Abstract
Generally, NDI methods for determining case depth are based on inferring case depth indirectly through measuring electromagnetic or elastic properties of the part using eddy current or ultrasonic probes.1–4 Eddy current systems are commonly used for case depth measurements and are known to be reliable for many applications4. However, they lack sensitivity if the case depth is deep (e.g. greater than 5 mm in steel parts) because of the compromise required between a sufficiently high frequency to obtain adequate coupling and a sufficiently low frequency to obtain adequate penetration of the part. Further, custom probes are required for inspection of components with different geometries. When the steel is hardened, the eddy current techniques are dependent on changes in the magnetic permeability and the electrical conductivity of the steel, whereas the ultrasonic techniques are dependent on changes in the elastic modulus of the steel. It is not generally known whether the changes in the electromagnetic properties or the elastic properties correlate better with the hardness. Further, since the same hardness can be achieved through different processing paths, it is not clear if the correlation for either set of properties is unique or is dependent on the specific processing path.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
A. Abbate, S.C. Schroeder, B.E. Knight, F. Yee and J. Frankel, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 15, Eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York, 1996, p.585.
G. Gordon and B.R. Tittmann, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 15, Eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York, (1996) p. 1597.
M. Rosen Materials Analysis by Ultrasonics, Ed. A. Vary, Noyes Data Corp., 79, (1987).
C.H. Stephen and H.L. Chesney, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 42, (1984) p. 1612.
B.R. Tittmann and R.B. Thompson, in Proc. of the 9th Symp. on NDT Tech, SWRI, San Antonio, TX, p. 20, (1973).
A. Safaeinili, A.D.W. McKie, and R. C. Addison, Jr., Material Research Bulletin, Vol. 21, p. 53, (1996).
J.M. Richardson, Journal of Appl. Physics, Vol. 48(2), pp. 498–512, (1977).
C.B. Scruby and L.E. Drain, Laser Ultrasonics — Techniques and Applications, Adam Hilger, New York (1990).
J.M. Vaughan, The Fabry-Pérot Interferometer: History, Theory, Practice and Applications, Adam Hilger, New York (1989).
J.-P. Monchalin and R. Heon, Materials Evaluation Vol. 44, 1231 (1986).
T. Lyman ed., ASM Metals Handbook Vol. 2, 8th Edition, (1964) p. 93.
A. Safaeinili, A.D.W. McKie, and R. C. Addison, Jr., Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 16, Eds. D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Press, New York, (1997) p. 1625.
B. A. Auld, Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, II, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida 1990, Ch. 12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Addison, R.C., Safaeinili, A., McKie, A.D.W. (1998). Ultrasonic Determination of Case Depth and Surface Hardness in Axles. In: Green, R.E. (eds) Nondestructive Characterization of Materials VIII. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4847-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4847-8_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7198-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4847-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive