Advertisement

Global Sourcing Strategies Under Exchange Rate Uncertainty

  • Panos Kouvelis
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 17)

Abstract

Firms competing in the “global” marketplace have to take into account the comparative advantages of various countries in forming their manufacturing and sourcing strategies. Developing countries, for instance, have advantages over the developed nations in terms of low labor and raw material costs. Such cost advantages provide strong motivation for multinational firms to seek offshore sourcing arrangements in developing countries. In other cases, critical technological components and/or process equipment are available only from few foreign sources, which are in many cases located in technologically advanced countries other than the firm’s home country. In such cases the firm has no choice but to look at these foreign suppliers for its sourcing needs. Because of these reasons, global sourcing is increasingly emerging as a key strategy for companies seeking competitive advantages, and it represents a sizable amount of the economic activities cf multinational firms. Nearly 10 percent of Chrysler’s $8.6 billion outsourcing budget is spent on global purchases. Westinghouse spent more than 7 percent of its total purchasing dollars on international procurement.

Keywords

Exchange Rate Unit Price Volatile Exchange Rate Supply Selection Hedging Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, R. and P. Krugman (1989), “Persistent Trade Effects of Large Exchange Rate Shocks,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 635–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle, P.P., J. Ervine and S. Gibbs (1989), “Numerical Evaluation of Multivariate Contingent Claims,” The Review of Financial Studies, 2, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, M.J. and E.S. Schwartz (1985), “Evaluating Natural Resource Investments,” Journal of Business 58, 135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, J.R. and S.K. Vickery (1988), “Managing Volatile Exchange Rates in International Purchasing,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Winter, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, J.R. and S.K. Vickery (1989), “Currency Exchange Rates: Their Impact on Global Sourcing,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Fall, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, J.C., S.A. Ross and M. Rubinstein (1979), “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasu, S. and L. Li (1997), “Optimal Operating Policies in the Presence of Exchange Rate Variability,” Management Science, 43, 5, 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixit, A.K. (1989a), “Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty,” Journal of Political Economy, 97, 3, 620–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixit, A.K. (1989b), “Hysteresis, Import Penetration and Exchange Rate Pass Through,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, May, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixit, A.K. and R. S. Pindyck (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Gutierrez, G.J. and P. Kouvelis (1995), “A Robustness Approach to International Sourcing,” Annals of Operations Research, 59, 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huchzermeier, A. and M.A. Cohen (1993), “Valuing Operational Flexibility Under Exchange Rate Risk,” Operations Research, 44, 1, 100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hull, J.C. (1993), Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities, Prentice Hall, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Kogut, B. and N. Kulatilaka (1994), “Operating Flexibility, Global Manufacturing, and the Option Value of a Multinational Network,” Management Science, 40, 1, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kouvelis, P., K. Axarloglou, and V. Sinha (1997), “Exchange Rates and the Choice of Production Strategies in Supplying Foreign Markets,” Working Paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar
  16. Li, C-L and P. Kouvelis (1997), “Flexible and Risk-Sharing Supply Contracts Under Price Uncertainty,” Working Paper, Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar
  17. Lu, L. (1995), “A One-Vendor Multi-Buyer Integrated Inventory Model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 81, 312–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McDonald, R. and D. Siegel (1986), “The Value of Waiting to Invest,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 707–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonald, R. and D. Siegel (1985), “Investment and the Valuation of Firms when There is an Option to Shutdown,” International Economic Review, 26, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenthal, E.C., J.L. Zydiak and S.S. Chaudhry (1995), “Vendor Selection with Bundling,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 1, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheller-Wolf, A. and S. Tayur (1997), “Reducing International Risk Through Quantity Contracts,” Working Paper, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  22. Shimko, D.C. (1992) Finance in Continuous Time: A Primer, Kolb Publishing Co,, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  23. Trigeorgis, L. (1993), “Real Options and Interactions with Financial Flexibility,” Financial Management Autumn, 202–224.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panos Kouvelis
    • 1
  1. 1.Olin School of BusinessWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations