Advertisement

Value of Information Sharing and Comparison with Delayed Differentiation

  • Srinagesh Gavirneni
  • Sridhar Tayur
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 17)

Abstract

The industrial supplier-customer relations have undergone radical changes in recent years as the philosophy behind managing manufacturing systems continues to be influenced by several Japanese manufacturing practices. As more organizations realize that successful in-house implementation of Just-In-Time alone will have limited effect, they are seeking other members of their supply chain to change their operations. This has resulted in a certain level of co-operation, mainly in the areas of supply contracts and information sharing, that was lacking before. This is especially true when dealing with customized products, and is most commonly seen between suppliers and their larger customers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Armistead, CG. and Mapes, J., “The impact of supply chain integration on operating performance,” Logistics Information Management, 6 (1993), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Aviv, Y. and Federgruen, A., “Stochastic Inventory Models with Limited Production Capacity and Periodically Varying Parameters,” Probability in The Engineering and Informational Science, 11 (1997), 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Cachon, G., “Value of Information in a One Warehouse Multi Retailer System,” Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chen, F., “Echelon Reorder Points, Installation Reorder Points, and the Value of Centralized Demand Information,” Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Federgruen, A. and P. Zipkin, “An inventory model with limited production capacity and uncertain demands I: The average-cost criterion,” Mathematics of Operations Research, 11 (1986), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Federgruen, A. and P. Zipkin, “An inventory model with limited production capacity and uncertain demands II: The discounted-cost criterion,” Mathematics of Operations Research, 11 (1986), 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gavirneni, S. “Inventories in Supply Chains under Co-operation,” GSIA Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, August 1997.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Glasserman, P. and S. Tayur, “The stability of a capacitated, multi-echelon production-inventory system under a base-stock policy,” Operations Research, 42 (1994), 913–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Glasserman, P. and S. Tayur, “Sensitivity analysis for base-stock levels in multi-echelon production-inventory systems,” Management Science, 42 (1995), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hariharan, R. and P. Zipkin, “Customer-order Information, Lead times, and Inventories,” Management Science, 41 (1995), 1599–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kapuscinski, R. and S. Tayur, “A Capacitated Production-Inventory Model with Periodic Demand,” GSIA working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, November 1995; revised January 1996, to appear in Operations Research.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lee, H. and C. S. Tang, “Modeling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation,” Management Science,43 (1997), 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lee, H. et al., “Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service through Design for Localization,” Interfaces,23 (1993), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Scarf, H.E., “The Optimality of (s, S) policies in the dynamic inventory problem,” in K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes (editors), Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Scheller-Wolf, A. and S. Tayur, “Reducing International Risk through Quantity Contracts,” GSIA working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, April 1997.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Takac, P.F., “Electronic data interchange (EDI): an avenue to better performance and the improvement of trading relationships?,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 5 (1992), 22–36.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Zheng, Y. and P. Zipkin, “A Queuing Model to Analyze the Value of Centralized Inventory Information,” Operations Research, 38 (1990), 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinagesh Gavirneni
    • 1
  • Sridhar Tayur
    • 2
  1. 1.SchlumbergerAustinUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Industrial AdministrationCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations