Skip to main content

Abstract

A feature provides a shorthand by which information can be communicated quickly and efficiently. At their essence, features are an efficient and powerful means of information transfer. To engineers, “features,” and the information they represent, are of interest in many types of analysis. The particular type of analysis defines what specific “features” are germane. In an engineering environment, features are often associated with both manufacturing and design information. Because of this application-dependent aspect, attempts to precisely define what a feature is have come up short. It is more or less agreed upon amongst researchers that a feature is a “physical part of an object being mappable to a generic shape and having functional significance” (van Holland and Bronsvoort, 1995). Beyond this, attempts at defining “generic shape” and “functional significance” often involve generating large taxonomies of feature shapes and functions (Shah, 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bezdek, Edward J. (1997) “An enhanced volumetric feature recognition method for direct engineering.” Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek, J. C. (1981) Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Plenum, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, David A. and Wang, Cheng-Hua (1995) “Design and manufacturing of sheet metal parts: Using features to resolve manufacturability problems.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 745–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Steven L. and Greenway, R. Bryan Jr. (1995) “Using STEP to integrate design features with manufacturing features.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 579–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. N., McMahon, C. A., and Sims Williams, J. H. (1995) “Features, a. k. a. the semantics of a formal language of manufacturing.” Research in Engineering Design, 7 (3), 151–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, William C. and Yang, Yuhwei (1995) “The STEP integration information architecture.” Engineering with Computers, (11), 136–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Chi-Cheng Peter and Gadh, Rajit (1996) “Feature-based approach for set-up minimization of process design from product design.” Computer-Aided Design, 28 (5), 321–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, S.-H. F. and Henderson, M. R. (1994) “Using subgraph isomorphisms to recognize and decompose boundary representation features.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 116 (3), 793–800, September.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, Sheng H. and Huang, S. F. (1996) “Feature decomposition from solid models for automatic flattening.” Computer-Aided Design, 28 (6/7), 473–481, June/July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. E. R. and Corney, J. (1994) “Identification of general protrusion and depression features.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, James K. (1993) “Automated recognition of volumetric form features from solid models using surface extension.” Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, James K., Crawford, Richard H., and Wood, Kristin L. (1994) “Form feature recognition using base volume decomposition.” ASME Advances in Design Automation, 1, 281–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition Corporation (1995) Cost Advantage User’s Guide, Cognition Corporation, 755 Middlesex Turnpike, Billerica, Massachusetts, 01821, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, Rowan E. (1991) “Geometric reasoning for mechanical engineering design.” Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Diganta, Gupta, Satyandra K., and Nau, Dana S. (1994) “Reducing setup cost by automated generation of redesign suggestions.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dave, Parag and Sakurai, Hiroshi (1995) “Maximal volume decomposition and its application to feature recognition.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 553–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Z. and de Pennington, A. (1994) “Geometric reasoning based on graph grammar parsing.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 116 (3), 763–69, September.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Z. and Nee, A. Y. C. (1994) “Interpreting feature viewpoints for concurrent engineering.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 405–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadh, R. and Prinz, F. B. (1995) “Automatic determination of feature interactions in design-for-manufacturing analysis.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 117 (1), 2–9, March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadh, R. and Prinz, F. B. (1995) “Computationally efficient approach to feature abstraction in design-manufacturing integration.” Journal of Engineering for Industry, 117 (1), 16–27, February.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadh, Rajit (1993) “A hybrid approach to intelligent geometric design using features-based design and feature recognition.” Proceedings of the 19th Advances in Design Automation Conference, 2, 273–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelink, Reinholt, et al. (1995) “Unified feature definition for feature based design and feature based manufacturing.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 517–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Theodore S. and Dilts, David M. (1996) “Automated design-to-cost: integrating costing into the design decision.” Computer-Aided Design, 28 (6/7), 423–38, June/July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyandra K. Gupta, et al. (1994) “Building MRSEV models for CAM applications.” Advances in Engineering Software, 20 (2–3), 121–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, JungHyun and Requicha, Aristides A. G. (1994) “Incremental recognition of machining features.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 143–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, JungHyun and Requicha, Aristides A. G. (1995) “Integration of feature based design and feature recognition.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 569–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horaud, Radu and Sossa, Humberto (1995) “Polyhedral object recognition by indexing.” Pattern Recognition, 28 (12), 1855–70, December.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Qiang, Marefat, Michael M., and Lever, Paul J. (1995) “Evidential reasoning approach for recognizing shape features.” Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, IEEE, 162–68, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S. and Chang, T. C. (1988) “Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3-D solid model.” Computer Aided Design, 20 (1), 58–66.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, T. R. (1992) “A library of material removal shape element volumes (MRSEVs), Technical Report NISTIR 4809.” Technical Report, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, F.-L., et al. (1995) “Features—semantic objects for the integration of tasks in the product development process.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 667–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Nein-Lung and Menq, Chia-Hsiang. (1995) “Automatic recognition of geometric forms from b-rep models.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 805–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Sreekumar and Kim, Yong Se (1994) “Handling blending features in form feature recognition using convex decomposition.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, Shyam V. and Ling, Zhi-Kui (1994) “Heuristics based feature recognition: A graph approach.” Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference, ASME, 1, 299–306, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaneethakrishnan, Ravisrinivas (1993) “An object-oriented formalism for geometric reasoning in engineering design and manufacture.” Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaneethakrishnan, Ravisrinivas, Wood, Kristin L., and Crawford, Richard H. (1995) “An object-oriented formalism for geometric reasoning in engineering design and manufacture.” ASME Advances in Design Automation, 2, 301–13, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parienté, Frédéric and Kim, Yong Se (1995) “Incremental and localized update of convex decomposition for form feature decomposition.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 587–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qamhiyah, A. Z., Venter, R. D., and Benhabib, B. (1996) “A generalized method for the classification and extraction of form features.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regli, William C., Gupta, Satyandra K., and Nau, Dana S. (1994) “Feature recognition for manufacturability analysis.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1,93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regli, William C., Gupta, Satyandra K., and Nau, Dana S. (1995) “Extracting alternative machining features: An algorithmic approach.” Research in Engineering Design, 7 (3), 173–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. W., Dixon, J. R., and Finger, S. (1994) “Conversions of feature-based design representations using graph grammar parsing.” Journal of Mechanical Design, 116 (3), 785–92, September.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Hiroshi. (1994) “Decomposing a delta volume into maximal convex volumes and sequencing them for machining.” ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, 1, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Hiroshi and Dave, Parag. (1996) “Volume decomposition and feature recognition, Part II: curved objects.” Computer-Aided Design, 28 (6/7), 519–37, June/July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J. J. (1988) “Feature transformations between application specific feature spaces.” Computer Aided Engineering, 247–55, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J. J. (1991) “Assessment of features technology.” Computer Aided Design, 23 (5), 331–43, June.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Yan and Shah, Jami J. (1994) “Feature recognition by volume decomposition using half-space partitioning.” Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference, ASME, 1, 575–83, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, Somashekar and Wozny, Michael. (1995) “Overview of automatic feature recognition techniques for computer-aided process planning.” Computers in Industry, 26 (1), 1–21, April.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Yuan-Jye and Joshi, Sanjay B. (1994) “Recognizing multiple interpretations of interacting machining features.” Computer Aided Design, 26 (9), 667–688, September.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Winfried van and Bronsvoort, Willem F. (1995) “Assembly features and visibility maps.” ASME Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium, 691–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbrande, Jan H. and Requicha, Aristides A. G. (1993) “Spatial reasoning for the automatic recognition of machinable features in solid models.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15 (12), 1269–85, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Eric and Kim, Yong Se. (1994) “Inductive generation of combination operations for form feature recognition using convex decomposition.” Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 27, 123–26, Ashikaga, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, T. C. (1982) “Feature extraction by volume decomposition.” Proceedings of the Conference on CAD/CAM Technology in Mechanical Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, D. and Dong, Z. (1994) “Coding and clustering of design and manufacturing features for concurrent design.” Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference, ASME, 1, 533–45, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Ali K. Kamrani Ph.D. Peter R. Sferro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bezdek, E.J., Thompson, D.C., Wood, K.L., Crawford, R.H. (1999). Volumetric Feature Recognition for Direct Engineering. In: Kamrani, A.K., Sferro, P.R. (eds) Direct Engineering: Toward Intelligent Manufacturing . Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4941-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4941-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7242-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4941-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics