Skip to main content

From Monocentricity to Polycentricity

  • Chapter
An Essay on Urban Economic Theory

Part of the book series: Advances in Urban and Regional Economics ((UREC,volume 1))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a bridge between the first and the second parts of our book. It defends the utility of the monocentric paradigm which has been the subject of growing criticism in recent years, and it provides background to support the need for a robust polycentric city model. We explore the relationship between the exponential density function [EDF] and the monocentric city model, and we examine to what extent a failure of the EDF invalidates the monocentric paradigm itself. We explain why a negative correlation between the density gradient and city size does not imply a failure of the monocentric paradigm—not even a failure of the EDF. We also discuss the declining rôle of the CBD, reasons why such decline does not invalidate the monocentric city model and specific ways in which this paradigm helps, and will continue to help, understanding important urban phenomena. We conclude that the monocentric paradigm is far from obsolete, and we expect that it will provide the stepping stone for the construction of a robust polycentric city model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • W. Alonso, 1960, A Theory of the Urban Land Market. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 6, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Alonso, 1964, Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Anas, R.J. Arnott and K.A. Small, forthcoming, Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Arnott, 1979, Unpriced Transportation Congestion. Journal of Economic Theory 21, 294–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Arnott, R. Davidson and D. Pines, 1986, Spatial Aspects of Housing Quality, Density and Maintenance. Journal of Urban Economics 19, 190–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Arnott, D. Pines and E. Sadka, 1986, The Effects of Equiproportional Transport Improvement in a Closed Monocentric City. Regional Science and Urban Economics 16, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Arnott and J.E. Stiglitz, 1979, Aggregate Land Rents, Expenditure on Public Goods, and Optimal City Size. Quarterly Journal of Economics 93, 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Brueckner, 1982, A Note on Sufficient Conditions for Negative Exponential Population Density. Journal of Regional Science 22, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Clark, 1951, Urban Population Densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 114(Series A), 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Dixit, 1973, The Optimum Factory Town. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Edmonston, 1975, Population Distribution in American Cities. Heath and Company, Lexington Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fujita and H. Ogawa, 1982, Multiple Equilibria and Structural Transition of Non-Monocentric Urban Configurations. Regional Science and Urban Economics 12, 161-7-651.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Giuliano and K.A. Small, 1991, Subcenters in the Los Angeles Region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Glickman, 1979, The Growth and Management of the Japanese Urban System. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Goldberg and J. Mercer, 1986, The Myth of the North American City. The University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Harrison and J. Kain, 1974, Cumulative Urban Growth and Urban Density Functions. Journal of Urban Economics 1, 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Hartwick and J. Hartwick, 1974, Efficient Resource Allocation in a Multinucleated City with Intermediate Goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 340–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Henderson, 1986, Efficiency of Resources Usage and City Size. Journal of Urban Economics 19, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Herbert and B.H. Stevens, 1960, A Model for the Distribution of Residential Activity in Urban Areas. Journal of Regional Science 2, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Imai, 1982, CBD Hypothesis and the Economics of Agglomeration. Journal of Economic Theory 28, 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Kanemoto, 1977, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Second-Best Land Use in Transportation. Journal of Urban Economics 4, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Krugman, 1995, Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Landsberger and S. Lidgi, 1978, Equilibrium Rent Differentials in a Multicenter City. Regional Science and Urban Economics 8, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Mieszkowski and E.S. Mills, 1993, The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Mieszkowski and B. Smith, 1991, Analyzing Urban Decentralization: The Case of Houston. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills, 1967, An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area. American Economic Review 57, 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills and K. Ohta, 1976, Urbanization and Urban Problem. In H. Patrick and H. Rosovsky (eds.), Asia&$#x2019;s New Giant: How the Japanese Economy Works. The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C., 673–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills and R. Price, 1984, Metropolitan Suburbanization and Central City Problems. Journal of Urban Economics 15, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Mills and J.P. Tan, 1980, A Comparison of Urban Population Density Functions in Developed and Developing Countries. Urban Studies 17, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Mohring, 1961, Land Values and the Measurement of Highway Benefits. Journal of Political Economy 69, 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. F. Muth, 1961, The Spatial Structure of the Housing Market, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 7, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Muth, 1969, Cities and Housing. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Odland, 1978, The Conditions for Multi-Center Cities. Economic Geography 54, 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Ogawa and M. Fujita, 1980, Equilibrium Land Use Pattern in a Non-Monocentric City. Journal of Regional Science 20, 455–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Papageorgiou, 1970, A Generalization of the Population Density Gradient Concept. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Papageorgiou, 1971, The Population Density and Rent Distribution Models Within a Multicentre Framework. Environment and Planning 3, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.Y. Papageorgiou and D. Pines, 1989, The Exponential Density Function: First Principles, Comparative Statics and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Urban Economics 26, 264–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Romanos, 1977, Household Location in a Linear Multi-Center Metropolitan Area. Regional Science and Urban Economics 7, 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sivitanidou, 1996, Do Office-Commercial Firms Value Access to Service Employment Centers? A Hedonic Value Analysis Within Polycentric Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Economics 40, 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Solow, 1973, Congestion Cost and the Use of Land for Streets. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 602–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Tabuchi, forthcoming, Urban Agglomeration and Dispersion: A Synthesis of Alonso and Krugman. Journal of Urban Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. von Boventer, 1976, Transportation Costs, Accessibility, and Agglomeration Economies: Centers, Subcenters, and Metropolitan Structures. Papers of the Regional Science Association 37, 167–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.C. Wheaton, 1974, A Comparative Statics Analysis of Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Theory 9, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.J. White, 1977, Firm Suburbanization and Urban Subcenters. Journal of Urban Economics 3, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papageorgiou, Y.Y., Pines, D. (1999). From Monocentricity to Polycentricity. In: An Essay on Urban Economic Theory. Advances in Urban and Regional Economics, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4947-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4947-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7245-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4947-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics