Advertisement

The Benefits of Design for Postponement

  • Yossi Aviv
  • Awi Federgruen
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 17)

Abstract

Delayed product differentiation and Quick Response rank among the most beneficial strategic mechanisms to manage the risks associated with product variety and uncertain sales.

Keywords

Lead Time Inventory System Aggregate Demand Inventory Position Demand Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, W., “Marketing Efficiency and the Principle of Postponement,” Cost and Profit Outlook, September (1950) 3.Google Scholar
  2. Aviv, Y. & A. Federgruen, “Stochastic Inventory Models With Limited Production Capacity and Periodically Varying Parameters,” Probability in the Engineering and Informational Science 11 (1997a) 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aviv, Y. & A. Federgruen, “Capacitated Multi-Item Inventory Systems with Random and Seasonally Fluctuating Demands,” Working Paper (1997b), Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, NY Google Scholar
  4. Aviv, Y. & A. Federgruen, “Design for Postponement: A Comprehensive Characterization of its Benefits Under Unknown Demand Distributions,” Working Paper (1997c), Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, NY Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, L., “The Bright New Worlds of Benetton,” International Management, November (1987) 24–35.Google Scholar
  6. Bucklin, L.P., “Postponement, Speculation and the Structure of Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, Volume 2, February (1965) 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, F. & Y.S. Zheng, “Waiting Time Distribution in (T, S) Inventory Systems,” Operations Research Letters 12 (1992) 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, F. & Y.S. Zheng, “Lower Bounds for Multi-Echelon Stochastic Inventory systems,” Management Science 40 (1994) 1426–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A.J. & H. Scarf, “Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem,” Management Science 6 (1960) 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox, R. & C.S. Goodman, “Marketing of Housebuilding Materials,” The Journal of Marketing 21 (1956) 55–56.Google Scholar
  11. Dapiran, P., “Benetton — Global Logistics in Action,” Asian Pacific International J. Business Logistics, (1992) 7–11.Google Scholar
  12. Ealey, L. & G. Mercer, “The Showroom as Assembly Line,” The McKinsey Quarterly 3 (1992) 103–120.Google Scholar
  13. Eppen, G. & L. Schrage, “Centralized Ordering Policies in a Multiwarehouse System with Leadtimes and Random Demands,” in Multi-Level Production/Inventory Control Systems: Theory and Practice, (L. Schwarz, Ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, (1981) 51–69.Google Scholar
  14. Erhardt, R., “The Power Approximation for Computing (s,S) Inventory Policies,” Management Science 25 (1979) 777–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erkip, N., W.H. Hausman & S. Nahmias, “Optimal Centralized Ordering Policies in Multi-Echelon Inventory Systems with Correlated Demands,” Management Science 36 (1990) 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Federgruen, A., “Recent Advances in Production and Distribution Management,” in Perspectives in Operations Management, (R. Sarin, Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass. (1993)Google Scholar
  17. Federgruen, A., “Comments on: Variability Reduction through Operations Reversal in Supply Chain Re-Engineering,” Columbia University (1998).Google Scholar
  18. Federgruen, A. & P. Zipkin, “Approximations of Dynamic, Multilocation Production and Inventory Problems,” Management Science 30 (1984a) 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Federgruen, A. & P. Zipkin, “Allocation Policies and Cost Approximations for Multilocation Inventory Systems,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 31 (1984b) 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federgruen, A. & P. Zipkin, “Computational Issues in an Infinite Horizon Multi-Echelon Inventory Model,” Operations Research 32 (1984c) 818–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, M.L. & A. Raman, “Reducing The Cost of Demand Uncertainty Through Accurate Response to Early Sales,” Operations Research 44 (1996) 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flaherty, M.T., Global Operations Management, McGraw-Hill (1996).Google Scholar
  23. Flaherty, M.T., M. Cohen, L. Kopczak, H. Lee & D. Pyke, “Teaching Note for Hewlett Packard: DeskJet Printer Supply Chain (A),” Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (1996).Google Scholar
  24. Gallego, G. & I. Moon, “The Distribution Free Newsboy Problem: Review and Extensions,” Journal of Operational Research Society 44 (1993) 825–834.Google Scholar
  25. Garg A. & CS. Tang, “On Postponement Strategies for Product Families with Multiple Points of Differentiation,” IIE Transaction 29 (1997) 641–650.Google Scholar
  26. Gavirneni S. & S. Tayur, “Delayed Product Differentiation and Information sharing,” Working Paper, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University (1997).Google Scholar
  27. Gingrich J. & H. Metz, “Conquering the Cost of Complexity,” Business Horizons (1990) 64–71.Google Scholar
  28. Gonsalvez, D., “Integrating Sales and Manufacturing Order Management Processes, Applied Scheduling: Integration of Disciplines,” Columbia University, October 24–25 (1991), New-York, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Hammond J. & M. Kelly, “Quick Response in the Apparel Industry,” Harvard Teaching Note N9–690–038 (1990).Google Scholar
  30. Harvard Business School, “Benetton (A) and (B),” Harvard Teaching Case 9–685–014 (1986).Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, G. & H. Thompson, “Optimality of Myopic Inventory Policies for Certain Dependent Demand Processes,” Management Science 21 (1975) 1303–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kapuscinski, R. & S. Tayur, “A Capacitated Production-Inventory Model with Periodic Demand,” Working Paper, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1995).Google Scholar
  33. Kapuscinski, R. & S. Tayur, “Variance vs. Standard Deviation — Note on: Variability Reduction Through Operations Reversal in Supply Chain Re-Engineering,” Working Paper, University of Michigan and Carnegie Mellon University (1998).Google Scholar
  34. Kopczak, L. & H. Lee, Hewlett Packard: DeskJet Printer Supply Chain (A), Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1993).Google Scholar
  35. Kurt Salomon Associates Inc., “Efficient Consumer Response: Enhancing Consumer Value in The Grocery Industry,” Food Marketing Institute, Washington, D.C. (1993).Google Scholar
  36. Lee, H., “Design for Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Examples,” in Perspectives in Operations Management, (R. Sarin Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass. (1993).Google Scholar
  37. Lee, H., “Effective Management of Inventory and Service Through Product and Process Redesign,” Operations Research 44 (1996) 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, H., & C. Billington, “Designing Products and Processes for Postponement,” in Management of Design: Engineering and Management Perspectives, (S. Dasu and C. Eastman Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Mass. (1994), 105–122.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, H., C. Billington & B. Carter, “Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service through Design for Localization,” Interfaces, August (1993) 1–11.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, H., & CS. Tang, “Modeling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation,” Management Science 43 (1997).Google Scholar
  41. Lee, H., & CS. Tang, “Variability Reduction Through Operations Reversal,” Management Science 44 (1998) 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lovejoy, W.S., “Myopic Policies for Some Inventory Models with Uncertain Demand,” Management Science 36 (1990).Google Scholar
  43. Miller, B., “Scarf’s State Reduction Method, Flexibility, and a Dependent Demand Inventory Model,” Operations Research 34 (1986) 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mrena, C, “Supply Chain Strategies at Sun Microsystems,” Presentation at the Supply Chain Management Conference, Santa Clara University, California, May 15 (1997).Google Scholar
  45. “Compaq Plans A Big Change in its PC Sales,” New York Times, May 5 (1996).Google Scholar
  46. Scarf, H., “A min-max solution of an inventory problem,” Chapter 12 in Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production, Stanford University Press, (1958).Google Scholar
  47. Schwarz, L.B., “Model for Assessing the Value of Warehouse Risk-Pooling: Risk Pooling over Outside-Supplier Leadtimes,” Management Science 35 (1989) 828–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Signorelli, S. & J.L. Heskett, “Benetton (A),” Harvard Business School, (1989).Google Scholar
  49. Sobel, M., Dynamic Affine Logistics Models. Report. SUNY at Stony Brook (1988).Google Scholar
  50. Swaminathan, J. & S. Tayur, “Managing Broader Product Lines Through Delayed Differentiation Using Vanilla Boxes,” Working Paper, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University (1996).Google Scholar
  51. Vaile R.S., E.T. Grether & R. Cox, Marketing in the American Economy, New York, Ronald Press (1952) 149–150.Google Scholar
  52. Van Doremalen, J. & H. Fleurn, “A Quantitative Model for the Analysis of Distribution Network Scenarios,” in Modern Production Concepts: Theory and Applications, Fandel and Zapfel, Springer Verlag, Berlin, (1991) 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Veinott, A. Jr., “Optimal Policy for a Multi-Product, Dynamic Non-Stationary Inventory Problem,” Management Science 12 (1965) 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. “GM Expands Plan to Speed Cars to Buyers,” Wall Street Journal, October 21 (1996).Google Scholar
  55. Zinn W. & Bowersox, D.J., “Planning Physical Distribution with the Principle of Postponement,” J. Business Logistics, 9 (1988) 117–136.Google Scholar
  56. Zipkin, P., “Critical Number Policies for Inventory Model with Periodic Data,” Management Science 35 (1989) 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yossi Aviv
    • 1
  • Awi Federgruen
    • 2
  1. 1.Olin School of BusinessWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations