Advertisement

Modeling Impacts of Electronic Data Interchange Technology

  • Sunder Kekre
  • Tridas Mukhopadhyay
  • Kannan Srinivasan
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 17)

Abstract

Supply chains today are increasingly depending on effective and efficient information exchanges between the value chain partners. Over the last decade, practices such as just in time management, quick response manufacturing and lean production systems have required coordinated and reliable information exchanges between trading partners (HBS 1991). Massive investments in information technology (IT) have been made by manufacturers, suppliers and logistics providers with the hope of achieving successful JIT implementation in their supply chains (Kekre et al., 1992; Schonberger 1986). From a managerial standpoint, these companies face the following questions:
  • What are the operational gains accrued by the manufacturer and their suppliers?

  • Does the technology payoff?

Keywords

Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Cost Category Electronic Data Interchange Assembly Center 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amemiya, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barua, A., C. H. Kriebel and T. Mukhopadhyay (March 1995). “Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation.” Information Systems Research 6(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh and R. E. Welsch (1980). Regression Diagnostics, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (September 1979). “A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation.” Econometrica 47(9), 1287–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson, E. (December 1993). “The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology.” Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, G. (1980). “Analysis of Co-variance with Qualitative Data.” Review of Economic Studies 47, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldfeld, S. M. and R. E. Quandt (1972). Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Gonul, F. and K. Srinivasan (Summer 1993). “Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues.” Market Sci. 12, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene, W. H. (1990). Econometric Analysis, New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  10. Hauser, J. R. (May 1978). “Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information Theoretic Approach.” Oper. Res. 26, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hausman, J. and D. Wise (1981). “Stratification on Endogenous Variables and Estimation: The Gary Income Maintenance Experiment.” Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. HBS (1991). “Chrysler Corporation: JIT and EDI (A).” Harvard Business School Case Study, 9-191-146, MA: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Heckman, J. J. and B. Singer (1984). “A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Data for Duration Data.” Econometrica 52, 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Judge, George G., W. E. Griffiths, R. Carter Hill, N. Lütkepohl and T. C. Lee (1985). Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Kekre, S. and T. Mukhopadhyay (December 1992). “Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on Quality Improvement and Inventory Reduction Programs: A Field Study.” Internationaljournal of Production Economics 28(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kmenta, Jan (1986). Elements of Econometrics, New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Mukhopadhyay, T, S. Kekre and S. Kalathur (June 1995). “Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of EDI.” MIS Quarterly, 137–156.Google Scholar
  18. Mukhopadhyay, T., S. Kekre and T. Pokorney (1998). “Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Data Interchange.” GSIA Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  19. Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfeld (1981). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Schonberger, R. J. (1986). World Class Manufacturing: The Lessons of Simplicity Applied, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Spencer, D. E. and K. N. Berk (July 1981). “A Limited Information Specification Test.”Econometrica 49(7), 1079–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Srinivasan, K., Sunder Kekre and Tridas Mukhopadhyay (1994). “Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology Support on JIT Shipments.” Management Science 40(10), 1291–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. White, H. (April 1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test For Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48(4), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sunder Kekre
    • 1
  • Tridas Mukhopadhyay
    • 1
  • Kannan Srinivasan
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Industrial AdministrationCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations