: The Battle for the Future of Television (Neu York: Harcourt Brace, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  39. John Sie, “HDTV and Japan, Inc.” unpublished manuscript, Tele-Communications, Inc., Denver. Colorado. revised draft, April 28, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Japan Economic Newswire, April 5, 1993, story 11, p. 1; “NHK Develops Converter for Japanese, European HDTV Sets,” Agence France Presse, October 13, 1992, via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  41. “Is Widescreen Killing Japanese HDTV?” Consumer Electronics, February 28, 1994, vol. 34, No.9,via 303.R.I.:Be

    Google Scholar 

  42. “Fujitsu Develops Low-Cost HDTV Image Processing Chip Set,” Comline, Decrg, 1994), pp. 270–271. 1996. ac

    Google Scholar 

  43. “Japan Widescreen Broadcasting,” Consumer Electronics, June 17 cessed via Nexis-Lexis. Dempsey

    Google Scholar 

  44. Eiji Kawabata, “The Politics of HDTV in the U.S. and Japan,” paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August, op cit. July 4, 1996, via Ne

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Reuter Asia-Pacific Business Report, April 28, 1994, via Nexis-Lexis

    Google Scholar 

  46. Keiji Urakami, “HDTV Format Switch Not to Change Makers’ Basic Strategy,” Japan Economic Newswire. February 23, 1994. via Nexis-Lexis; Yoshiko Hara, “Japan Still Riding Digital Fence.” Electronic Engineering Times Interactive, March 7, 1994, p. 40, via the world wide web at http://tech.web; and “NHK Plans 50” Plasma Tube,“ Consumer Electronics, June 13. 1994, Vol. 34, No. 24, via Nexis-Lexis. See also Junji Matsuzaki, “The Scenario for Hi-Vision Broadcasting in Japan,” unpublished manuscript, NH bag/gesch_ber96/bmg/

    Google Scholar 

  47. “Panel Urges Digital Broadcasting Standard by 1996,” Japan Economic Newswire (Kyodo), April 27. 1994; and The Reuter Asia-Pacific Business Report, April http://www.tele-sa index.html.t

    Google Scholar 

  48. An English translation can be found at: web at http://w http://www.mpt.go.jp/policyreports/english/Broadcastellit.com.wide

    Google Scholar 

  49. COMLINE Daily News Electronics, ww.wsj.com./company/poress/97/9

    Google Scholar 

  50. Junko Yoshida, “Japan’s Broadcast Entity Drags Feet,” Electronic Engineering Times Interactive. July 31, 1970 828.html..1

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Chalmers Johnson, “MITI. MPT, and the Telecom Wars: How Japan Makes Policy for High Technology.” in Chalmers Johnson, Laura D’andrea Tyson, and John Zysman, eds., Politics and Productivity: How Japan’s Development Strategy Works (New 0, accessed via Nexis-Lexis.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Japan Electronics Almanac 95/96Ibid. Ibid. wide web at http:/

    Google Scholar 

  53. “Murdoch’s Japanese TV Venture Unveils New Partners,” The Reuter European Business Report/www.ft.com.mber 20, 1996, via

    Google Scholar 

  54. “JSkyB to Lauch 150 Digital TV Channels in Japan,” Financial Times, December 18, 1996, p. 30; “JSkyB to Employ NTV’s Digital High-Quality System,” Japan Economic Newswire (Kyodo), December 14, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis; and “Sony Awarded Multi-Million-Dollar Contract to Build Direct Broadcast Satellite Facility for DIRECTV JAPAN.” Business Wire, Nexis-Lexis.s/230_081897_l 1000

    Google Scholar 

  55. “JSkyB. PerfecTV Agree to Offer Each Other’s Channels,” Japan Consumer Electronics Scan (Kyodo), November 11, 1996, via Nexis-Lexis; “JSkyB to Share Operations with PerfecTV.” Japan Economic Newswire (Kyodo), Oct_25750.html.July 29, 1996, via

    Google Scholar 

  56. “Ministry Announces Plan to Go Digital in Land TV Broadcasting,” The Daily Yomiuri Nexis-Lexis. New York: Har

    Google Scholar 

  57. See “Comments from the Top” at the NHK world wide web site at http://www.nhk.or.jp/pr/keiei/toptalk/kaichoue/kaichoue.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hart, J.A. (1999). Digital Television in Europe and Japan. In: Gerbarg, D. (eds) The Economics, Technology and Content of Digital TV. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4971-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4971-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7256-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4971-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics